Quote:
Originally Posted by amayotte
Ya I know.
I have just bought the boat and spent the weekend working on getting the mast up.
I had to do it by hand, so it wasn't easy, and once I got it up I was hurrying to hook up the forestay and forgot about the furler. I decided since it was just for the weekend I would leave it the way it is.
Any ideas on what type of mast was used by chrysler and which type of rigid spreaders would work?
The one thing that boggles me a little is that in order to counter compression people drill holes through the mast, at the half way point, and create a weak point in the mast. Doesn't make sense to me.
Oh well, I'm obviously not an engineer.
Thanks again,
Adam
|
Hi Adam, It's been raining off and on today so I had some extra time.
Looking at your pictures, some thoughts came to me. I hope you don't mind but I drew on your photos.
First, your chainplates and
turnbuckles. It appeared to me that most of the shroud
turnbuckles on the starboard side were closed almost completely. Is that because the mast was leaning to starboard, (thats what I see in the photo), or are
all the shrouds long?
And the chainplate seems light duty to me.
chainplate.jpg
You definitely have some issues with the headstay/
furling gear. But I understand that you haven't finished setting it up.
profurl.jpg
Your starboard spreader is sagging. In needs to be at the correct angle, (usually indicated by the spreader base/bracket), to do it's job effectively.
spreader sag.jpg
The bottom
line. In my opinion, your spreaders are probably sufficient the way they are designed. Of course that opinion may change when you provide a close-up of the spreaders.
You have a fairly light
rig, if you sail it like it was designed to be sailed you probably won't have a problem with your mast collapsing from spreader compression.
