Babystay lifting Coach Top! - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-07-2012
L124C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
L124C is on a distinguished road
Babystay lifting Coach Top!

The Babystay on my Yankee 30 is lifting the deck (Coach top) off a bulkhead about a quarter inch. I'm pointing at the area that lifts, though, I've relieved the tension on the stay. Three of the four acorn nuts on the bottom of the stay are on the right. I'm wondering what they did with the fourth (I'm pointing at it in the topside picture). Is it a screw (not a through bolt) that they ran into the top of the bulkhead? If so, that seems worthless. I assume the screws on the left (first picture) were supposed to join the bulkhead and Coach Top. To my surprise, they must be screws, as they are not through bolts. In any case, they apparently are not doing their job anymore. The babystay runs at a steep angle, so though it doesn't have a lot of load on it, the force it exerts on the Coach Top is mainly lift. I'm thinking that I may need to connect the three bolts (bottom of stay) to a fitting that would straddle and be through bolted to the edge of the bulkhead, about a foot under the Coach top. Thoughts?
Attached Thumbnails
Babystay lifting Coach Top!-0206121511.jpg   Babystay lifting Coach Top!-0206121512.jpg  

Last edited by L124C; 02-07-2012 at 09:36 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 02-07-2012
St Anna's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern QLD, Bayside
Posts: 1,428
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 12
St Anna is on a distinguished road
Sounds a very wise choice.

I have had similar dramas and havent yet come up with an answer as I dont have a bulkhead under the inner forestay.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 02-07-2012
AllThumbs's Avatar
midlife crisis member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 972
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 7
AllThumbs is on a distinguished road
Undo the acornless bolt and find out how it's fastened.
__________________
I sail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 02-07-2012
ASA and PSIA Instructor
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,496
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 15
sailingfool will become famous soon enough
Do you need the load on the babystay that produces this strain? I thought most folks who dont just remove the babystay completely, left their unconnected unless they were beating in a seaway, then attaching the babystay to prevent pumping...
__________________
Certified...in several regards...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 02-07-2012
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 33
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Sunday Driver is on a distinguished road
mabe make a stainless plate , to connect the deck to the bulkhead ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 02-07-2012
L124C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
L124C is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunday Driver View Post
maybe make a stainless plate , to connect the deck to the bulkhead ?
Thats what I was thinking. Maybe a U channel that would slip over the front edge of the bulkhead, with through bolts. It could be connected to the upper bolts by threaded rod or wire. Maybe I could simply extend the upper bolts to run into a fitting on top of the U channel. That would certainly hold it. Of course, then the question becomes - How well is the bottom of the bulkhead fastened? It would create potential for a major headache getting in or out of the V berth, but I'll bet you would only hit it once!

Last edited by L124C; 02-07-2012 at 09:09 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 02-07-2012
L124C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
L124C is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfool View Post
Do you need the load on the babystay that produces this strain? I thought most folks who dont just remove the babystay completely, left their unconnected unless they were beating in a seaway, then attaching the babystay to prevent pumping...
Hmmm, good point. When I tuned the rig, it factored into the mast bend, but I've heard your theory as well. Maybe I'll just leave it slack and see if I notice any difference. Certainly the easiest option!
I'm surprised that it is happening, as in general, the boat is built like a Brick you know what. On the other hand, she is over 40 years old! I'm not clear on what the screws on the left were doing. I would have expected through bolts, but then, I don't know much about boat building!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 02-07-2012
L124C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
L124C is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllThumbs View Post
Undo the acornless bolt and find out how it's fastened.
I don't dare. If it is in fact a through bolt and was installed before the bulkhead, I'll have to remove the bulkhead to get the nut on again. If it's a screw and was installed into the top of the bulkhead (unlikely, the more I look at the picture), I would expect it to be loose, as it is obviously not screwed tightly into the bulkhead anymore. In any case the lower stay fitting is secure and is fortunately not an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 02-07-2012
GeorgeB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alameda, San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,609
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 41 Posts
Rep Power: 10
GeorgeB is on a distinguished road
L124C – Is that baby stay original to the boat? Is the boat a tall rig and the stay installed to prevent mast pumping? I have seen where even reputable builders have put in a blind screw (but I wouldn’t recommend it.) You really need to tie off into something more substantial than the edge of a partial bulkhead. The load will still be concentrated on the center of the coach roof and not completely distributed along the roof under that bulkhead. Usually when stays are chain plated to a bulkhead it is done so the bulkhead can distribute the load across a wide area. Is it possible to tie into a cross member under the cabin sole with a cable? Check the moisture in your cabin roof. There is rust on one of the acorns which indicates a leak. What you might have is water intrusion into the plywood, weakening or rotting it which is causing the coach roof to deflect which would mean an entirely different kettle of fish. I vote for taking the pad eye off, inspect and rebed then work your engineering. Besides, those washers look a little small to be providing sufficient backing for such a massive pad eye.
L124C and mitiempo like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 02-13-2012
L124C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 48
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 8
L124C is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfool View Post
Do you need the load on the babystay that produces this strain? I thought most folks who dont just remove the babystay completely, left their unconnected unless they were beating in a seaway, then attaching the babystay to prevent pumping...
In his Practical Sailor article "Tunning the Masthead Rig" J. Pazereskis says:

"The problem with a statically straight mast is that when loaded it is too easy for the mast to invert, or bend backwards. This can happen when the boat is beating in a seaway or reaching with the spinnaker pole up. Most mast sections can accommodate a significant amount of forward bend without failure, but very little aft bend......In contrast, if you set up the rig so that it has "prebend", that is, the center of the mast bends forward when in a static condition, the loaded mast will flex in the proper direction. What flex there is will then tend to flatten the main, rather than bagging it, and the boat will balance better, particularly in heavy air, when most boats start to develop helm problems."
http://www.practical-sailor.com/mari...ig-7055-1.html

So...it sounds like a loaded Babystay is important, especially in SF where we see more than our share of "heavy air". Darn! It would have been so much easier to leave it unloaded and ignore the issue!

Last edited by L124C; 02-13-2012 at 06:26 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lifting points on a C&C Kiltmadoc C & C 4 09-17-2010 11:59 PM
Really a need for the Babystay? SCoffshore Dufour 1 12-09-2008 03:51 PM
Can I remove the babystay and the engine? hkg4237 Gear & Maintenance 4 09-17-2007 08:39 PM
Sailing without a BabyStay tlscott Gear & Maintenance 4 09-25-2006 01:21 PM
Lifting keels rbh1515 Boat Review and Purchase Forum 6 02-03-2004 09:28 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.