Help w/ proper name ... - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 Old 06-21-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,006
Thanks: 5
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
Help w/ proper name ...

I'm trying to figure out what this is called besides just "metal ring".



What I am looking for is something like that, but big, like four or five inches in diameter, that is cast and not welded (for strength) and can hold like 1000lbs of weight when secured with line. What would you call something like that, does it have a proper name ?

What are you pretending not to know ?

Please support my
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wind_magic is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: chesapeake bay
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
a properly welded ring will be stronger than a cast one
scottyt is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 14 Old 06-21-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,006
Thanks: 5
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyt View Post
a properly welded ring will be stronger than a cast one
Good to know, thanks.

So is it just called "welded metal ring" ?

What are you pretending not to know ?

Please support my
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wind_magic is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
Just curious, what are you planning on using it for. One that can support 1000 lbs. of weight safely is going to be relatively thick and heavy. If it is going to be supporting something overhead, you'd want a fairly significant safety factor in calculating the SWL.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 14 Old 06-21-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,006
Thanks: 5
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
Just curious, what are you planning on using it for. One that can support 1000 lbs. of weight safely is going to be relatively thick and heavy. If it is going to be supporting something overhead, you'd want a fairly significant safety factor in calculating the SWL.
Dog, what I want to do in the abstract is to have a load that has two rings on it, one on either side, and to lift that load with ropes on either end pulling horizontally so that the load is suspended in the air and is between two ropes as if it was suspended over a river with the ropes tied at either shore.

I'm starting to think that screw links like the ones that climbers use might be better able to hold a load instead of something round like a metal ring.


What are you pretending not to know ?

Please support my
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by wind_magic; 06-21-2009 at 08:26 PM.
wind_magic is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,477
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Rep Power: 12
 
Not sure but maybe what you describe is a "figure 8" they are available made from a variety of materials and sizes.
Figure 8's
capttb is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 221
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 14
 
It's just a stainless O ring. WM has them up to about 2 1/2 in. They are used regularly for rope bridles on hoist launched boats such as Lido 14s, CFJs, etc. Sorry but I don't know where you would get a bigger one. Also, as scottyt said, cast is not really stronger. Forged and welded would be my choice.
jgeissinger is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Owner, Green Bay Packers
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 13
       
Windy,
You'll find more strength in a shackle of some sort versus a ring, or steel grommet, if you will.

You should though be aware of some basic cargo gear factors before you attempt the suspension of such a heavy load.

If I understand your goal, it is to suspend a thousand pound weight by way of two lines, one to either side of the weight, and have the lines as nearly horizontal as possible. My first, and facetious, question is; have you ever seen a twelve inch mooring line (circ.)? (g) The non-facetious point is that, when suspending a load between two lines in such a manner one must be conversant with the stresses involved in the geometry of the two lines.

On board ship we'd call each of your lines a "fall". If we were suspending a load of 1000 lb between two falls where the angle between the falls was zero, both vertical, the strain on each fall would be 500 lbs. This is the lowest stress possible on each fall. As we separate the hauling part of each fall, and we'll assume that the fall angle for each is an equal distance off the vertical, the strain on the falls increases. At a fall angle of 90 degrees, each fall 45 degrees off from the vertical, the strain on each fall is 750 lbs. At a fall angle of 120 degrees, each fall 60 degrees off the vertical, the strain on each individual fall would be equal to the load suspended, 1000lbs. That 120 degree fall angle is regarded as the maximum safe working fall angle for cargo operations, btw. Anything after that is regarded as "tightlining", your objective, I believe. The danger in that is that at, say, a 150 degree fall angle, each fall 75 degrees off the vertical, the strain on each fall would be 1900lbs. Note though that the combined forces that you are subjecting the falls to, wherever to which the falls are attached is 3800lbs. As you approach a fall angle of 180 degrees, both falls at 90 degrees from the vertical, you reach a strain on each fall approaching infinity.

These problems can be solve either geometrically or trigonometrically but I lack the equipment to diagram it for you here. You might google the parallelogram method of strain analysis for more detailed information.

I think you'll now appreciate my facetious example. Btw, a 12" mooring line is a 4" diameter line and when constructed of nylon has a breaking strain of around 324,000lbs, and using a safety factor of 5, would give a working load of 64,800lbs. If it was to be contemplated that there might be shock loading, one would use a safety factor of 9, giving it a working load of 36,000lbs. At that fall angle of 150 degrees we'd be able to only support a load of 18,950lbs safely!

(by my quick calculations, to support a load of 1000lbs, you're going to need line with a breaking strength of 14,343lbs to suspend that load with a fall angle of 176 degrees, allowing no safety factor for working load. With a safety factor of 5, that's a line capable of 71,715lbs. 2" diameter nylon should do you.) I'd be looking for some 50 ton shackles and leave the climbing gear out! (g)

“Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it.”
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.
sailaway21 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
Solid welded links are probably stronger than screw links, if less convenient. I'd agree with Sway that holding a load up by two essentially horizontal lines is not a wise thing and quite dangerous. The forces involved are quite significant and unless you're really aware of them, you're going to get someone killed. His point about the loads being enormously magnified by the lines being so close to horizontal is one you have to pay attention to.

This is kind of why I was wondering what your purpose for the rings was.

Just for yucks and giggles, take some small stuff, say 1/8" rope and try lifting a 50 lb. weight so that the two cords are horizontal as you've indicated you want to do. I know a 1/8" rope will hold 50 lbs. pretty easily, since the stuff I use has a breaking load of almost 450 lbs. I bet the rope breaks before you can support the 50 lb. weight with the lines almost horizontal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind_magic View Post
Dog, what I want to do in the abstract is to have a load that has two rings on it, one on either side, and to lift that load with ropes on either end pulling horizontally so that the load is suspended in the air and is between two ropes as if it was suspended over a river with the ropes tied at either shore.

I'm starting to think that screw links like the ones that climbers use might be better able to hold a load instead of something round like a metal ring.


Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 14 Old 06-21-2009
Senior Member
 
patrickrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Back in my days of theatre rigging and flying large PA stacks, fabric or wire rope slings were good and quick links were never allowed because of they way they can loosen when vibrating. A shackle is the proper device as you can safety wire them.

Patrick Rea

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1978 30' Hughes Northstar 1000
1964 20' Bertram Moppie
patrickrea is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another proper course question langousta Racing 11 12-27-2005 05:33 AM
Rules - Luffing v Sailing above proper course Bootydawg Racing 2 09-09-2005 07:15 AM
yet more proper course questions dpboatnut Racing 7 09-29-2004 07:41 AM
Proper Course dmurcott Racing 6 06-14-2004 06:56 PM
Above Proper Course MemphisMud General Discussion (sailing related) 4 10-15-2002 09:43 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome