California boat reg . - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 Old 10-10-2013 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Markwesti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 659
Thanks: 94
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
Rep Power: 3
 
California boat reg .

Here in the land of fruits and nuts our State law makers are at it again . We are now required to pay a fee of $16. per reg. so that's double for most (dingy). All for Quagga and zebra mussel infestation . WHOA hold on I just looked a little harder at my reg. renewal, I'm exempt ! It says exempt if your in the Ocean. Any how I still think this is BS. Like their really going to do something about the problem, is there a problem? this reminds me of the time we were required to pay a use fee . (about 20 yrs. ago) they said send us your money or the Coasties will board you . Coasties said what? Don't think so. Well now their getting smarter(?) just send em' a bill.
Markwesti is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 Old 10-10-2013
Senior Slacker
 
SlowButSteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
re: California boat reg .

Invasive species are a huge problem. California has been expending a lot of effort and funds to keep Dreissena spp. (the genus to which both zebra and quagga mussels belong) from becoming a serious problem in this state. Right now D. polymorpha (zebra mussels) cause more than half a billion dollars worth of damage to the Great Lakes every year. Would you rather have the California economy take a half-billion dollar per year hit, or have the most likely vector of Dreissena introductions pay a modest fee to fund efforts to avoid such?

Never forget them. Do something to prevent it from happening again.
Charlotte Bacon, Daniel Barden, Rachel Davino, Olivia Josephine Gay, Ana M. Marquez-Greene, Dylan Hockley, Dawn Hochsprung, Madeleine F. Hsu, Catherine V. Hubbard, Chase Kowalski, Jesse Lewis, James Mattioli , Grace McDonnell, Anne Marie Murphy, Emilie Parker, Jack Pinto, Noah Pozner, Caroline Previdi, Jessica Rekos, Avielle Richman, Lauren Rousseau, Mary Sherlach, Victoria Soto, Benjamin Wheeler, Allison N. Wyatt
SlowButSteady is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 13 Old 10-10-2013
Senior Member
 
azguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 568
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
re: California boat reg .

We have the problem here in Arizona, it's a very bad problem for inland water ways.

The problem is these fees never get to the source of the problem, they get eaten up by officials along the way.
azguy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 13 Old 10-10-2013 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Markwesti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 659
Thanks: 94
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
Rep Power: 3
 
Re: California boat reg .

Double down on AZguy .
Markwesti is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 13 Old 10-10-2013
Senior Member
 
poopdeckpappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,139
Thanks: 35
Thanked 42 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
Re: California boat reg .

Here's the problem with this added reg cost, AB703,433 & SB497 addesses this problem at the source, amendments in 2008 & 2009 increase the per vessel fee to ensure adequate funds were available to meet program requirements. To extend this to a per vessel scope that includes dinghies and runabouts or anyother non water ballast vessel is ludicrous. I don't know of any dink or runabout that has a Ballast or one that should fall under the Ballast Water Management Program nor do I know of any dink or runabout that travels beyond the states EEZ.

I can tell you (Based on years of prior experience with this kind of stuff ) the funds collected to fight the spread of nonindigenous aquatic species into the state waters of California will be siphoned off to fund non related programs, Just like what happened with the Green & Red sticker program for OHV's.

Sorry for the simi rant but this is just another ruze and nothing less.

1955 Blanchard 51 Custom ( I got a woody )

Lord, give me coffee to change the things I can change and Rum to accept the things I can't
poopdeckpappy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 13 Old 10-10-2013
snake charmer, cat herder
 
zeehag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: refitting a formosa in exotic tropical locations....
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 8
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: California boat reg .

arent cali boat registrations for 2 two years??????

and arent they only 16 usd for 2 TWO years?????
wtf is the problem,mon...if i could do that, why cannot you.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

formosa 41, cruising tropics


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
zeehag is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 13 Old 10-11-2013
Senior Member
 
overbored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dana Point, Ca
Posts: 1,190
Thanks: 1
Thanked 62 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: California boat reg .

Quote:
Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy View Post
Here's the problem with this added reg cost, AB703,433 & SB497 addesses this problem at the source, amendments in 2008 & 2009 increase the per vessel fee to ensure adequate funds were available to meet program requirements. To extend this to a per vessel scope that includes dinghies and runabouts or anyother non water ballast vessel is ludicrous. I don't know of any dink or runabout that has a Ballast or one that should fall under the Ballast Water Management Program nor do I know of any dink or runabout that travels beyond the states EEZ.

I can tell you (Based on years of prior experience with this kind of stuff ) the funds collected to fight the spread of nonindigenous aquatic species into the state waters of California will be siphoned off to fund non related programs, Just like what happened with the Green & Red sticker program for OHV's.

Sorry for the simi rant but this is just another ruze and nothing less.
its not just water ballast that they care about . engines are water cooled and can transfer the evasive species. show up at any inland fresh water launch ramp and you will be required to show that your engine and boat is dry. they make you lower the outdrive and if water comes out of the engine or the boat drain plug you will not be allowed to launch

"FULL TILT II" 2011 BENETEAU FIRST 30
"FULL TILT" SOVEREL 33
"GOLD RUSH" PRINDLE 16
overbored is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 13 Old 10-11-2013
Senior Member
 
poopdeckpappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,139
Thanks: 35
Thanked 42 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 12
     
Re: California boat reg .

