extending existing BBB anchor chain - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 
  #11  
Old 08-28-2008
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
Yes, but not in a marine setting. Also, have seen them come very close to failing on a boat...where they were partially opened and on the verge of failing, but had not—probably would have failed if they had been anchored for a few more hours.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBurton View Post
So you have seen some of these links that have failed SD?
__________________
Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #12  
Old 08-28-2008
Vitesse473's Avatar
Wannabe Sailing Bum
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
Vitesse473 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaraderie View Post
Galvanised steel.
Connects two chains of same diameter. Use as a temporary chain connection only (SWL* is less than equivalent chain link).

That is enough of a warning for me!
Yep, that's what I was looking for. My Defender catalog says, "Connect 2 lengths of chain. For Temporary or permanent connection." I'll go ahead and pass on the idea of connecting two pieces of BBB. It just isn't worth risking. Although, it does puzzle me that this would be a weak link compared to one of those double ended anchor swivel type devices.

Regarding the anchor selection. I've traded a few emails with the Manson Supreme guys. They said the 45pounder will work, but suggested I go with the 60lbs anchor. That's what I'll do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #13  
Old 08-29-2008
Craig Smith's Avatar
Anchorsmith
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 253
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 9
Craig Smith is on a distinguished road
Arrow

EDITED BY CAM...PURE COMMERCIAL...you are not permitted to disparage other products OR tout your own except in response to a direct question.

If you're looking at replacing the chain, having decided against a joiner, you definitely want to consider abandoning BBB, go to G40 / hi-test. There is no point in all the extra weight of the BBB required to match the desired strength. Put the extra weight into the anchor. On which, even a 60lb anchor is slightly small. Bigger is better. Our conservative sizings recommend the Rocna 33 for your boat, which is 73lb. DELETED
__________________
Craig Smith

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Sailnet Disclosure: Craig is the son of the designer of Rocna and has a financial interest in its success.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #14  
Old 08-29-2008
Vitesse473's Avatar
Wannabe Sailing Bum
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
Vitesse473 is on a distinguished road
Craig - I appreciate your passion for the subject. I too am in sales, and our products are also at the high end of the price spectrum. We have all kinds of cheaper competitors that copy what we do, and then position themselves as a "me too." Some customer's make their choice on price alone, and I never agree with them. However, I sell high-end computer systems containing hundreds of features that I use to sell "value;" by which to then influence a customer's decision. The value sell works, and is a must, when you are the higher priced solution. The challenge you have is that us sailors see a huge chunk of metal, not a complex system. We understand tensile strength, or holding power, or reset capability, but there are very few people that can (or would) look at a comparative holding power chart and say, "gee, Manson only has 70lbs vs Rocna's 140" (as it pertains to holding power per relative size). What we do is ask other sailors, read articles, and forum posts, and then come to what we believe is a logical conclusion.

That said, your solution is priced ~43% higher. Us customers scratch our head and ask ourselves, "if I buy this anchor "knock off", am I putting my crew and boat at risk?" "Am I making a ridiculously poor decision?" "Is this Manson better than the old style anchors (Bruce, CQR, etc), which have been holding boats in place for years?" And then, "Do I want to spend $1000 on a Rocna vs $400 for a Bruce or $600 for Manson?" Stop for a second and think to yourself. Is my product delivering 43% more value (60% over a Bruce), and is there empirical data out there (real world) that justifies my pricing premium?

Essentially, all the research I've done, including speaking with at least a dozen experienced cruisers led me to the conclusion that Rocna's are great anchors, but aren't 43% better than others. In fact, I know I would have been perfectly fine with a Bruce, but I opted for the "new age" style anchor (remember, I'm a technology guy.)

Lastly, I'll make you a deal. You loan me a 73lbs Rocna and I'll take it along on the Ha Ha to compare side by side to the Manson. I have a website/blog (Vitesse473.com), which we'll use to catalog our trip (including gear I've purchased, and how it has performed). I am happy to post info on the Rocna's performance, ease of use, photos, etc. If it proves out, I'll gladly give you the $1000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #15  
Old 08-30-2008
camaraderie's Avatar
moderate?
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 13,877
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 15
camaraderie is a jewel in the rough camaraderie is a jewel in the rough camaraderie is a jewel in the rough
CRAIG - Your most recent post has been deleted and I am posting publicly to acknowledge this deletion.
The RULES here for commercial posters say you cannot promote your own product or slam (and innuendo that another product is an inferior knock off of yours IS disparagement on THIS board if not in the courts)...another's AT ALL unless you are asked a specific question to which you are responding. YOU chose to jump in on a chain thread where no question about your product was asked. That is why you have been edited.
I'm getting tired of your constant self promotion at every opportunity on every anchor related thread. Limit yourself to answering direct questions about your anchors and use factual independent data instead of innuendo if you choose to comment on your competitors in doing so. Or PAY for an AD like other vendors.
__________________
No longer posting. Reach me by PM!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #16  
Old 08-30-2008
MedSailor's Avatar
Closet Powerboater
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anacortes PNW
Posts: 2,955
Thanks: 162
Thanked 74 Times in 65 Posts
Rep Power: 7
MedSailor is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaraderie View Post
CRAIG - Your most recent post has been deleted and I am posting publicly to acknowledge this deletion.
The RULES here for commercial posters say you cannot promote your own product or slam (and innuendo that another product is an inferior knock off of yours IS disparagement on THIS board if not in the courts)...another's AT ALL unless you are asked a specific question to which you are responding. YOU chose to jump in on a chain thread where no question about your product was asked. That is why you have been edited.
I'm getting tired of your constant self promotion at every opportunity on every anchor related thread. Limit yourself to answering direct questions about your anchors and use factual independent data instead of innuendo if you choose to comment on your competitors in doing so. Or PAY for an AD like other vendors.

