Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related)
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-15-2013
PaulinVictoria's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,881
Thanks: 7
Thanked 45 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6
PaulinVictoria is on a distinguished road
Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Our current dinghies consist of a small zodiac, which is nice and stable, but with the slatted floor and the small size, isn't an ideal dog and Admiral transporter, and a traditional style hard dinghy which has a little more space and is indestructible, but unless you use laser positioning to get yourself exactly into the centre when you get in and out, you are going swimming.
I saw a little tri-hull up for sale, how would they compare with a zodiac in terms of stability? I don't care if it won't get up on a plane etc as it's only going to have 2.5hp anyway, but otherwise it ticks a lot of boxes as a tender.
__________________
Orange Crush
1974 C&C27 MkII

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 08-15-2013
tdw's Avatar
tdw tdw is online now
Super Fuzzy Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 14,411
Thanks: 5
Thanked 68 Times in 63 Posts
Rep Power: 10
tdw is a jewel in the rough tdw is a jewel in the rough tdw is a jewel in the rough
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Mates of ours have recently ditched their inflatable for a tri hull. Mind you they have a 40+'er so the thing can be stowed upside down on the foredeck. Whether that is doable on 27'er may well be another matter altogether.

stability wise ..... brilliant.
__________________
Andrew B

"Do you think God gets stoned? I think so... Look at the platypus." Robin Williams.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 08-16-2013
PaulinVictoria's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,881
Thanks: 7
Thanked 45 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6
PaulinVictoria is on a distinguished road
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

It's only 8', so not really any bigger then the zodiac or the hard dinghy. Hmm, definitely an option to explore I think.
Sunday Driver likes this.
__________________
Orange Crush
1974 C&C27 MkII

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 08-16-2013
PaulinVictoria's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,881
Thanks: 7
Thanked 45 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6
PaulinVictoria is on a distinguished road
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Or how about a tri-hull versus a Walker Bay RID?
__________________
Orange Crush
1974 C&C27 MkII

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 08-16-2013
caberg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 584
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 3
caberg is on a distinguished road
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

When you say tri-hull, I assume you mean something like what I have which is this: WEST MARINE WaterTender 9.4 Rowing Dinghy at West Marine

It's not as stable as a zodiac, I'm sure, but I find it to have all the stability that we need. I can stand anywhere inside--all the way to one side or up on the bow seat--and it will not go over. Routinely, we have two adults, a child, and maybe 20-30 pounds of gear, and I've never once felt unstable. My 4 year old and I will go rowing and fishing in it and he bounces all over that thing without a problem. I've had as many as 3 adults and two older kids, plus gear, and that was pushing capacity but doable. We've had our ~60 pound lab in there, and that was no problem from a stability standpoint. Plus, it rows really well.

As compared to the complimentary 7-8' hard regular dinks that my marina offers, it's a world of difference for the loads that we normally put in. We used the complimentary dinks for a month or so, and I definitely did feel vulnerable to capsize in those.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
The Following User Says Thank You to caberg For This Useful Post:
blutoyz (08-16-2013)
  #6  
Old 08-16-2013
Alex W's Avatar
always busy with sailing
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,289
Thanks: 2
Thanked 137 Times in 131 Posts
Rep Power: 2
Alex W is on a distinguished road
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Not all rigid dinks are the same. If I remember correctly you have a Ranger Minto or something like it, with a very round hull shape. Those are sensitive to weight placement.

We have a Dyer Dhow Midget that has a much flatter bottom. It is from a design originally made in plywood, so it has hard chines with a shallow v. It isn't as stable as a Zodiac, but it is much more stable than the Minto. I routinely stand up in it for instance. It's under 8' though, and would be tight for 2 adults and 2 dogs.

It fits well on the foredeck of our 28' boat. Does your C&C 27 have a babystay? That would make things tougher. The squarer shape of the tri-hull boats would kill access to the anchor locker on my Pearson, while a more pointed shape like what is on my Dyer allows me to push the dinghy over a little bit to open the locker.

