Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest Forums > Gear & Maintenance
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree28Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-21-2012
Cruisingdad's Avatar
Best Looking MALE Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mobile Liveaboards
Posts: 9,894
Thanks: 3
Thanked 94 Times in 49 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Cruisingdad is a jewel in the rough Cruisingdad is a jewel in the rough Cruisingdad is a jewel in the rough
Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

I took a tour of the Catalina facility last week. Really enjoyed meeting the folks and was shocked at the systems they have in place there. For those that have not see it (catalina lover or not), it is interesting - especially when compared to something like Valiant which only put out 8-12 boats/year.

Anyways, Catalina has moved away from the dripless shaft seals. My previous boats (320 and 380) had a traditional stuffing box but my C400 has a dripless. all the new vessels out of Catalina are back to a traditional stuffing box.

I inquired with them about this and they responded that effectively they changed because a stuffing box gives some warnings before going out and is not necessarily a big deal when it does. However, the dripless may fail with little notice and can become a, "water hose" down below.

I thought about that, and I tend to agree with them. I saw another Catalina 400 when I had my boat pulled and the yard owner told me the 400 had an emergency pull becuase their dripless failed and threatened the boat.

On the flip side, keeping a dry boat sure has its advantages too. Sure makes tracking down any potential leaks easier.

I am curious what others think about this? Opinions?

Brian
__________________
Sailnet Adminstrator & Moderator
Catalina 400 Technical Editor

2004 Catalina 400, Sea Mist IV (our boat, F/T Mobile Live Aboards in S FL and Keys primarily)
1987 Tayana Vancouver 42, Credendo Vides, (Mom and Pops boat, F/T Mobile Live Aboards in Puget Sound)

My Website:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Follow My Blog at:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Follow me on Facebook:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 08-21-2012
tommays's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,037
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Rep Power: 6
tommays will become famous soon enough
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

I use the wonder packing and it gets wet BUT it does not really drip faster than it can evaporate from all the motor heat

BUT even a small drip would go to the small deep part of my bilge that has a big capacity BUT with the pump i installed there is never even a gallon of water in the boat

The REAL issues i see are boats like a C&C 35 Mark I that literally do not have ANY bilge
__________________
1970 Cal 29 Sea Fever

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1981 J24 Tangent 2930
Tommays
Northport NY


If a dirty bottom slows you down what do you think it does to your boat
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 08-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HI
Posts: 2,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 4
casey1999 is on a distinguished road
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

I cannot imagine why anyone would install a Dripless Shaft seal. Why install somthing on your boat that could fail at any moment and sink your boat? I thought about installing one until a friend whom has one tells me how rapidly they can fail. Dripless not for me.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 08-21-2012
CalebD's Avatar
Tartan 27' owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,440
Thanks: 4
Thanked 74 Times in 67 Posts
Rep Power: 7
CalebD will become famous soon enough
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

Think about it it like this.
It is probably cheaper for Catalina to go with the traditional stuffing box then a dripless shaft seal. The traditional stuffing box gradually exhibits failure mode as more water gets in as packing wears away. (New packing is < $20) If the Dripless Shaft Seal rubber bellows ever cracks, rips or otherwise fails you may need a haul out and a new bellows.
I'm with Catalina on this one. The traditional stuffing box is a tried and true, hundred+ year old technology. Using this method saves them money and makes their boats a little bit safer. It is a no brainer.
__________________
"The cure for anything is salt water~ sweat, tears, or the sea." ~Isak Denesen

Everybody has one:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 08-21-2012
PBzeer's Avatar
Wandering Aimlessly
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cruising
Posts: 19,051
Thanks: 0
Thanked 61 Times in 60 Posts
Rep Power: 14
PBzeer has a spectacular aura about PBzeer has a spectacular aura about PBzeer has a spectacular aura about
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

My boat came with a dripless shaft seal. I've had no problems with it.
__________________
John
Ontario 32 - Aria

Free, is the heart, that lives not, in fear.
Full, is the spirit, that thinks not, of falling.
True, is the soul, that hesitates not, to give.
Alive, is the one, that believes, in love.
JCP


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- Website & Blog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 08-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HI
Posts: 2,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 4
casey1999 is on a distinguished road
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

Quote:
Originally Posted by PBzeer View Post
My boat came with a dripless shaft seal. I've had no problems with it.
Until you boat sinks...
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 08-21-2012
jameswilson29's Avatar
Senior Smart Aleck
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 1,857
Thanks: 18
Thanked 52 Times in 47 Posts
Rep Power: 5
jameswilson29 is on a distinguished road
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

Are there any statistics supporting the assertion that a traditional stuffing box is safer than a dripless shaft seal (DSS)?

