7/8 Fractional Rig - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  

Quick Menu
Boat Reviews  
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Marine Electronics
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here

Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 
Old 03-19-2011
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 5
micheck is on a distinguished road
7/8 Fractional Rig

What are the advantages and rule workarounds that come from a 7/8 fractional rig? If a 3/4 temporary forestay (storm sail or stasail) requires a running backstay, why doesn't a 7/8 stay require/use one?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Old 03-19-2011
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 841
Thanks: 8
Thanked 63 Times in 58 Posts
Rep Power: 9
knuterikt is on a distinguished road
With a 7/8 fractional rig the forestay load will be 1/8 down from the masthed and the aft stay fixing point.
At this distance from the top (and less) the mast is considered to be so stiff that the forward force induced by the head stay will be transfered to the back stay.

The same reasoning applies for a solent stay on a masthed rigged boat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Old 03-19-2011
paulk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CT/ Long Island Sound
Posts: 2,601
Thanks: 4
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Rep Power: 15
paulk is on a distinguished road
Rigs are all different, as are the masts they hold up. If you rig an inner forestay temporarily (for a storm sail, for example) on a masthead rig, the stresses involved may call for a backstay to counter the forward pull that might wrack the mast out of true. If the stick was stronger, maybe a backstay wouldn't be needed - but it would likely then be heavier, which might mean more rolling in rough weather - just when you'd want to be smoothing things down aboard by putting up a storm jib. A 7/8 rig might not require running backs for a variety of reasons. Maybe the mast extrusion is hefty enough, as just said, not to need them. Maybe there are jumper struts to stiffen the mast and spread the load at the top and thus make the permananent backstay sufficient. We have running backs that we consider using when the wind picks up over about 25, but we don't need them all the time because the section and jumpers keep the mast stiff enough in lighter winds. Everything's a matter of balance. We like the fractional rig because it provides a bit more sail shape control for the main, makes changing jibs easier because they're smaller, and enables us to reduce or increase sail quickly by reefing or unreefing the main without having to get out to the foredeck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Old 03-19-2011
Faster's Avatar
Just another Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 16,295
Thanks: 100
Thanked 301 Times in 291 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about
Many 7/8th rigs do use running backstays and/or checkstays. Jeff H can weigh in on the many advantages (from a sail trim/shape perspective) that a fractional rig offers - in fact do a search and you'll find many excellent articles on the topic already here. As Paul mentions, smaller more manageable headsails and spinnakers is another 'advantage'.

Whether or not a frac rig uses runners is really a combination: of the intended purpose of the boat (ie racing vs cruising), the flexibility and structural properties of the mast section used, the arrangement of the spreaders and shrouds (ie swept vs in-line) and the interest of the owner in pulling "extra strings".

Many of the current crop of production fracs use varying degrees of spreader sweep angles to aid in supporting the mast section and prebend - and provide some forestay tension without runners. Hunter is most extreme here, with severely swept spreaders and the B&R diamond stay pattern. Beneteau and others are using more moderate sweep angles.

A stiff enough, strong enough mast section will not need runners for structural integrity, but performance will benefit by using runners to tension the forestay. With a bendy top section above the hounds cranking on the backstay will induce mast bend without necessarily adding to forestay tension. Here is where runners serve a good purpose, directly applying forestay tension, and contributing to the precise shape of mast bend in combination with the backstay.

When cruising, however, runners need to be handled on each tack, and while gybing they can really be problematic if the end up getting snagged on the wrong side of the sail. Our boat, a 3/4 frac with a relatively robust section, is rigged for runners. We have chosen not to use them at the obvious cost of pointing ability, but the advantage of simplicity.

Production boats today are built to simplify sailing (eg.. roller mains - which don't really like mast bend much) and so most of their rigs are designed to function without runners... that doesn't mean they wouldn't benefit performance-wise from adding them.

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)

Last edited by Faster; 03-19-2011 at 02:33 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fractional Rig overbored General Discussion (sailing related) 1 10-08-2010 01:56 PM
Fractional Rigs, Again! wrevans Boat Review and Purchase Forum 6 04-27-2006 07:30 PM
Fractional Rigs MastAbeam Boat Review and Purchase Forum 1 06-29-2005 05:35 AM
fractional rig vessels johngov. Boat Review and Purchase Forum 1 12-08-2004 02:30 PM
masthead v. fractional rig aasault Boat Review and Purchase Forum 1 10-05-2001 03:31 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.