A note of further amplification.
S-band, 10cm,
radars are not good at picking up small craft and small objects regardless of constuction. Buoys, periscopes, sailboats, and even steel hulled fishing boats fit in this category as well. The same properties that allow it to "punch" through rain squalls allow it to miss these targets. The USCG has done quite a bit of study on
radar reflectors and their buoys are so equipped. To date, they have been unsuccessful at producing a passive reflector that
paints well on the 10cm
radar. Hence the use of racons and ramarks, which are designed to
paint the 10cm
radar with a distinguishing mark.
X-band, or 3cm, is the
radar that your
radar reflector will usually
paint the best. On a sailboat, or small buoy, we are talking about an increase in detection from approximately 2 miles to 5 miles with anything further being gravy, practically speaking. Given that the sea clutter on a 3cm set may easily extend outwards to 2 miles, the increase in detected distance ain't chopped liver.
None of the devices test out accurately in lab conditions although pentahedral and octahedral shapes seem to work the best. The best of designs all fall short of reliability in an actual seaway, but all beat having nothing at all. The motion of your boat makes a consistent return, even on a 3cm
radar, virtually impossible.
I wouldn't discourage anyone from the purchase of a tri-lens but would not consider anything but a mast mount, as high as practicable. The Davis has as good a record as any, which isn't saying much, and I'd endorse it's use. With all such devices, there is no substitute for size-which is exactly where we started in discussing the problem in the first place isn't it?
The advent of active
radar reflectors, or transponders, at reasonable prices and mounting options should be an area of intense interest to us all.