CPT or integrated with CP - SailNet Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 Old 03-27-2011 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SanDiegoChip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Puerto Vallarta Mexico
Posts: 402
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
CPT or integrated with CP

Hi,
We are trying to decide on a autopilot. We have an Islander Freeport 36 sail boat. It weighs in unloaded at 17,000 so a normal wheel pilot will not work.
So the two options we see are the CPT wheel pilot or under the cockpit sole autopilot.
One is quite a bit more expensive than the other.

We will be living aboard and cursing Central America the Pacific coast.

We would like to install one this summer. We have not yet installed our electronics so we are open to say a Garmin under cockpit wheel pilot that integrates into thee chart plotter.

Now the question, do you actually use the autopilot integrated into the chart plotter?

I have heard that south of the US the chart plotter is not very accurate so say Charley charts.

If you do not use them then why would we go to the expense?
People who cross oceans use win vanes and they are not connected to the chart plotter.

Of course we will not be crossing oceans.

So if we would use the autopilot that is connected to the chart plotter functionality then we would consider it worth it. If not then the CPT Autopilot would probably be our choice.

So any words of wisdom here please?
Thank you,
Chip
SanDiegoChip is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 2 Old 03-27-2011
Senior Member
 
fallard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mystic
Posts: 981
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
I switched from a wheel pilot to a below deck autopilot about 10 years ago and couldn't be happier. The old Autohelm (Raymarine ancestor) was very unreliable on my 13,000# 35 footer. Our below deck Raymarine (formerly Raytheon) autopilot uses an electrical drive unit and is coupled to my chartplotter.

I just replaced all of my electronics (due to a lightning strike) in 2010 with Raymarine gear because the Raytheon stuff worked well and was ultra-reliable.

With just 2 of us, the autopilot has become a third crew member, making the longer trips more relaxing for us. Because it is integrated with the chartplotter, it accommodates set and drift and adjusts the boat's heading to stay on the rhumb line to a waypoint.

By the way, we can enter waypoints directly from the chartplotter instead of picking them off a paper chart and using a calculator to figure out decimal minutes. The 2010 chartplotter allows us to control the autopilot directly, so there is no confusion in setting a waypoint.

Regarding the accuracy of charts, we just returned from the Virgin Islands and carried a portable Garmin chartplotter with the current Eastern Caribbean chart chip. It was rather impressive for its accuracy in reef areas--where it really matters--at least where we were able to verify.

That said, the chartplotters use mapping data from a third party that obtains data from sources that may not be up-to-date. In many cases the mapping data is derived from paper charts that were published before GPS-based mapping was available, so you need to stay alert in unfamiliar waters.

We have also seen mapping errors in local waters that showed up on both Raytheon and Garmin charts, which obviously used the same source for mapping data. BTW, that particular problem was fixed a long time ago. The message here is that the accuracy of electronic charts is probably the same, no matter whose chartplotter you buy. If you buy a chartplotter that uses chips, make sure you have the latest chips. (You should also have recent paper charts, as a hedge on electronic failure.)

Bottom line: We consider an autopilot integrated with a chartplotter to be indispensable for shorthanded cruising. It is a safety feature should one of us be injured underway. Primarily, it is a great convenience that makes for a more relaxing cruise. The helmsperson can eat a sandwich with both hands, for example, and can concentrate on watch duties while the autopilot manages set and drift (if it is coupled to a chartplotter) and otherwise handles the tedium of maintaining your course.
fallard is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outboard engine w/integrated fuel tank? AboardIndigo Gear & Maintenance 8 12-25-2007 09:32 AM
Integrated toe rail chocks Holeinthewater Gear & Maintenance 5 05-26-2006 11:52 AM
Integrated Radar/GPS/Plotter flicker Gear & Maintenance 1 10-05-2003 07:48 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome