Pearson Mast Step - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest Forums > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 
  #1  
Old 05-10-2003
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 14
aphil138 is on a distinguished road
Pearson Mast Step

I need to remove 3 inches from the bottom of my mast because of corrosion.
The step looks ok, but need to be built up by the 3 inches I am taking off.
The question is.... what would be a suitable material to use under the step. This is a Pearson 424. I am thinking, 3 pieces of 1 inch Laminated marine Plywood coated in WEST System Epoxy. The step does not sit in Bilge water.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 05-13-2003
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,192
Thanks: 50
Thanked 37 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 14
knothead has a spectacular aura about knothead has a spectacular aura about knothead has a spectacular aura about
Pearson Mast Step

I''ve had to face this problem a few times and found that the simplest solution was to have the step modified or a new one built that made up for the bad material cut off the mast. A good machine shop should have no problem with this and it may be easier and longer lasting than the plywood.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 05-14-2003
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
mrputzo is on a distinguished road
Pearson Mast Step

I have done the exact same project on my Pearson 323. I used the existing metal mast step but build a new 3 inch solid fiberglass block using fiberglass roving and matte in a mold that I made to make up the 3 inches I cut off the end of the mast. I than fiberglassed the new block into the bilge. I used new silicone bronze lag bolts 3 inches longer than the originals and bolted the metal step into the new block. It looks like it was made that way when the boat was new. And no more mast setting in the water.

Good Luck
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 05-24-2003
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Strikeshield is on a distinguished road
Pearson Mast Step

I have been reading the thread on lightning protection with great interest and am amazed at the amount of misconceptions about the whole thing. Especially the information on lightning "prevention" systems or static dissipaters.
I think that it is safe to say that the information is wide ranging and confusing.
A few things are sure however, and need to be reiterated for the benefit of people wondering.
First of all there is no such thing as attracting a strike. Some individuals think that because they have the tallest mast in a marina that they are more susceptible to a strike or that installing a ground to the mast will increase the likelyhood of a strike. That is simply not true.
Secondly, there is no such thing as preventing a strike. Static dissipaters have been scientificially questioned by the IEEE and there are several papers written by scientific authorities documenting this. Two that are worth reading are:

http://www.strikeshield.com/Lightning%20info/mousaIEEEDissipators.pdf
This first paper was written as a result of a comprehensive study done for British Columbia Hydro on the effectiveness of static dissipaters. Dr. Moussa relied heavily on US data from NASA, the FAA and other scientific authorities.
and
http://www.thomson.ece.ufl.edu/lightning/IEEE.pdf
This paper written by the eminent Dr. Ewan Thomson of the university of Florida basically criticized the ABYC for recommending "seriously inadequate" measures for lightning protection.

All of the lightning authorities agree that there is only one solution to this problem and that is to properly ground ANY structure that is susceptible to a lightning strike and this includes boats. The problem for sailors is that most boat manufacturers DO NOT abide by the ABYC standards which recommend the installation of properly sized conductors to ground lightning energy from the mast to the water.
What are we left with ? Unprotected boats, improperly jury-rigged grounding devices such as chains and booster cables and complete confusion as to what to do.

A few important areas require attention of one is to create a lightning protection system;
Material selection and assembly procedures are quintessential to the success of such systems.
I shudder when I hear of people clamping booster cables to the stays of their sailboats. This is so dangerous !
The cable connectors are improperly sized and offer little contact surface. The result is an exploding vaporized copper clamp.
Using chains wrapped around masts is equally dangerous. The links are highly resistive and can overheat and melt the roof or set it on fire.
This has happened time and time again and yet people still believe that this is an acceptable solution. It is not.

Conductors must be properly sized. Nothing less than a 1/0 multi-stranded tinned copper marine shipboard cable should be used.
Wires must be connected using proper lugs that should be swaged onto the wire with an industrial hydraulic press. The connections should be tinned and then protected with a heat shrink. These methodologies and assembly techniques are used in the power industry. There are UL, ISO, ASTM and IEEE standards with respect to the use of cables for conducting power and they are the result of extensive testing and experience.These methods are the only acceptable methods of building such a system. Hardware store household No.4 wire saddle clamps are inadequate for marine applications.
Electrical connection to the mast must be made through a large contact area. Small clamps and screws or bolts are inadequate for sustaining multiple strikes. Copper parts and components should be tinned for corrosion resistance and to prevent galvanic reactions.
All parts used in the creation of such a system MUST be copper. Not Monel, Not Bronze, Not Stainless Steel or any other less conductive metal. Choosing materials other than copper only adds resistivity to the ground circuit which will cause this material to overheat. This principle is used in electric stoves. Steel wires with high current running through them turn red hot. Same thing will happen to these resistive metals if lightning energy comes through them.
Bonding Bronze Throughulls to the lightning ground is another good method of ensuring the boat sinks in the event of a strike. If the throughulls have lightning energy running through them, the current passing through will heat them up to the point where they may melt the surrounding fiberglass and pop out. Then you will have much more serious problems.
Finally the dissipation electrode in contact with water must be copper (tinned) and offer a large amount of edges as electrical energy will contact with water much more freely through edges than flat areas.

Chris L.
Strikeshield
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 05-29-2003
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
CaptnChrisS is on a distinguished road
Pearson Mast Step

I had the same problem on my Pearson 365. The spar guys who added PVC to my inner mast cut a very dense form of plastic from their shop and put in place. I don''t know what the material was, but a spar shop should know about it (I used Styx and Rigging in Kemah, TX). The old mast step was able to sit above plastic block. Had to purchase longer SS bolts, but most options I think you''ll need to do this anyways.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deck stepped Mast-Always Bad ? Mrs Mutiny Boat Review and Purchase Forum 24 10-05-2009 07:55 PM
which 38ft boat? bluewaterdreamer Boat Review and Purchase Forum 10 10-03-2007 12:54 PM
30ft Catalina BigRuss Boat Review and Purchase Forum 3 09-09-2006 05:33 PM
what mast? jrwright Boat Review and Purchase Forum 3 03-14-2004 08:19 PM
Is one better than the other? gandydancer Gear & Maintenance 7 07-11-2002 06:08 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012