Thanks Cam for the edit. Craig (and the good moderation of sailnet) is the sole reason I don't bother posting to SSCA and instead enjoy posting here. Craig's posts are also the reason that no matter how good a Rocna is (and I'm not convinced it is) I will NEVER buy one. It'll be a Bruce or Spade for me because of his bad salesmanship and overly aggressive mis-leading posts.
/hijack

Back to the original question:


I am personally a fan of non-standard solutions and rarely do thing's the "right" way just because I'm told to, so now that you know that is my slant let me ask you a couple questions:

The chain link you describe is not designed as a permanent solution and is not the "right" way to ensure that everything with your ground tackle is bombproof. Will it work? Yeah, probably it'll work just fine but it depends on what keeps you up at night and what you're willing to spend. If you were stuck on the idea I'd just make sure to inspect it occasionally and if it doesn't keep you up at night, great. I personally wouldn't do it because I like my ground tackle to be strong, well designed and oversized. When that one big blow opened up I would be imagining (while trying to sleep) it getting cross loaded over a rock and popping open or something like that.

I also WOULD expect it to jam in your windlass. I added zip tied to my chain before my last trip and the added width of a zip tie on 3/8 chain caused the windlass to not let go of the chain and jam in the windlass 40-50% of the time. PITA. I find gypsies are REALLY picky about chain size, uniformity, etc etc. Is the connector EXACTLY the same size? Will it sit at exactly the same orientation? I expect it will jam. An annoyance more than anything but an annoyance all the same.

Why are you upgrading your anchor setup? Is what you have keeping you up at night? Is your goal to have more holding power and a stronger safer anchor setup? If so I think you could re-approprate the same amount of money and avoid the chain. Buy a used delta for example, or get chain from an industrial supplier. Used chain perhaps.

Why more chain? Chain, in and of itself, does not mean more holding power. Chain allows you to have the same holding power with less scope payed out and gives more chafe resistance. ie chain does not make your anchor hold stronger but rather allows you to anchor in deeper and more crowded harbors with the same holding power.

Finally, what are the limitations of your proposed upgrade? Is it cost? Weight? Storage space? Anchor roller configuration? Take a look at what you're after and what your limitations are. You currently have plenty of chain for chafe resistance and to assist in setting. If all you're after is a stronger setup with more holding power put all your budget into a HUGE anchor. I'll stay out of the debate as to which one but will offer to go with the tried and tested ones not knockoffs. Bruce, Spade, Delta whatever. You might get much better results with your current rode and n 88lb delta for example. Too big? No such thing. It weighs less than a 44lb plus your new chain and costs less too and will have a higher holding power.

If it's reduced swinging in a crowded anchorage you're after than chain (weight in your rode) is what you want. In this case perhaps you could buy a new length of chain and saving money else ware as previously suggested. What about sticking with your current anchor for now and just buying the extra chain?

Just some thoughts to help confuse you further. I doubt you'll be risking anyone's life by using the temporary link but I bet you can achieve your upgrading goals without taking a chance on it.

MedSailor
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


I have a sauna on my boat, therefore I win.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by MedSailor; 08-30-2008 at 11:06 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #17  
Old 11-14-2013
older salt
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
rbaron is on a distinguished road
Re: extending existing BBB anchor chain

Note recent tests by Cox Engineering. Drop forged heated links such as Peerless/acco [sold as Seafit by west marine] are as strong as the links of chain they splice. This does not address issues of rust, and gypsy jumping however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #18  
Old 11-14-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Orleans Louisiana
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 6
Thanked 55 Times in 52 Posts
Rep Power: 3
Stumble is on a distinguished road
Re: extending existing BBB anchor chain

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbaron View Post
Note recent tests by Cox Engineering. Drop forged heated links such as Peerless/acco [sold as Seafit by west marine] are as strong as the links of chain they splice. This does not address issues of rust, and gypsy jumping however.
The problem with these tests is they test new chain with new linkages. Because of the extra surface area, cracks, no visible areas, they just are not as secure long term. The same test a year later it is likely the same, but three years down the road who knows.
__________________
Greg Rubin
Attorney
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Add Inspection Port to Existing Tank mlitzkow Gear & Maintenance 4 03-22-2008 04:06 AM
Help me pick chain for my anchor jasonr575 Cruising & Liveaboard Forum 20 05-04-2007 07:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.