Quote:
wtf is the problem,mon...if i could do that, why cannot you.
The problem is not in the doing it, I do it every couple years, the problem is where it goes, or better yet where it hasn't gone. Another 8.5 million a year on top of the millions/yr collected since 2002?............. come on, we could have built tiny little condos for the little buggers by now

1955 Blanchard 51 Custom ( I got a woody )

Lord, give me coffee to change the things I can change and Rum to accept the things I can't
poopdeckpappy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 13 Old 10-11-2013
Senior Slacker
 
SlowButSteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
Re: California boat reg .

Quote:
Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy View Post
Here's the problem with this added reg cost, AB703,433 & SB497 addesses this problem at the source, amendments in 2008 & 2009 increase the per vessel fee to ensure adequate funds were available to meet program requirements....
I believe all of those bills concerned the introduction of marine and estuarine species from foreign ports via large ships. The topic at hand is the introduction of freshwater mussels into California from other areas of the US.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy View Post
... To extend this to a per vessel scope that includes dinghies and runabouts or anyother non water ballast vessel is ludicrous. I don't know of any dink or runabout that has a Ballast or one that should fall under the Ballast Water Management Program nor do I know of any dink or runabout that travels beyond the states EEZ....
Freshwater mussels are usually transported as adults adhered to boat hulls and inside thru-hulls, rather than larvae in ballast tanks. A few small adults stuck to the inside of the centerboard trunk of your dink could easily spread zebra mussels to areas not already infested.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy View Post
...I can tell you (Based on years of prior experience with this kind of stuff ) the funds collected to fight the spread of nonindigenous aquatic species into the state waters of California will be siphoned off to fund non related programs...yadda...yadda...yadda...
An excuse often used to argue against just about any government program, no matter how necessary, that WRWs don't like. Tell us, how much do YOU think boaters should pay to help prevent boats from being the mechanism causing the introduction of these pests? After-all, we're talking about critters that cause more than $500,000,000/year worth of damage to the Great Lakes region, and could easily cause as much or more economic impact in California (just think about what might happen if the Federal and State water projects couldn't function because they were clogged with mussels). Or do you think the funds necessary for such a prevention program should come from people who are far less likely to be responsible for FW mussel introductions???

Never forget them. Do something to prevent it from happening again.
Charlotte Bacon, Daniel Barden, Rachel Davino, Olivia Josephine Gay, Ana M. Marquez-Greene, Dylan Hockley, Dawn Hochsprung, Madeleine F. Hsu, Catherine V. Hubbard, Chase Kowalski, Jesse Lewis, James Mattioli , Grace McDonnell, Anne Marie Murphy, Emilie Parker, Jack Pinto, Noah Pozner, Caroline Previdi, Jessica Rekos, Avielle Richman, Lauren Rousseau, Mary Sherlach, Victoria Soto, Benjamin Wheeler, Allison N. Wyatt
SlowButSteady is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 13 Old 10-11-2013
Senior Slacker
 
SlowButSteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
Re: California boat reg .

Quote:
Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy View Post
The problem is not in the doing it, I do it every couple years, the problem is where it goes, or better yet where it hasn't gone. Another 8.5 million a year on top of the millions/yr collected since 2002?.............yadda...yadda...yadda...
Think for a moment, poopy. The "burdened rate" for a Fish and Wildlife Warden is at least $100,000/year (probably more). So, $8,500,000/year will only fund 85 additional F&W Warden positions (probably less) for the entire state. That's for manning inspection stations/patrols over all of the states lakes and waterways. So we're talking about one or two additional Warden positions per county. And that doesn't include funding research, logistic support, et cetera.

Never forget them. Do something to prevent it from happening again.
Charlotte Bacon, Daniel Barden, Rachel Davino, Olivia Josephine Gay, Ana M. Marquez-Greene, Dylan Hockley, Dawn Hochsprung, Madeleine F. Hsu, Catherine V. Hubbard, Chase Kowalski, Jesse Lewis, James Mattioli , Grace McDonnell, Anne Marie Murphy, Emilie Parker, Jack Pinto, Noah Pozner, Caroline Previdi, Jessica Rekos, Avielle Richman, Lauren Rousseau, Mary Sherlach, Victoria Soto, Benjamin Wheeler, Allison N. Wyatt

Last edited by SlowButSteady; 10-11-2013 at 12:27 AM.
SlowButSteady is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So. California - Good small boat sailing locations rlltrash General Discussion (sailing related) 4 07-15-2012 11:48 PM
California Man Rescued After Whale Sinks Boat - Fox News NewsReader News Feeds 0 06-15-2012 01:30 AM
Boat from California to Hawaii bridgetmurphy Crew Wanted/Available 3 02-29-2012 04:56 PM
Boat Sitter - California alh719 Introduce Yourself 2 06-09-2010 12:19 AM
Boat shipping from California to Washington Strangeflow General Discussion (sailing related) 7 04-06-2008 02:01 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome