New engine intake thru-hull mounted wrong?!? - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 24 Old 05-18-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
FishFinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
New engine intake thru-hull mounted wrong?!?

My engine was overheating last year, the input strainer thru-hull was corroded and not letting much water in. So I had the boatyard replace said intake thru-hull today, used to be 1/2" scoop (clamshell) bronze, I upped it to 3/4" marelon (also scoop or clamshell). The OLD thru-hull was mounted with the slots facing BACKWARDS. I assumed the yard would install new 3/4" the same way, but of course they put it in with slots facing FORWARD this time. They're telling me this is how it's supposed to be, and there won't be any issues. Is this right?

I'm worried that with a bigger thru-hull that is now facing forward, the scoop will ram more water in than the 'ol volvo can handle (1980 MD7A 13hp by the way) possibly I dunno flooding the engine with saltwater or something ... ?? Dunno.

Oh and they drilled for the scoop holes & bedded it with 5200 so it's going to be a big deal to change.

1980 S2 9.2A (30') in Anacortes, WA
Aux power 13hp Volvo MD7A

Last edited by FishFinder; 05-18-2009 at 07:02 PM.
FishFinder is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 24 Old 05-18-2009
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
Given the speed your boat sails at, I seriously doubt that it will "ram" enough water into the through-hull to cause your engine problems. Yes, IIRC, this is pretty typical on slower boats.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 24 Old 05-18-2009
DrB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 966
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Maybe not a big deal

I haven't seen a lot of thru-hull strainers, but most that I have seen are pointed with the grate aft, but I have seen them like your new one is positioned also.

Having the grate in either direction is not the controlling factor in the amount of water that comes through the grate. Basically the weight of the boat pushing down on the water, the % of open area in the grate, and the size of the hole in the thru-hull dictates the flow of water through the hull.

The thing that controls the amount of water flow through the motor is the water pump, not the thru-hull size or it's orientation. The bigger the water pump and/or the faster it turns, the more flow through the motor. So as long as you are using a water pump that is properly sized for your motor, you should have no issues.

DrB

If you liked my advice/response, give me some rep points. If you didn't......well what do you expect, it was free.

Last edited by DrB; 05-18-2009 at 07:27 PM.
DrB is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 24 Old 05-18-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
FishFinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Ok thanks dawg and dr. Good to know it's not a big deal so I won't raise a big stink. Just wish the guy would have asked me before he switched the orientation.

1980 S2 9.2A (30') in Anacortes, WA
Aux power 13hp Volvo MD7A
FishFinder is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 24 Old 05-18-2009
Senior Member
 
JimsCAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 2,809
Thanks: 2
Thanked 70 Times in 65 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
MIne way originally pointed aft. When I changed it out a couple of years ago, I pointed it forward. Didn't seem to make any difference.
JimsCAL is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 24 Old 05-18-2009
Senior Member
 
Valiente's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11
   
Same here. I prefer the idea of it mounted aft, because things like plastic bags will slide off it easier when the engine's off.

But as I have had this happen exactly once in my sailing life, even I doubt the size of the test sample.

Can't sleep? Read my countdown to voyaging blog @
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Valiente is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 24 Old 05-18-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
FishFinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimsCAL View Post
MIne way originally pointed aft. When I changed it out a couple of years ago, I pointed it forward. Didn't seem to make any difference.
Very good to know.

Want to add that this is the first time I've had the boatyard work on my boat. Up until now I've done everything myself, and I was surprised how difficult it was for me to watch the work going on ... made me very nervous. Guess I care more about my boat than I realized. Paying $82/hr for the labor (and seeing 3 mechanics standing around looking at my thru-hull) wasn't helping either ...

1980 S2 9.2A (30') in Anacortes, WA
Aux power 13hp Volvo MD7A

Last edited by FishFinder; 05-18-2009 at 08:17 PM.
FishFinder is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 24 Old 05-18-2009
Sea Slacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
hehe.

FWIW I turned a strainer to face forward on purpose on my boat - this may make it slightly more succeptible to debris, but on the other hand it probably improves the water intake somewhat.
2 years later, over a 1000 miles of motoring - and no issues so far.
brak is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 24 Old 05-18-2009
Senior Member
 
Maine Sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maine Coast
Posts: 5,871
Thanks: 19
Thanked 217 Times in 165 Posts
Rep Power: 16
       
The reason for it

The reason it is intended to face aft on sailboats is so not to flood the engine by forcing water through the raw water intake. With a low enough anti-siphon loop and a good turn of speed down a wave it is entirely possible to "scoop" enough water to force it up over the anti-siphon and begin filling the wet exhaust.

I am very surprised your boat yard would 1) install it this way and 2) after messing up still insist it was correct..?

Hardly seems worth the $82.00 per hour.. Personally I am a non-believer in external grates and much prefer a 1" or larger intake that can be snaked from inside the boat if necessary..

______
-Maine Sail / CS-36T


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




© Images In Posts Property of Compass Marine Inc.


Maine Sail is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 24 Old 05-19-2009
Senior Member
 
patrickrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
The use of 5200 is probably the more disturbing part. They went for the easy way out. You may want to complain to the yard management about improper installation and improper materials being used. Maybe they'll cut you a deal, although it won't be anywhere near enough to cover the cost of repair when you need to remove the thru-hull and 5200.

Patrick Rea

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1978 30' Hughes Northstar 1000
1964 20' Bertram Moppie
patrickrea is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tips For Compound, Polish & Wax Maine Sail Gear & Maintenance 256 2 Weeks Ago 12:34 PM
Overheating HELP !!! Culinary411 Gear & Maintenance 19 08-07-2007 05:33 PM
High Tech vs traditional-Comments? Pangaea General Discussion (sailing related) 38 08-07-2007 01:07 AM
hull construction cgha33 Boat Review and Purchase Forum 4 05-23-2003 07:11 PM
Safety Check Mark Matthews Her Sailnet Articles 0 01-25-2000 07:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome