Long Range WiFi -- Posting right now using "long range" wireless - Page 3 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree1Likes
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 10-13-2010
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
At longer distance, the vertical beam angle is less of an issue. It is really only at shorter distances that it is a significant issue. The further you are from the WiFi hotspot, the more height the vertical beam angle will cover.
__________________
Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
  #22  
Old 10-13-2010
Bene505's Avatar
Glad I found Sailnet
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,548
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 7
Bene505 will become famous soon enough Bene505 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardhula View Post
Hmm I think that might be an issue with your machine. My Bullet is left on permanently at the moment. As soon as my laptop boots up or its brought out of sleep mode, it connects. This is true with direct LAN connection or with my present setup, Bullet->802.11n WLAN router->laptop WLAN adaptor.
In that case, you may have to power-up the Bullet after powering up the router. When I directly connect the laptop (via wires), I have to power up the Bullet last. The same thing may be happening with a direct connection to the router. Not sure. It is certainly no big deal though.

Regards,
Brad
__________________
Posts you might like:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Bene505; 01-16-2012 at 10:13 PM.
  #23  
Old 10-13-2010
DropTop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
DropTop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
At longer distance, the vertical beam angle is less of an issue. It is really only at shorter distances that it is a significant issue. The further you are from the WiFi hotspot, the more height the vertical beam angle will cover.
correct, but the closer you are the stronger the signal will be, and the more signal reflection you will have, so you will still have a useable signal, even if each side's antenna is not in the focused part of the beam. Plus the beam widths are not hard edges, look at a antenna RF radiation patterns in the specs and you will see that there are significant amounts of RF energy being pumped out in other directions beyond the advertised beamwidth. look at page 2 of the PDF linked below for an example.

http://www.streakwave.com/mmSWAVE1/Video/Pawod24-v2.pdf
__________________
Four Points - 1990 Hunter 27'

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #24  
Old 10-13-2010
Bene505's Avatar
Glad I found Sailnet
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,548
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 7
Bene505 will become famous soon enough Bene505 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
At longer distance, the vertical beam angle is less of an issue. It is really only at shorter distances that it is a significant issue. The further you are from the WiFi hotspot, the more height the vertical beam angle will cover.
That's true if your antenna is at a different height that the shore-side antenna. If there are surrounding cliffs, for instance with houses on top.

That's less true is you are purely concerned about pitching* at anchor. Then extra beamwidth will really help you. I find that our boat doesn't pitch that much usually. (50' boat, 10 foot water depth, 3 miles of fetch, monohull.) But the 30 foot boats around us have pitched up and down 20 degrees from horizontal in a blow. (Remember Mainsails videos of anchorages up there?) That's not the normal conditions at the anchorage, but it is a time when you would want connectivity to see where the storm is going.

As another thought on this, the TCP/IP protocols have some provision for lost packets, IIRC, so if you have the occasional extra pitch, you may still have service -- it simply retransmits that part of the packet that was lost.

Boats usally don't rock (actually roll) at a mooring/anchor as much as they simply pitch with the approching wind swell. That is, unless you are exposed to swells at your anchorage, in which case you may actually need a big verticle beamwidth to accomodate more intense rolling.

I believe that for 95% of what I need, a high-gain, omni-directional antenna works best. 12 db is great. I'd go even higher (and narrower beamwidth) if I could.

Regards,
Brad
__________________
Posts you might like:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #25  
Old 10-13-2010
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bene505 View Post
That's true if your antenna is at a different height that the shore-side antenna. If there are surrounding cliffs, for instance with houses on top.

That's less true is you are purely concerned about pitching* at anchor. Then extra beamwidth will really help you. I find that our boat doesn't pitch that much usually. (50' boat, 10 foot water depth, 3 miles of fetch, monohull.) But the 30 foot boats around us have pitched up and down 20 degrees from horizontal in a blow. (Remember Mainsails videos of anchorages up there?) That's not the normal conditions at the anchorage, but it is a time when you would want connectivity to see where the storm is going.

