Have sailed and anchored in the Chesapeake and its tributaries for over 50 years.
Among the more traditional
anchors, the preferred
anchor is a
Danforth Hi-Tensile or a
Fortress. Both of these work very well if they're deployed properly. On my 42' 28K displacement sloop, I use an "oversized"
Fortress these days....an FX-37. When it sets, you KNOW you're not going to move no matter what. This
anchor is great in the typical clay and mud bottoms encountered, and it is good even in the silt conditions you find, e.g., in the upper Potomac river, particularly when you use the wide setting.
The
Danforth Hi-Tensile is also a very good
anchor for the Chesapeake. The
CQR is NOT. I keep my 45lb genuine
CQR belowdecks when in the Chesapeake. However, when I exit these waters, I keep the
CQR on the bow. It's an excellent
anchor for most bottom conditions found from Maine to the Caribbean. But it's a real dog in parts of the Chesapeake...I've dragged it all over the Potomac.
The newer
anchors may be good, too. Haven't tried them. I have friends who love the Bruce. It's a good
anchor because it sets fast in most conditions, but it can't develop anywhere near the holding power of the
Danforth or
Fortress or the newer
anchors such as the Rocna or the Manson Supreme.
That said, I've sailed in waters from Maine to Grenada and all places in between, and feel that with a 45lb
CQR, a 35lb
Danforth Hi-Tensile, and a
Fortress FX-37...and an all-chain 3/8" hi-tensile
rode....I really don't lust after anything else. Have NEVER had a problem, even in adverse conditions.
Bill