lightning protection - Page 8 - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #71 of 75 Old 09-16-2008
Learning the HARD way...
eherlihy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston / Ft Myers Area
Posts: 5,494
Thanks: 287
Thanked 198 Times in 194 Posts
Rep Power: 11
I just stumbled across this thread and tought that I'dd add a couple more cents...

Faraday cages block static electrical fields. Like lightning. In Hartley's pic above, the fuselage acts as a faraday cage. Faraday cages can not block EMF or Electro Magnetic Feilds.

A good Faraday cage on your boat is the oven (if you have one), or the pressure cooker mentioned above. the CDI box probably IS a Faraday cage, but this one in meant to keep the static IN the box, rather than out, as part of a noise supression circuit (so people with nearby radios don't hear your sparkplugs every time they are fired).

Also - WOW! Waltsn's pic is unreal!
eherlihy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #72 of 75 Old 09-16-2008
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Yup, the designers of the outboard probably didn't worry about it working in a lightning storm. I think if I added a shield around the two wires going to the pickup coil and terminated the shield at the CDI control box, I would have not had any problem with the outboard - but also wouldn't have got any pictures.

Here is a pretty crazy idea (good that its burried way back in this thread) regarding how a lightning upwards leader is formed and possibly has some influence on a sailboats chances of getting hit.

A premise here is that in a lightning event, only air is ionized and water is not because it is at least 80 times as difficult to ionize than air (maybe even thousands of times more difficult to ionize). We could discuss this but I put all this mumbo jumbo in this web site trying to back this idea up ( - cut and paste again )

You can also read this paper (remove the q after the www) but the bottom line of this paper is that the water surface will charge up during a lightning event. The water surface charge is typically positive because electrons have been driven into the bulk of the water. The speed of this charging depends on the salt content in the water. The charging takes nano seconds for salt water and tens of microseconds for very fresh water. The charging of the water surface also completely "encloses" the electric field between the water surface and the charge in the sky.

So the negative charge in the sky or the lightning streamer coming down from the sky creates an electric field which "charges" the water surface.

The crazy theory is that the water at the surface is very difficult to ionize but the air just above the water is much easier to ionize so the air above the charged water surface gets ionized and creates channels for charge to flow. These channels meet up at some place (like under the downward coming streamer) and then head upwards to meet the downward coming streamer. Sort of just the opposite process of the "radial pictures" you can see in the referenced links. Generating a upwards streamer is of course the best way to receive a downwards comming streamer.

The interesting thing about this theory is that it is pretty much only dependent on structures above the water surface which can influence the electric field such as a mast. Or the indentation in the water surface left by a boat hull. Anything under water (such as a grounded keel) has no influence.

Cant back this up with references.. just throwing out something for discussion.
waltsn is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #73 of 75 Old 09-16-2008
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: On The Hurricane Bowl
Posts: 407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11
from my blog here awhile back:

Lightning is a series of several strokes the first being a stepped leader stroke which develops a path from the cloud to the ground sometimes the channels lead nowhere which explains why lightning forks eventually a path is developed from the cloud to the ground and lightning happens..
Once the stepped leader stroke develops a conducting channel to the ground or you get the "Return Streamer" which is a discharge of electricity from the ground to the cloud. This stroke is more brilliant than the leader stroke and is the observed stroke we average of three leader strokes and three return stokes occur in one conducting channel..


the better the channel the more chance of the strike
I'd say not grounded would be safer and moving is even safer than being at dock or anchor.....
Insails is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #74 of 75 Old 09-16-2008
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Quote from this link (some day I may be able to post a link)

As the negatively- charged stepped leader moves downwards, it induces a positive charge on the ground below. When the top of the leader is about 30-100 yards above ground level, the induced positive charge becomes so concentrated that a new spark forms, as shown in Figure 2. This positively charged spark is the crucial process as far as the attachment to a boat is concerned. If it starts at the top of a boat mast, then lightning strikes the mast. Unfortunately, there is no scientifically accepted technique to prevent this spark from forming. Even if a device were effective in diverting the attachment spark, it would not be a good idea to mount it on the masthead as the attachment spark may start elsewhere on the boat or crew. The likelihood of lightning attaching to the masthead is a safety feature as far as crew is concerned.
waltsn is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #75 of 75 Old 09-17-2008
1999 Catalina 36 MkII
anchorsaweigh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New England
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Bottom line is that you could have the most sophisticated grounding/bonding system available. But, if the system isn't independent of the boat (that is, insulated FROM the boat as it is on a house), or if the strike exceeds the capacity of the're screwed.



You can polish a turd, but you just end up with a shiny turd.
anchorsaweigh is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lightning Strike! Kathy Barron Seamanship Articles 0 04-07-2005 08:00 PM
Lightning Strike! Kathy Barron Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 04-07-2005 08:00 PM
Lightning Strike! Kathy Barron Cruising Articles 0 04-07-2005 08:00 PM
Lightning Examined Kevin Hughes Seamanship Articles 0 05-10-2004 08:00 PM
Lightning Protection 101 Sue & Larry Seamanship Articles 0 11-22-1999 07:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome