Radar - Stern Mount or Mast Mount - Page 3 - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Wannabe Sailing Bum
 
Vitesse473's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I opted for a mast mount (RayM 4kw installed in '08). Personally, I don't like the stern mounts for several reasons (most personal). Having it up on the mast is a set it and forget proposition. Radar technology is not that great as it is, especially so on sailboats. I wanted height to help maximise target acquisition, and I don't regret the decision at all. I certainly, and most importantly, wanted to avoid contact with the radar beam. Case in point, our baby monitor goes schizo when the (home) microwave is on, and it's 10 feet away, and not 4kw. Yikes! The suggestion of simply putting it in standby mode is not an option. Turning them on/off is bad for the microwave device, and will shorten its lifespan. And, crew is not likely to do that anyway.

As for climbing the mast. Well, can't comment as I had my mast taken down for the installation. I would say that I think mounting it from a bosuns chair would be very difficult.

Lastly, the genoa does not get stuck unless poor technique is applied. Most people when tacking will blow the jib as they start the tack, which is terrible technique (and bad for the sail). If you wait until almost in irons to blow the jib sheet, 1) the jib will still be driving the boat forward and 2) less sheeting in on the other board, which means the jib will flog a lot less (if at all).
Vitesse473 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Senior Mumble
 
jbondy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 15
 
I hope this isn't considered a hijack, but what is the potential for "damage" from the radome's radiation? Is this real, or akin to the concerns about cellphones causing brain cancer? If real, then it should factor into placement (and since I went backstay mount, means I wasted $s, but it won't be the first time). If not, it's just a distraction.
jbondy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #23 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Best Looking MALE Mod
 
Cruisingdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,917
Thanks: 3
Thanked 123 Times in 57 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbondy View Post
I hope this isn't considered a hijack, but what is the potential for "damage" from the radome's radiation? Is this real, or akin to the concerns about cellphones causing brain cancer? If real, then it should factor into placement (and since I went backstay mount, means I wasted $s, but it won't be the first time). If not, it's just a distraction.
I do not think it is a hijack as it directly relates to the placement of the dome.

I honestly do not believe anyone knows whether it is harmful or not. I think there are a lot of guesses, but that is it. I tell you that it does bother me - real or imaginary. I have always heard that it is good practice to turn your radar off before entering a marina and to never look at a dome/array while it is running. Now, is there scientific proof that it will hurt you?? I doubt anyone has done a study of it. The cost of doing such a study would be extraordinary and you can be certain that a manufacturer of Radars sure won't support it. So, you are stuck with making your decision based on folklore and old wives tales, I guess.

Just my opinions... unless someone definitively knows better.

Brian

Sailnet Moderator



1987 Tayana Vancouver 42, Credendo Vides, (Mom and Pops boat, F/T Mobile Live Aboards in Puget Sound)

My Website:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Follow My Blog at:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Follow me on Facebook:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Cruisingdad is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #24 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Courtney the Dancer
 
jrd22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Juan Islands., WA, USA
Posts: 3,883
Thanks: 4
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 15
 
I have always had mast mounted radar on the sailboats I've owned and have never had a problem with the genoa getting hung up on them. I have a power boat that has a 4KW radome at about 10' above waterline and I really can't see a lot of difference between the sailboat 4KW which is app. 25' and the lower one. Coming into our marina is a very narrow channel and I get about the same detail on both boats on 1/4NM range (maybe a little better in the power boat, but it's also a brand new radar), and when on the higher ranges (I rarely use much above 8NM here) they both seem to pick up targets equally well. I'm sure that the mast mounted would be more effective in picking up a target at the maximum ranges. The mast mounted gets it out of the cockpit and gives you more room for a wind gen, solar, etc. As far as servicing and installation goes, I built my own ss mast mount and installed it from the chair, not a big deal on the last boat but keel stepped you would probably have to pull the stick to run the cable. Based on my experience I don't have a strong opinion either way based on performance, but if I was planning on putting a wind gen and solar panels and antennas on the stern I'd probably opt for the mast just to declutter. It seems to me that MaineSail had a thread about this and he strongly favored mast mount, and he probably uses radar as much, or more, than I do.

John
SV Laurie Anne

1988 Brewer 40 Pilothouse

jrd22 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #25 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Wannabe Sailing Bum
 
Vitesse473's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruisingdad View Post
I honestly do not believe anyone knows whether it is harmful or not. I think there are a lot of guesses, but that is it.
When I see something like this in the front of the Raymarine users guide, I would err on the safe side and heed their advice. I imagine the engineers have seen some pretty freaky stuff while testing these products. Ultimately, radomes emit a signal at a 25 degree angle, so 12.5 degrees below horizontal centerline. If you have that from stern to bow plus factoring the height of a tall person, than all is well.

