Confusing plumbing configuration -- thoughts? - Page 2 - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of Old 12-30-2008
Senior Mumble
 
jbondy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 15
 
I may be wrong, but it seems to me the output from the tank can lead to a T rather than a diverter. One side of the T leads to the macerator pump and then to a seacock/thruhull. The other side of the T leads to the deck pumpout fitting. When pumping out via macerator, the macerator will suck waste from the tank and not suck air thru the pumpout fitting because the deck fitting will be closed. When waste is being sucked out thru the deck fitting, there shouldn't be any back flow thru the macerator because the seacock will be closed. The diverter valves have been prone to failure in my experience. A T fitting is simpler and more reliable. KISS!
jbondy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of Old 12-30-2008
Spam, Food of the Seagods
 
Gryzio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
First I wanted to say K.I.S.S.

Many have given the "Keep it simple Simeon"

I just wanted to take a stab at what the previous owner "may" had in mind here.

This looks to be an attempt at the "Maceration Re-Macerator Flabergastor"

What I am thinking, where the macerator pumps back toward the head.

This supposed to be manipulated in a way that the pump recirculates the holding tank contents from holding tank and then back into the holding tank!

This provides a fine chop to the holding tank and maybe additional aeration???

This is just a guess to help provide some insights as to previous owner thoughts.

But, I think some parts may be missing to work correctly.

All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full.
Ecclesiastes, 1:7
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Gryzio is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of Old 12-30-2008
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
The main reason I generally recommend using a diverter valve, rather than a Y or T splitter, is that when you're in an NDZ, the authorities will want to see the handle locked to the deck pumpout fitting.

Also, if you have a splitter rather than a diverter valve, and you leave the discharge seacock open when you go to pump out, you'll suction water up through the macerator pump and that may make it take a much longer time to empty your holding tank as well as damage the macerator pump.

The diverter valve also makes it less likely that you'll siphon water through an open seacock back into the holding tank.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbondy View Post
I may be wrong, but it seems to me the output from the tank can lead to a T rather than a diverter. One side of the T leads to the macerator pump and then to a seacock/thruhull. The other side of the T leads to the deck pumpout fitting. When pumping out via macerator, the macerator will suck waste from the tank and not suck air thru the pumpout fitting because the deck fitting will be closed. When waste is being sucked out thru the deck fitting, there shouldn't be any back flow thru the macerator because the seacock will be closed. The diverter valves have been prone to failure in my experience. A T fitting is simpler and more reliable. KISS!

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of Old 12-30-2008
Senior Mumble
 
jbondy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 15
 
Am I not OK with the authorities as long as I locked the waste-out seacock handle? The rest has to do with diligence.
jbondy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #15 of Old 12-30-2008
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
That should do the trick too...
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbondy View Post
Am I not OK with the authorities as long as I locked the waste-out seacock handle? The rest has to do with diligence.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #16 of Old 12-30-2008
Senior Member
 
poopdeckpappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,050
Thanks: 34
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Rep Power: 10
   
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubb2 View Post
I am wondering if it is plumbed this way as a way to rinse the holding tank after it was pumped. I could see that it would work if the holding tank was below the water line.
I agree, looks like a way to flush the holding tank either offshore or at the pumpout

1955 Blanchard 51 Custom ( I got a woody )

On the 8th day God created sailors and evil stood at attention
poopdeckpappy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #17 of Old 12-30-2008
S/V Loon
 
TaylorC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seattle & Whidbey Island
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I agree with Sailingdog - head direct to tank, tank out to a Y-valve to either the deck or the discharge pump which goes overboard.

I wonder if the pump is attached to the discharge leg of the current setup, rather than the head leg. If it were, and the Y valve was set for head to tank, the pump would be set up to go overboard.

I cruise on Canada's West Coast, where overboard discharge is still allowed except in specific areas, and the advantage of always sending waste to the holding tank is that I can pick when and where I discharge the tank, which allows me to avoid sensitive areas and spread my impact over a larger volume of water.
TaylorC is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #18 of Old 12-30-2008
Senior Member
 
hellosailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,313
Thanks: 4
Thanked 128 Times in 125 Posts
Rep Power: 11
   
I love the macerator being set up to push INTO the head, and the option to have the holding tank used as a water SUPPLY for the head.

Surely, that's an April Fools diagram?
hellosailor is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #19 of Old 12-30-2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 262
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
I know this is academic since you are rebuilding the system, but I had another thought. Perhaps the PO set this up to empty holding tank. With the system as I understand it you could use the head pump as an overboard discharge device if the macerater pump failed. By flushing the head with the holding tank contents and the discharge seacock open you could bypass a failed direct over board discharge system. This would be nasty, but would be a way to empty the holding tank if all else failed. I am not saying pumping raw sewage open to the cabin via the head bowl is a good idea, but it might work.
baboon is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #20 of Old 12-30-2008 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
CLucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glen Head, NY
Posts: 456
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Send a message via AIM to CLucas
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellosailor View Post
I love the macerator being set up to push INTO the head, and the option to have the holding tank used as a water SUPPLY for the head.

Surely, that's an April Fools diagram?
Wish it were, but I assure you it's no joke. With the diverter on the discharge leg set to the discharge thru-hull, waste is pumped overboard -- with the valve set to the tank, then it's effectively a closed loop. Holding tank as a water supply to the head is gross, but as some have suggested, could be used to rinse the tank after a pump-out.

This is effectively going to be a do-over, and something to thank the PO for (that and the half-filled holding tank -- nice touch).

s/v Grey Goose
1977 Pearson 30 #995
~~~~~~_/) ~~~~~~

Last edited by CLucas; 12-30-2008 at 08:29 PM.
CLucas is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Head Plumbing mwrohde Gear & Maintenance 7 06-13-2008 03:22 PM
Thoughts on Bristol 47.7 & Beneteau dougship Boat Review and Purchase Forum 6 06-07-2006 06:57 AM
Boat Plumbing Inspection Tom Wood Buying a Boat Articles 0 02-17-2004 07:00 PM
Boat Plumbing Inspection Tom Wood Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 02-17-2004 07:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome