
03-17-2010
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
Actually, there's no reason you couldn't run them both off a single battery bank. That would be better than having two separate battery banks, because of the Peukert factor and such.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bljones
There is no advantage and probably no real cost savings.
I'm sure one or two of the "silent runnings" types will come along and clarify my numbers, but here's my thinking: Theoretically, you would get twice the thrust, but you need two banks of batteries, so twice the weight, and nearly twice the consumption as running a single motor with higher thrust. Over the long term you will have to replace twice as many batteries, and have twice as many moving parts to maintain, which is why there is likely no long term cost savings over a single motor.
The only real advantage is that you could improve your tight quarters maneuvering.
|
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|