From Raymarine User Guide, Page 5:
Radio Frequency Radiation Hazard
The radar antenna emits electromagnetic radio frequency
(RF) energy which can be harmful particularly to your eyes.
DO NOT look at the antenna at close range.
It is important that the radar is turned off whenever
personnel are required to come close to the scanner
assembly or associated equipment. It is recommended that
the radar scanner is mounted out of range of personnel
(above head height).
Distances from the face of the radar at which RF radiation
Vitesse473 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #26 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Senior Mumble
 
jbondy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 15
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitesse473 View Post
When I see something like this in the front of the Raymarine users guide, I would err on the safe side and heed their advice.
I had not noticed that in the manual. I agree with you re erring on the side of caution. Although I can't help but wonder if it doesn't fall into the category of the warning on the side of the McDonald's coffee cups that the coffee is hot. (Maybe that's not a good example, it IS hot.) Anyway, radar is not a new technology. Is the danger real? Or is it a theoretical danger? With all the boats in a busy marina with their arrays spinning and all of us looking at them admiringly... Are we risking our vision?

I went with the stern mount but will plan on moving it to the mast. I don't want to be responsible for frying my family.
jbondy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #27 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
old guy :)
 
rikhall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 13
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vitesse473 View Post
When I see something like this in the front of the Raymarine users guide,
Please - I am not in favour of turning on your radar and sitting on the raydome or anything of the sort.

But, the warning in the manual has about as much weight with me as the warning on the take-out cup of coffee that says

"Danger - may contain hot liquids!"

Duh!

Too many lawyers, not enough somethings.

I helped my buddy bring his first power boat from where he bought it to where he lives. The first time I stood at the helm to bring it into the dock for him, and the radar was on, it made my hearing aide beep. I looked around and there was the radome on the arch - about eye level and about ten inches from my head.

I quickly sat down and let my buddy take it into the harbor. I figured it was about time he learned to dock his own darn boat!

Rik

Irwin Citation 34
Mystery
rikhall is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #28 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Wannabe Sailing Bum
 
Vitesse473's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbondy View Post
With all the boats in a busy marina with their arrays spinning and all of us looking at them admiringly... Are we risking our vision?
No boat owner should have his/her radar on in a marina. It's bad for the seagulls, and equally bad for the equipment to run with all that clutter around. Atleast that's what my technician said.

I just thought it was odd that the manual specifically stated damage to the eyes. That means they noted something specific during testing and qualification. Probably using rats or pigs as subjects.
Vitesse473 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #29 of 35 Old 03-17-2009
Old Fart
 
DwayneSpeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pasco, WA, USA
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 12
 
I have a stern mount pole you can have for next to nothing but the shipping may be prohibitive and you most assuredly will have to modify the lower end to fit your boat. If you want it I can send photos.

I use a self leveling system that attaches to a small pole run up next to my rear stay. It works well for me.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Hey, can one of you guys pass me a crab?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DwayneSpeer is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #30 of 35 Old 03-18-2009
Senior Member
 
Valiente's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
   
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruisingdad View Post
I do not think it is a hijack as it directly relates to the placement of the dome.

I honestly do not believe anyone knows whether it is harmful or not. I think there are a lot of guesses, but that is it. I tell you that it does bother me - real or imaginary. I have always heard that it is good practice to turn your radar off before entering a marina and to never look at a dome/array while it is running. Now, is there scientific proof that it will hurt you?? I doubt anyone has done a study of it. The cost of doing such a study would be extraordinary and you can be certain that a manufacturer of Radars sure won't support it. So, you are stuck with making your decision based on folklore and old wives tales, I guess.

Just my opinions... unless someone definitively knows better.

Brian
I do not definitely know better, but I recall a scene from the Jerzy Kosinski novel "Cockpit", where the sadistic main character convinces a woman he is photographing to stand in front of a fighter jet's running radar in order to give her a cancer-inducing dose of radiation...

I later found out that was implausible, but have always resisted the idea of voluntarily putting my body in front of a running radome!

Can't sleep? Read my countdown to voyaging blog @
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Valiente is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Southern Cross 31? db27513 Boat Review and Purchase Forum 35 09-24-2007 10:58 PM
Is one better than the other? gandydancer Gear & Maintenance 7 07-11-2002 06:08 PM
Small Boat Mast Stepping SailNet Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 06-12-2002 08:00 PM
Radar mast mounting positions? GS46 Gear & Maintenance 2 04-03-2002 08:59 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome