dinghy outboard: Honda 2.0HP vs Mercury 3.5HP - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 
  #11  
Old 10-19-2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
121Guy is on a distinguished road
Honda 2HP

We too have the 2HP Honda short shaft with centrifugal clutch. Have used it for four seasons with no problems whatsoever. Use it to push a 12 foot air floor inflatable. It does not allow the dinghy to plane but that was not our goal. It will push the dinghy with 4 people around for a couple of hours at half throttle without worrying about fuel. It uses a great amount more at close to full throttle. Here are some things we think Honda should consider to make it a better product. It is very loud at anything more than idle. It does not offer a remote gas tank hookup option. It does not offer any options on improving the plastic prop.

One thing not mentioned on the plus side is that as a Honda, it should run forever with good care. It has to be the easiest engine I ever worked on for oil change, gear lube change and overall maintenance. Also, it claims to be the cleanest running (lowest polluting) gasoline engine made.

If I had it to do over again I would strongly consider the next largest Honda. I think, but am not certain, that at the time it was a 5 HP and was roughly $200 more. It had reverse and a remote tank....but was heavier and consumed quite a bit more fuel.

Good luck with your choice.

121 Guy
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #12  
Old 10-19-2008
Valiente's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Valiente has a spectacular aura about Valiente has a spectacular aura about
It's nice to see measured advice here full of real-world information. The Honda, being at one end of the weight/convenience spectrum, has design aspects "not for everyone", and yet not everyone uses their tender the same way.

The "leaping into forward" thing on the neutral-less Honda concerned me...until I actually tried it! You can grip a dock or simply loop a line to defeat it, but me, I just aim the boat and let 'er rip!

The other aspect of this, of course, is that I don't see the Honda as a small outboard so much as a "big, tireless rower": I frequently will row away from the boat first to see if there's wind or traffic nearby that needs to see me...then I will fire up the Honda and be on my way.

I have done the 180 degree flip thing and gone dead astern and I would say this works marginally better than "reverse" on a standard outboard. I have also simply done slow circles to stay "on station" if I am fiddling with a radio or something.

Anyway, the ease of use and portability trump this model's "little ways", but I can see that if you left the engine on the dinghy on occasion, or if you were regularly pushing 4 people or half a dozen diesel jugs, a more beefy, more standard small outboard would be a better choice.

This suits us at the moment, but that could change. An air-cooled 3.5 HP at 35 lbs. would be near perfect, for instance.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #13  
Old 10-20-2008
all these confusing ropes
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 166
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
dohenyboy is on a distinguished road
in the same situation as you, I have gone with an electric trolling motor. much cheaper, even with buying a small agm battery.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #14  
Old 10-20-2008
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
The real problem with this is that you have a very limited run time... and what do you think will happen if your battery dies in a harbor with stronger currents? Hope you packed the oars. BTW, if you do run the battery down below the 50% point too often, it will die very, very quickly.

With a gasoline powered dinghy outboard, you can just re-fuel the engine, and you'll have a good long run time. With the Tohatsu 3.5 HP, the 1/3 of a gallon gives you about 1 hour of run time or so. With 2.5 Gallon jerry can of gasoline aboard, you've got over eight hours of run time, assuming the outboard's tank was full to start with.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dohenyboy View Post
in the same situation as you, I have gone with an electric trolling motor. much cheaper, even with buying a small agm battery.
__________________
Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #15  
Old 10-20-2008
billangiep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida Gulf Coast
Posts: 295
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11
billangiep is on a distinguished road
Another consideration for those looking for small outboards is the Suzuki 2.5. 2.5 Suzuki

DF2.5 Specifications

Model Name: DF2.5S
Horse Power: 2.5
Shaft: 15
Displacement: 4.15 cu. in. (68 cc)
Weight: 29
Cylinders: 1
Ignition: Suzuki PEI
Bore X Stroke: 1.89 x 1.50 in. (48 x 38 mm)
RPM Range: 5250-5750
Maximum RPM: 5750
Starter: MStart w/Man. Choke
Oil Tank Capacity: .32 qt. (.3 lit.)


Fuel: Unleaded
Gear Ratio: 2.15:1
Standard Propeller: 3 X 7 1/2 X 5 1/2
Steering: Tiller
__________________
You start sailing with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The idea is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #16  
Old 10-20-2008
Valiente's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Valiente has a spectacular aura about Valiente has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
With 2.5 Gallon jerry can of gasoline aboard, you've got over eight hours of run time, assuming the outboard's tank was full to start with.
Yes, this negated for me the need for a separate fuel tank. If I am 45 minutes of full throttle away from the shore at anchor in hairy conditions, (think three NM away!) I wouldn't use the tender in the first place: I would bring the boat inshore and temp anchor or seek a wharf.

I have confirmed in the open lake in rolly conditions that I have closer to an hour of run time on my Honda 2 with the one-litre integral tank, but I'm assuming 45 minutes full out for a safety factor.

Refilling isn't an issue even in those conditions (I've done it with Zodiacs during jug-to-tank refills on long runs), and a one-gallon jug is laughably small compared to the sort of jugs I carry for the "mothership"....but that one gallon gives me THREE HOURS or 15 NM in flat water of range, with two refills along the way.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #17  
Old 10-20-2008
JIO JIO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
JIO is on a distinguished road
I purchased the Honda 2hp this summer for my Mercury 310 airdeck. I went for this model due to the light weight of the motor. I have been pleased with the selection and with my wife and 2 young kids in tow, it moves along at a reasonable speed.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #18  
Old 10-20-2008
tonybinTX's Avatar
not-so-old salt
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St. Augustine
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
tonybinTX is on a distinguished road
I've the Honda 2hp on an 8ft zodiac air floor. Again - no planing. I use it to troll a line around the inlets and when we go out for a night or two on the lake to get our German Shepherd to the bank.

There is a mod to convert it to a tank system.

I don't have an issue with starting. Just be sure to be sitting down when you yank on the starter and you'll do fine.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
"The God I believe in isn't short of cash, Mister." - Bono
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #19  
Old 07-18-2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
MajorMischief is on a distinguished road
We too purchased the Honda 2HP with centrifugal clutch a few years ago... not for a dingy but as the auxiliary for our Precision-18. The major advantages are: low weight and simple maintenance (since it does not have a water pump). The major disadvantages are: difficult to operate at very low speeds since the clutch disengages and the necessity to top up the fuel tank before heading in (so you don't run out of gas in a busy harbor). With a displacement hull, our boat would not have been any happier with a more powerful engine. The Honda 2HP powers the Precision-18 close to hull speed!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #20  
Old 05-07-2011
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
jamesbence is on a distinguished road
We have both the honda 2.3 and the merc 3.5... there are pro's and cons with each
the honda will just about plane the dinghy with a 10 stone guy in it (me) performance wise the merc is far better at getting the dinghy on the plane and much more solidly built... I have found both engines perfectly reliable
A downside with the honda is that the recoil start is very snatchy and the clutch is the same but it is more portable and air cooled which makes it a bit noisy but with obvious maintainance benefits. I also have a sealine s 21 which broke down and beleive it or not the merc pushed me to the safety of the harbour with no issues I would pic the merc any day despite the fact its a little heavier but both are excellent portable engines
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Choosing a Dinghy Sue & Larry Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 10-11-2004 08:00 PM
Choosing a Dinghy Sue & Larry Cruising Articles 0 10-09-1998 08:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.