- Quick Menu
-
|

09-25-2008
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Satellite Compass -- GPS Antenna
Why does a satellite compass cost $3,500? My basic Furuno GP32 GPS unit for $250 gives accurate satellite heading info, so why would anyone spring for a sat compass? Just curious.
Also, is there any advantage to mounting a GPS antenna on the mast? Might there be a universal antenna that I can mast-mount that will last for a few years? I don't have a pole or an arch so my antenna is clamped to the rail in the cockpit. It gets in the way. Thank you.
|

09-25-2008
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 421
Rep Power: 12
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure you don't want to mount a GPS antenna on the top of the mast. It moves around too much.
|

09-25-2008
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
|
LoTech-
A GPS doesn't actually give you heading information unless the boat is moving, and it only gives you the direction the boat is moving in, not the direction the boat is pointed in.
For instance, if you're pointed due north, 0˚ and moving at five knots, but have a two knot current from the east, a compass or satellite compass will report your heading as 0˚, where the GPS would have your heading be around 348˚, which is not accurate. The GPS will give you the CMG, not the heading of the boat.
As for mast mounting it... I wouldn't recommend mounting the GPS antenna too high, especially on a monohull. The higher up the GPS antenna is mounted, the more radically it is affected by the boat's motion. Imagine what happens if the boat rolls through 30˚ as commonly happens on a tack, the antenna at deck or cabin top level doesn't do much... but at the spreaders, it ends up moving through a pretty big arc.
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|

09-25-2008
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 144
Rep Power: 6
|
|
|
Hi
I wont repeat the information in the two previous posts, just add..
A satellite compass will give true heading not magnetic heading.
It can replace a gyro compass on comersial boats and i think the primary market for the $3,500 satellite compass are professional boats. Gyro compasses are also costly items.
|

09-25-2008
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,490
Rep Power: 7
|
|
|
I have a KMV AC105 fluxgate, a Raymarine chartplotter and a Ritchie Globemaster. Realistically, it is the fluxgate that is most accurate compass. I would consider a satellite compass for the reasons given above, and because I have a steel boat and it might be quite difficult to have the Ritchie "reswung" for the Southern Hemisphere. It's perfect at the moment in all directions (10.5 degree W variation), but I might not notice fluctuations in other parts of the world.
I freely admit a satellite compas is more than most need, as the error in a compass bearing over a short distance is rarely an issue. An error on a 1,000 mile passage can be dangerous, and more information is good.
|

09-25-2008
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Smithfield, RI
Posts: 955
Rep Power: 4
|
|
|
I'm not sure I follow the logic of not mounting the GPS antenna on the masthead. I agree that it's not the best place, but not for the reasons stated.
Each GPS satellite orbits at an altitude of 20200 kilometers and moves at a speed of about 14000 km/hour. Whether the antenna is at seal level, or 50 feet up, or 100 feet up is of no consequence at all. Yes, the changes in the heel and pitch of the boat are exaggerated at the mast head, but this is still negligible compared to the speed of the sats.
With WAAS and a clear day with 12 birds in view (pretty normal for a sailboat), you can achieve an accuracy maybe as good as 14 feet. If the idea is that having the mast head outside the rail when viewed from the top impacts where the GPS says you are, I would not worry too much.
For these reasons, there is no harm in putting it there, but also there is no benefit for the same reasons.
The only big concern I would have about the mast head mount is the length of the feed wire, which is going to be lossy. If you are mounting an entire receiver up there then this is not an issue as the unit is sending data down the wire. If it is an actual antenna, use a good quality feedline and it should be fine.
Of course, space on the masthead is at a premium. Seems a waste to put a GPS antenna up there. This, and the feedline issue, are why I would not put the GPS antenna on the mast head.
|

09-25-2008
|
 |
Arf!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 606
Rep Power: 11
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog
LoTech-
As for mast mounting it... I wouldn't recommend mounting the GPS antenna too high, especially on a monohull. The higher up the GPS antenna is mounted, the more radically it is affected by the boat's motion. Imagine what happens if the boat rolls through 30˚ as commonly happens on a tack, the antenna at deck or cabin top level doesn't do much... but at the spreaders, it ends up moving through a pretty big arc.
|
I think you are on the wrong tack here. What matters for a GPS antenna is not its position, but where in the sky it is pointing. If the angle changes, you may lose some of the satellites. And the angle change is the same for the stern rail and the mast head.
__________________
Fluctuat nec mergitur
|

09-25-2008
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 1,809
Rep Power: 9
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valiente
I would consider a satellite compass for the reasons given above, and because I have a steel boat and it might be quite difficult to have the Ritchie "reswung" for the Southern Hemisphere. It's perfect at the moment in all directions (10.5 degree W variation), but I might not notice fluctuations in other parts of the world.
|
The variation is dictated by your geographical location and is accounted for when doing stuff like calculating CTS. Deviation is dependant on the magnetism built into the boat and doesn't change unless something in the boat changes. So a change in geographical location will not require the compass to be re-swung no matter which hemisphere you're in.
What can change from N to S is that the card in the compass has a tiny little weight on the underside that keeps the card level. When you change from one hemisphere to another, it is POSSIBLE that the card will lie at a strange angle brought about by large changes in magnetic variation from one hemisphere to another but the headings will not change in terms of deviation.
If the compass is a good quality one, then this problem shouldn't manifest itself (mine didn't from US to NZ). I had a bulkhead compass (Suunto, so not junk) years ago on which the card was at a daft angle and the compass repairers didn't want to try and fix it - don't know why. I eventually threw it out.
Oh and I know that the fluxgate in my autopilot can be calibrated to match the deviation in the steering compass. Don't know if your fluxgate can or not but worth bearing in mind in case someone has fiddled with it.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
"Two possibilities exist: Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying."
Arthur C. Clarke
|

09-25-2008
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
JArcher/Pegasus-
If that were the case, why would the Garmin antenna mounting instructions say this:
Quote:
On a sailboat, avoid mounthing the GPS 17x antenna high on the mast, to prevent inaccurate speed readings caused by excessive heeling.
The GPS 17x antenna provides more-stable readings when located nearer to water level.
|
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|

09-26-2008
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,490
Rep Power: 7
|
|
|
Thanks, Andre. It's early days yet...frankly, I have all the necessary bearings for my local sailing memorized in M and T.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.
|