3/16 instead of 1/2 " Stuffing ? - SailNet Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 04-26-2013 Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 50
Thanks: 23
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
3/16 instead of 1/2 " Stuffing ?

Hey guys, I know it's unusual, maybe not, I could not pound in the 1/4 inch waxed rope into the nut, ( this one goes into the nut, not the sleeve. So I am considering using 5-6 wraps of 3/16. What say you ?
GaiaOrion is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old 04-26-2013
Junior member, rest old
 
msmith10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 497
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: 3/16 instead of 1/2 " Stuffing ?

There should be a specified size for a specific stuffing box and shaft. If 1/4" won't fit, obviously you'll need to go down. However, I wouldn't rely on lots of rings of smaller size to replace fewer rings of the proper size.

Mark Smith
1977 C&C 30 Mk 1 hailing from Port Clinton, Ohio
msmith10 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 4 Old 04-26-2013
Old as Dirt!
 
svHyLyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 15
Thanked 129 Times in 122 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: 3/16 instead of 1/2 " Stuffing ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaiaOrion View Post
Hey guys, I know it's unusual, maybe not, I could not pound in the 1/4 inch waxed rope into the nut, ( this one goes into the nut, not the sleeve. So I am considering using 5-6 wraps of 3/16. What say you ?
In a traditional stuffing box design, one does not "pound" anything into anything. Packing, either waxed or greased flax or Teflon impregnated glass fiber is usually square in shape and is wrapped around the shaft with the overlaps cut a a 45 angle to make a single continuous ring around the shaft. There are usually 3 rings with the 45 cuts spaced 120 apart. The packing nut passes over these and is tightened down, compressing the packing rings against the shaft on one side and the inside face of the packing nut on the other. Once adjusted for a drip rate of approximately one drip every 20 seconds or so for traditional greased/waxed packing, or minute or so, or less, for Teflon impregnated packing, the Locking nut is tightened against the packing nut to hold the packing nut in place. Waxed twine "ain't" gonna do the job.

It would be wise to do a little goggling of Shaft Packing Glands to get an idea of what you are doing before experimenting with such an important piece of equipment, no?

"It is not so much for its beauty that the sea makes a claim upon men's hearts, as for that subtle something, that quality of air, that emanation from the waves, that so wonderfully renews a weary spirit."

Last edited by svHyLyte; 04-26-2013 at 01:30 PM. Reason: Addendum
svHyLyte is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 4 Old 04-26-2013
Tartan 27' owner
 
CalebD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,758
Thanks: 5
Thanked 107 Times in 99 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: 3/16 instead of 1/2 " Stuffing ?

If you have to pound or otherwise force, cram or jam the packing into your packing gland then the size of packing material you are using is too big.
You should be using the largest size of packing that easily fits into the space in the packing gland. The tension from the packing nuts will make the packing material fill up the rest of the space.
Using an over sized packing material is a bad idea all around. You can score your prop shaft if the fit is too tight and it would be unlikely that you could achieve the proper drip rate using oversized packing material. Been there, done that; had to replace the 1/4" packing for 3/16" with my 1" shaft to achieve the right drip rate.

"The cure for anything is salt water~ sweat, tears, or the sea." ~Isak Denesen

Everybody has one:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
CalebD is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Seacock" vs. "ballcock" or "ball valve?" SEMIJim Gear & Maintenance 18 09-02-2013 05:31 PM
VIDEO: Coast Guard Academy Welcomes "Blue Goose" and "Stormy Petrel" - Patch.com NewsReader News Feeds 0 07-28-2012 07:50 AM
C270 Main Sail "stack Pack", Quick Cover", "lazy Bag" Install randy22556 Catalina 1 02-28-2007 11:53 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome