what size outboard? - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  

Quick Menu
Boat Reviews  
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Marine Electronics
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here

Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 
Old 05-26-2008
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: western canada
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
feetup is on a distinguished road

Interesting, I just saw 98 lb for the 9.9, and 97 for the 8hp. Both in the high tourque "T" models, not the standard "F". I didn't check the 2 strokes.

Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Old 05-26-2008
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 14
Quickstep192 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by feetup View Post

Interesting, I just saw 98 lb for the 9.9, and 97 for the 8hp. Both in the high tourque "T" models, not the standard "F". I didn't check the 2 strokes.


I was looking at the models they called "portable". When I looked at the "T" models, I saw more similar weights, albeit 102 and 104.

2006 Yamaha High Thrust Specifications

Honda's website shows the current Honda 8 at 92lbs. No wonder it seems so heavy!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Old 05-26-2008
Plumper's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 845
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
Plumper is on a distinguished road
I think you'll find, on the Honda website, that the 8 and the 9.9 are exactly the same engine with some high performance tuning stuff on the 9.9.

Honda BF8 4-Stroke Marine Outboard Engine - 8 HP Motor Specs

Honda BF9.9 4-Stroke Marine Outboard Engine - 9.9 HP Motor Specs

I had a 9.9 and it was fantastic. It always started, ran very efficiently and was powerful and quiet. It pushed my Ranger 26 at hull speed even into nasty winds.
There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
Shakespeare, Julius Caesar IV, iii, 217
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Old 05-26-2008
KnightsDream's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Corpus Christi TX
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
KnightsDream is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Skype™ to KnightsDream
I found the article and comments very interesting and helpful. Thank you for all of the information.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Old 05-26-2008
Valiente's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Valiente has a spectacular aura about Valiente has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by knormb View Post
Thanks for the advice. I've been looking around and talking to other boat owners in the area, and have just about decided that I'll go with Yamaha. For the same reasons mentioned - a reliable product with good dealer support.

So now the decisions (besides when).

8HP vs 9.9? The 9.9 is only a few pounds heavier and $300 more expensive. So if either one would easily keep the boat at hull speed (if necessary), I'm wondering what the extra power would do for me. Less strain on the engine (longer life)? 20% more engine displacement, would that mean 20% higher fuel consumption?

20" vs. 25" shaft? I'll need to replace my motor mount either way, so which one would you choose? My logic leads me towards the 25", in that the power head and tilt handle would be more accessible. What would be the downside?

Thanks again for the great advice!

Your prop configuration is going to mean more than your HP here, in my opinion, as you can't go faster than 5 knots with a displacement hull. You should discuss power curves and prop pitches with other sailors who understand the concepts. Basically, as a sailboat auxiliary O/B, you want to move large chunks of water, which infers a lot of torque. This argues for the 9.9 HP, but they aren't all created equal. I noticed, for instance, that my 9.9 HP Honda BF100 long-shaft moved my Zodiac onto the plane more slowly than my 25 lbs. lighter Mercury 9.9 HP two-stroke short shaft, but that the top speed was better with the Honda once up on the plane (20 knots vs. 18 knots). Conversely, the Honda worked better as a "tow motor" when I needed to lash the Zodiac to the sailboat when the inboard had issues. The Honda was markedly quieter and cleaner burning than the Mercury, but this is generally the case.

You want a nice clean acceleration without cavitating the prop on a sailboat...whereas an outboard for a planing boat should provide "burst" acceleration...sort of the opposite. So discuss with other outboard users and figure out the weight penalties, etc. A lot of people use 5 HPs around here for 4,000-5,000 lb. 24- and 25-footers, like Sharks, but I notice they tend to run them at top speed to get to the start line.

A note on Hondas: "Hard to start" is relative. My 1985 BF100 and my 2008 BF2 (the air-cooled 27 pound four-stroke) have the exact same "habit". When cold, pull the choke out full and give two rapid pulls. Nothing may happen. Then, push the choke in to the half-way point...give a rapid pull and it should start. Let run for 30 seconds before easing the choke in.

The fact that a semi-antique Honda four and a brand-new model respond identically makes me think that this is a "Honda thing" and not some kind of brand-wide flaw. Nonetheless, Yamahas are also hardly ever a bad choice.

Re: shaft length. This again is a function of your tolerance for weight off the stern, your motor lift arrangements, the height of your transom and the likelihood of the prop clearing the water while in a seaway. Generally, long shaft is preferred, but again, find out what works for boats with similar set-ups. I like motor wells in smaller boats, but they aren't common these days.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Old 05-26-2008
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
knormb is on a distinguished road
I forgot to mention that I'd be buying the High Thrust model. Therefore, a few pounds heavier. So you've convinced me. It will be the 9.9, 25" shaft. I'll clean up (and tune up) the Johnson and maybe get a few hundred for it.

No rush though, I'll have to wait until I haul the boat out for the bottom cleaning. In the meantime, guess I'll just sail whenever I can.

thanks again - Sailnet is a great community!

Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proper engine outboard size Slickerish Cheoy Lee 1 07-19-2007 01:49 PM
Reccommended size for name on vessel ericson3054 Announcements and Suggestions Box 4 03-18-2007 07:56 PM
s2 6.9 outboard size crabbysmiles S2 2 08-09-2006 04:51 PM
Caring for the Cruising Outboard Doreen Gounard Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 04-22-2003 08:00 PM
Outboard Motor Brackets Sue & Larry Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 09-04-2002 08:00 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.