As another thought on this, the TCP/IP protocols have some provision for lost packets, IIRC, so if you have the occasional extra pitch, you may still have service -- it simply retransmits that part of the packet that was lost.
Only for TCP connections, not UDP ones.

Quote:
Boats usally don't rock (actually roll) at a mooring/anchor as much as they simply pitch with the approching wind swell. That is, unless you are exposed to swells at your anchorage, in which case you may actually need a big verticle beamwidth to accomodate more intense rolling.

I believe that for 95% of what I need, a high-gain, omni-directional antenna works best. 12 db is great. I'd go even higher (and narrower beamwidth) if I could.

Regards,
Brad

This is why I generally recommend a NS2 type device rather than a Bullet with Omni setup for most monohulls.
__________________
Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
  #26  
Old 10-13-2010
DropTop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
DropTop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
Only for TCP connections, not UDP ones.
true, but the transmitting radio will retransmit frames that don't get ack'd by the receiving side regardless of what transport protocol is being used (it happens at layer 2, TCP/UDP packets start at layer 3). The number of retransmits varies based on the vendor, but a typical value is 4 retransmits before the frame is dropped.

this means that even UDP packets that are dropped on the wifi link will be retransmitted (at least a few times), just with a little delay.
__________________
Four Points - 1990 Hunter 27'

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #27  
Old 10-13-2010
Bene505's Avatar
Glad I found Sailnet
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,548
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 7
Bene505 will become famous soon enough Bene505 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
...This is why I generally recommend a NS2 type device rather than a Bullet with Omni setup for most monohulls.
Don't multihulls rock more in a swell?

Besides that, is the NS2s omnidirectional? You definitly want omnidirectional, unless you are the type of person that aims your solar stick every couple hours. Or if you want really really really long range on windless days and don't mind periodic aiming.

Regards,
Brad
__________________
Posts you might like:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
. .
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Bene505; 10-13-2010 at 06:11 PM.
  #28  
Old 10-13-2010
richardhula's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
richardhula is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bene505 View Post
Besides that, is the NS2s omnidirectional? You definitly want omnidirectional,
Regards,
Brad
NS2's have dual polarization 10-11 dB gain antenna with about 55° beam width horizontal & vertical, so probably better than bullet/omni IF pointing roughly in the right direction.

They just don't look right on a boat though
__________________
Richard

There's no place like 127.0.0.1
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #29  
Old 10-13-2010
hardin45lover
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: florida mostly
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
hardin45lover is on a distinguished road
Sounds like all of these work better then my crappy SKYMATE and the wont even return mails or calls BEWARE!
  #30  
Old 10-13-2010
sailingdog's Avatar
Telstar 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 13
sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice sailingdog is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bene505 View Post
Don't multihulls rock more in a swell?
Generally, no. Unlike monohulls, the extreme beam and initial stability of the multihull generally limits rocking to a fairly small motion. I've been in anchorages where the incoming swell made it very uncomfortable for monohulls, to the point where some would weigh anchor and leave for another anchorage. If the swell is just at the right frequency, you can get a monohull to really roll a lot, if the swell and the boat are at the boat's resonant frequency.

Quote:
Besides that, is the NS2s omnidirectional? You definitly want omnidirectional, unless you are the type of person that aims your solar stick every couple hours. Or if you want really really really long range on windless days and don't mind periodic aiming.

Regards,
Brad
The fact that the NS2 covers about 60˚ of horizontal angle means that unless the wind or current really shifts, there is not a lot of need to re-point an NS2.
__________________
Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK & Netherlands. Tacktick to launch Wireless Maxi range for large ... - BYM News (press release) NewsReader News Feeds 0 11-02-2006 05:15 AM
Light Lists, Lighthouses, and Visible Ranges Jim Sexton Seamanship Articles 0 06-19-2003 08:00 PM
Light Lists, Lighthouses, and Visible Ranges Jim Sexton Her Sailnet Articles 0 06-19-2003 08:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.