Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanGSYS
Yes, integrating with an existing screen may be less costly, but if you ask the pilots among us, I'll bet they will tell you that redundancy is best, and a stand alone unit has its merits. But this defies the marketing efforts of the electronics producers.
New hi def radar is pretty cool with great resolution, low radiation output, short warm up time and low power consumption.
|
If you choose not to listen to the siren call of (high $$) networked electronics...
in our little YC there are mainly all Raymarine domes and Furuno gear. I would guess that Furuno is actually ahead by a few domes, for those keeping score.
I would like someday to have a fancy network system, but I do like the having the charting and radar separate. Of course my elderly opinion probably does not count since I still carry paper charts on board as well!
Local marine electronics dealer sez they will gladly sell me whatever I really insist on wanting... but if pressed they still believe that the "digital" radar needs to be available and in use for a while longer. (Sort of like the old adage to never buy version 1.0 of anything.)
I have done multiple deliveries with Furuno radar, mainly the 1623 and 1715 (for the record, I own a 1715) and one trip this fall with a slightly older Furuno small CRT radar. Their displays are "razor sharp" in fog and dark... and on one of the trips this year we had total blind navigation into a tight entry surrounded by rocks. It was truly an "instrument landing." (Neah Bay, WA, for those with a chart app on their computer.)
We were using a color plotter beside the Furuno and the combo was wonderful! One digitally tells you where the buoys and stuff
should be... and the other tells you what's
really out there.
What the Hay -- Rest assured, you can and will justify whatever system/gear you buy. After all, we all do that!
Fair winds to you, and NO fog!
LB