I would think the insurance companies would consider a DSS an additional risk factor and increase the premium if this were true, especially if its failure results in a total loss.

I have read and heard merely anecdotal evidence of DSSs failing, including an article in Boat/US magazine. A DSS is a moving part, which needs periodic inspection and replacement in due time (10 years?).

I am not surprised that a production builder would use a less expensive traditional part based on an unsubstantiated belief among buyers.
jrd22, T37Chef, MedSailor and 1 others like this.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 08-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HI
Posts: 2,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 4
casey1999 is on a distinguished road
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

Quote:
Originally Posted by jameswilson29 View Post
Are there any statistics supporting the assertion that a traditional stuffing box is safer than a dripless shaft seal (DSS)?

I would think the insurance companies would consider a DSS an additional risk factor and increase the premium if this were true, especially if its failure results in a total loss.

I have read and heard merely anecdotal evidence of DSSs failing, including an article in Boat/US magazine. A DSS is a moving part, which needs periodic inspection and replacement in due time (10 years?).

I am not surprised that a production builder would use a less expensive traditional part based on an unsubstantiated belief among buyers.
I am not sure on the statistics. But I hear a lot of bad things:
Emergency advise needed on a leaking pss dripless shaft seal ! [Archive] - Boat Repair Forum, Classifieds & Photo Gallery

I do not think insurace companies get that involved with how you boat is made, although maybe they should. Insuranace companies do not care if you use plastic through hulls or chinese carbon steel chain for you anchor rode. Like your car they do not raise your rates because your SUV has tires on it that have been recalled and are known to blow out at highway speeds. Buyer beware.

Last edited by casey1999; 08-21-2012 at 09:11 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 08-21-2012
jrd22's Avatar
Courtney the Dancer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Juan Islands., WA, USA
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 14
jrd22 will become famous soon enough
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

I've had both. From my perspective I can't see a lot of difference as far as risk to the boat goes. The stuffing box uses a piece of heavy duty hose to hold the packing gland and there is arguably more torque on that hose from the friction of the packing than from the carbon block sliding on the stainless ring of a dripless type. Which is more likely to rip or tear and create a large leak? How often do you change that hose, I'm guessing most people have never changed it or even thought about the torque put on it. Dripless types recommend that the bellows (which is very thick and heavy duty) be changed every 8-10 years IIRC and that includes the hose clamps, and I just can't see one failing in that short amount of time. Another aspect is shaft wear, not a safety issue, but an expense over time from wear at the packing. There is no wear on the shaft of the dripless type. I'm not convinced that there is a big difference either way from a safety perspective but if there were any statistics that compared failures of the two types I'd be interested to see them.
JimMcGee, Melrna, T37Chef and 3 others like this.
__________________
John
SV Laurie Anne

1988 Brewer 40 Pilothouse

Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 08-21-2012
eherlihy's Avatar
Will work to sail. :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 3,167
Thanks: 71
Thanked 41 Times in 40 Posts
Rep Power: 8
eherlihy will become famous soon enough
Re: Dripless Shaft Seal versus Stuffing Box

I believe that jrd22 hit the nails on the head. Less wear & tear on the shaft is a major positive attribute of a dripless system.

I swapped my stuffing box over to a PSS dripless last year. I was impressed by the quality of the components, and the statement that most PWCs use them (anything that can survive a PWC is a good thing). I was, however shocked at the price, and the fact that the recommended replacement interval is 6 years, although I believe that they could run for 10.

Quote:
As with any rubber hose below waterline, the PSS bellows must be inspected on a regular basis for any sign of wear, aging or chemical deterioration. PYI suggests preventative maintenance. The PSS bellow should be replaced in six year intervals. During bellows replacement it is recommended the o-rings & set screws in the stainless steel rotor also be replaced.

Bellows may need to be more frequently inspected in an environment where non-sealed batteries emit sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid vapor will accelerate rubber deterioration, as will an ozonater.
Ever since replacement I have had NOT A DROP of water in the bilge.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

USCG Licensed OUPV Captain, ASA 101/103/104/105 Certified Instructor - Also certified in Recreational Marine Electrical Systems
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dripless Packing seal is Dripping Valmika Gear & Maintenance 7 04-23-2011 09:55 PM
stuffing box replacement: traditional or dripless stiffwind Gear & Maintenance 18 09-30-2010 05:14 PM
Shaft alignment with a dripless seal Downunder Gear & Maintenance 6 05-11-2010 03:30 PM
PYI dripless seal leaking drynoc Gear & Maintenance 18 01-19-2010 07:04 AM
Dripless vs Flax Stuffing Boxes NOSOEWE Gear & Maintenance 15 11-07-2009 07:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012