I've read that Walker Bay dinghies are not stable, but the tube kit might make all of the difference. Down here (Seattle) they are easy to find used, maybe the same is true up there. At least then if the boat doesn't work out you can sell it for the same price that you paid.
__________________
boats that I sail on regularly: Pearson 28-2, Rondar 505, Yankee 30, Blanchard Junior
Seattle, WA
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 08-16-2013
chucklesR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pasadena Md - Magothy side
Posts: 5,978
Thanks: 10
Thanked 30 Times in 30 Posts
Rep Power: 10
chucklesR is a jewel in the rough chucklesR is a jewel in the rough chucklesR is a jewel in the rough
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

I've pretty much settled on the fact that my next (and 'go cruising') dinghy will be a Livingston 10
It's heavy, it's stable, it's indestructible, and at 2k it's half the cost of a comparable RIB.
__________________
Lessons learned are opportunities earned.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 08-16-2013
BarryL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 3
Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 12
BarryL is on a distinguished road
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Hey,

My boat is on a mooring and I use a dingy to row out to her. Over the years I have had a number of dinks:

First one was an old Sumner 8' fiberglass boat that someone was throwing away. One gunnel was rotted. I fixed it up (poorly) and used it for a year. It rowed well and was easy to drag up and down the beach but was unstable and could not hold much.

Second boat was an old Water tender, not the tri hull. It was plastic, so it was light and easy to drag. It held a decent amount of gear and rowed well. It was more stable than the first boat but not very stable, especially in the bow.

Eventually the water tender wore out from being dragged up and down. Last year I replaced it with a new Watertender 9.4 tri hull. This one, as mentioned above, is very stable. I haven't used an inflatable, but the tri hull does make the boat stable and you can stand almost anywhere and not feel like it's going to tip. It is pretty light and easy to move. I don't think it rowed well because of the tri hull. It certainly does not row as well as the older style boat or a Walker Bay.

This spring my watertender was stolen. I replaced it with a used Walker Bay 10. The 10' WB is just about as stable as the Watertender 9.4 and rows better. The WB 10 is wide and that definitely helps. Mine came with the inflatable tube around the hull but I removed it because I have to store the boat on it's side. The downside the WB10 is that it is very heavy. Mine had a sail kit at one time, so there is a floor, centerboard trunk, mast mount and some other stuff too. I thought that since it was plastic it would be light but it isn't. The damn thing almost kills me when I get to the beach at low tide and have to drag it up the beach to the rack. I'm trying to think of a dolly that would work in soft sand but I haven't built one yet.

Hope this helps.

Barry
__________________
Barry Lenoble
Deep Blue C, 2002 C&C 110
Mt. Sinai, NY

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 08-16-2013
caberg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 584
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 3
caberg is on a distinguished road
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryL View Post
I don't think it rowed well because of the tri hull. It certainly does not row as well as the older style boat or a Walker Bay.
I wonder if this had to do with the oars you were using. I find my Watertender 9.4 to row very well, even better than the regular 8' monohull fiberglass dinks that I've used. I have nice, but pricey, Caviness aluminum oars with clamp-on oar locks. I think these oars would be too big and bulky on a smaller dink, but perfectly matched for the size of the Watertender 9.4, and really propel and steer it nicely. I had to use an old, smaller pair of wooden oars on the Watertender one time and it did not row nearly as well.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 08-16-2013
SloopJonB's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 10,745
Thanks: 56
Thanked 51 Times in 48 Posts
Rep Power: 4
SloopJonB will become famous soon enough
Re: Zodiac vs tri-hull for dinghy

Paul, locally, Horizon produced an 8' dink that was much like a miniature Boston Whaler. I think one of them might suit you. Not very heavy and well built.

Much nicer than the Livingstones but I doubt it would have the same carrying capacity.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zodiac Repair calmharbor Gear & Maintenance 3 09-07-2012 02:52 AM
Zodiac PROJET 350 REPAIR Yofy Gear & Maintenance 0 01-17-2012 10:27 AM
Zodiac Repair? mdittr Gear & Maintenance 0 06-24-2011 03:13 AM
Zodiac T240 polo07 Gear & Maintenance 0 05-25-2006 05:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.