- Quick Menu
-
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Wish I never found SN!
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Moreton Bay
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 6
|
|
|
Wind Generator placement ???
I have my radar mounted at the back of the boat on a pole that is also my o/b motor crane. what I would like to do is mount the wind generator over the radar dome, rather than put a second pole on the port side. Would this cause any problems to the radar, the cable is shielded
[IMG]  [/IMG]
__________________
Simon
Ericson 39B. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I love my boat
S/V GOODONYA
Brisbane
present location Brisbane Queensland
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DELIVERY SKIPPER
Last edited by SimonV; 10-15-2010 at 07:39 AM.
Reason: add photo
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Glad I found Sailnet
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,660
Rep Power: 5
|
|
|
Wind generators create a lot of vibration, not sure I'd want one shaking my radar.
Also, that seems to be really high up. It's going to add a lot of heeling when you're out sailing.
But what do I know, I'm still installing our wind generator.
Regards,
Brad
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Wandering Aimlessly
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cruising
Posts: 14,607
Rep Power: 12
|
|
|
Like Brad, I would be concerned about the vibration. Placing the wind gen on the other side would add symmetry, visually and physically.
__________________
John
Ontario 32 - Aria
Free, is the heart, that lives not, in fear.
Full, is the spirit, that thinks not, of falling.
True, is the soul, that hesitates not, to give.
Alive, is the one, that believes, in love. JCP
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. - Website & Blog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Wish I never found SN!
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Moreton Bay
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 6
|
|
|
Hey Brad, the generator weighs 13lbs and I guess 4lbs for the extra s/s short pole to put it over the radar. Also it may impact on the movement of the wind vane.
__________________
Simon
Ericson 39B. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I love my boat
S/V GOODONYA
Brisbane
present location Brisbane Queensland
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DELIVERY SKIPPER
Last edited by SimonV; 10-15-2010 at 08:30 AM.
Reason: weight
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
|
Aside from the vibration issue, which isn't good for the radome, how tall is the pole that you'd be mounting the wind gen on and how would you attach it to the radar pole. I can't see of any way of securing a second post that above the radome that wouldn't interfere with the radome's operation, since it appears the radome is mounted atop the existing pole, rather than on a bracket attached to the side of the existing pole.
What might make more sense, is replacing the existing pole with a taller one and then mounting the wind gen on top of it, and mounting the radome on a mast-mount on the forward side of the pole, low enough that it is clear of the blades.
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Wish I never found SN!
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Moreton Bay
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 6
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog
Aside from the vibration issue, which isn't good for the radome, how tall is the pole that you'd be mounting the wind gen on and how would you attach it to the radar pole. I can't see of any way of securing a second post that above the radome that wouldn't interfere with the radome's operation, since it appears the radome is mounted atop the existing pole, rather than on a bracket attached to the side of the existing pole.
What might make more sense, is replacing the existing pole with a taller one and then mounting the wind gen on top of it, and mounting the radome on a mast-mount on the forward side of the pole, low enough that it is clear of the blades.
|
Hi Dan, that is what I would like to do but leaving the radar where it is and having a new section of 3' x 2" S/S tube welded to the existing pole and bent like a J .
__________________
Simon
Ericson 39B. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I love my boat
S/V GOODONYA
Brisbane
present location Brisbane Queensland
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DELIVERY SKIPPER
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
|
I think going with a single piece pole would be better. Welds are more likely to fail due to corrosion issues than a single piece pole would be.
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Glad I found Sailnet
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,660
Rep Power: 5
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonV
Hey Brad, the generator weighs 13lbs and I guess 4lbs for the extra s/s short pole to put it over the radar. Also it may impact on the movement of the wind vane.
|
It's not the weight, it's the wind area. When spinning, the blades have the wind resistance of the entire swept area of the blades. So if it has a 3.5 foot blade radius ([edit] 7 foot diameter), the wind resistance would be the same as a sheet of plywood. That's a lot to have 17 feet above the water. Even without the vibration and the welds that Dan mentions, it makes more sense to use a separate (and shorter) pole.
If you do use a separate & shorter pole, it will likely interfere with the vane on a narrow wind angle. This may be a good case for one of those annoying, noisy-but small wind generators mounted at just the right height.
Maybe it makes sense to back-up a bit on your requirements. Are you looking for charging mostly at anchor or while underway? Have you thought about putting solar atop your bimini? And there are more basic things like making an energy budget.
Regards,
Brad
Last edited by Bene505; 10-15-2010 at 01:06 PM.
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Telstar 28
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,315
Rep Power: 11
|
|
Brad—
a 3.5' radius is a 7' diameter..  A 6' diameter windgen has 28.27 sq. ft of effective surface area, a 7' diameter windgen has 38.48 sq. ft. of effective surface area.
Keeping the windgen high enough so the blades are not a hazard to the captain and crew is a very good idea. You can get chopped up pretty badly in higher winds by the blades.
__________________
Sailingdog
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Telstar 28
New England
You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)
If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..
Still—DON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
|

10-15-2010
|
 |
Glad I found Sailnet
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,660
Rep Power: 5
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog
Brad—
a 3.5' radius is a 7' diameter..  A 6' diameter windgen has 28.27 sq. ft of effective surface area, a 7' diameter windgen has 38.48 sq. ft. of effective surface area.
Keeping the windgen high enough so the blades are not a hazard to the captain and crew is a very good idea. You can get chopped up pretty badly in higher winds by the blades.
|
Yes, make that 7 foot diameter. And "almost as big as a sheet of plywood".
I'm not advocating anything lower than what you can reach up to, to tie off the blades.
Regards,
Brad
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.
|