Garmin 4208 or 3210 chart plotter? 4208 may have too much gimicktry... - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 12 Old 02-02-2009 Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Garmin 4208 or 3210 chart plotter? 4208 may have too much gimicktry...

Hello,

I am putting together my electronics package.

I will be adding chart plotter with sattelite weather feed, AIS and maybe radar.

The 4208 or 4210 -latest garmin stuff has a lot of features but I don't think I need them. I am used to the older stuff as well so I think I may try to find a 3210 instead.

Anyone have an opinion or experience on these things?
sharedwatch is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 Old 02-02-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: wherever
Posts: 5,283
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
bought a 3210 last summer. works great altho we don't have any of the bells & whistles, only plotter. well, we have the radar but haven't run the wiring yet
The plotter is very nice but all I can compare it to is small handhelds

I think I'd go for the bigger screen if you have the room for it

Last edited by xort; 02-02-2009 at 05:54 PM.
xort is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 12 Old 02-02-2009
Member
 
lbdavis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 9
 
I've got a 3206 and I love it. It has more features than I need and is upgradeable (is that a word?) with radar, weather overlay, whatever you'd like to add down the road.

As I understand it, the big difference in the two lines (32xx/42xx) is that the 42xx is NMEA 2K and the 32xx is the old tried and true NMEA 0183.

Others will be able to shed more light, I'm sure.

S/V Gracie
P303
lbdavis is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 12 Old 02-03-2009
Grasshopper
 
JiffyLube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I have the 3210, and I've played with the later models. The one thing I find easier to use on the later models is touching the screen to get information or to set waypoints, but I don't care for the screen being cluttered with touch buttons. The 3210 screen scrolling feature would be better if it was a ball mouse, but I've read that there are problems sometimes with the ball mouse on the Raymarine plotters.
JiffyLube is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 12 Old 02-03-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sw florida
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Chartplotters

I have dual 3010's on my 45' sloop, one up at the helm and one down at the nav station. With the GMS port expander there isn't anything it can't do. There is even a remote available for it,(can't imagine why). With 2 plotters one will automatically go into slave mode. The touch screens have issues being in direct sunlight down here in Florida. I have been using the 3010's since 05' and have about 10,000 miles on them without a problem. The XM weather works as far as St Thomas and with the up graded Gsd 22 the sonar works better. I don't know what you will get for spending the extra money on a 4 series system. Good luck in your choice.
funsailthekeys is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 12 Old 02-03-2009
Senior Member
 
BarryL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 4
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
Rep Power: 13
 
Nmea 2000

Hello,

If I were buying any electronic today, I would insist on NMEA 2000. It is much easier to connect things, no need to cut and splice, etc. So if the newer unit supports NMEA 2000 and the older unit doesn't, that would make my choice easy.

Barry

Barry Lenoble
Deep Blue C, 2002 C&C 110
Mt. Sinai, NY

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BarryL is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 12 Old 02-03-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sw florida
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
All the connections on the 3 series are LAN connections except for power and the GPS. I guess that is the right terminology.
funsailthekeys is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 12 Old 02-03-2009
Sea Slacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
I chose 3210 specifically because it has the "old" Garmin interface which I find much clearer, easier to use and more flexible. New interface is aimed at, how shall I put it, people who don't really navigate well, I guess.

NMEA 2000 in my personal opinion is a protocol that is a "solution looking for a problem", and is not useful at all on a sailboat. (That and serial protocols are considerably more resilient in face of marginal connections and variable power conditions often encountered on a boat than Ethernet).
brak is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 12 Old 02-04-2009
Senior Member
 
BarryL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 4
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
Rep Power: 13
 
Nmea

Quote:
Originally Posted by brak View Post
NMEA 2000 in my personal opinion is a protocol that is a "solution looking for a problem", and is not useful at all on a sailboat. (That and serial protocols are considerably more resilient in face of marginal connections and variable power conditions often encountered on a boat than Ethernet).
Wow, I could not disagree more.

With NMEA0183, you need to solder, crimp, twist, or make the electrical connection some other way. You need to figure out which device is the sender and which is the receiver. If you want to connect multiple devices, or send the same data to more than one device (like having speed displayed at the helm and down below) you need yet more things.

With NMEA2000, when you want to connect two devices, you just connect them with twist lock connectors. There is no soldering, crimping, or other things that can go bad. If you add another device later, you just install a T connector and you're done. It doesn't get easier than that.

Barry

Barry Lenoble
Deep Blue C, 2002 C&C 110
Mt. Sinai, NY

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BarryL is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 12 Old 02-04-2009
Sea Slacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryL View Post
Wow, I could not disagree more.

With NMEA0183, you need to solder, crimp, twist, or make the electrical connection some other way. You need to figure out which device is the sender and which is the receiver. If you want to connect multiple devices, or send the same data to more than one device (like having speed displayed at the helm and down below) you need yet more things.

With NMEA2000, when you want to connect two devices, you just connect them with twist lock connectors. There is no soldering, crimping, or other things that can go bad. If you add another device later, you just install a T connector and you're done. It doesn't get easier than that.

Barry
I think you are mixing up specific details of physical interface and protocol implementation. There is nothing that prevents equipment manufacturers from providing a uniform serial connector - but generally speaking this was not done for historical reasons.

The ethernet cable requires connectors simply because ethernet signal will be lost using the kind of connections that are often result from manually made "crimps, solders" etc. Just that fact alone should tell you something about resilience of protocols in face of real world conditions.

The same goes for adding devices. While the ethernet connection is deceptively simple in appearance, there is far more going on under the hood. Essentially your devices must act as network bridges to move traffic around.

I am sure that both the sales methods of manufacturers and the "packaging" they use make NMEA2000 appear "easy" and more user friendly, but as a technology it simply isn't so.
brak is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chart plotter badsanta Gear & Maintenance 5 11-19-2008 09:52 PM
All About Charts Jim Sexton Learning to Sail Articles 0 11-28-2004 07:00 PM
All About Charts Jim Sexton Seamanship Articles 0 11-28-2004 07:00 PM
All About Charts Jim Sexton Her Sailnet Articles 0 11-28-2004 07:00 PM
Electronic Charts 101 Jim Sexton Cruising Articles 0 10-29-1999 08:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome