masthead versus fractional rig? - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 Old 12-08-2013 Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunshine Coast, British Columbia
Posts: 46
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
masthead versus fractional rig?

Why aren't all sloops one design - either masthead or fractional rigged? Is there an advantage of one over the other? I would think that a masthead rigged boat could accomodate a larger jib/genoa but there has to be reasons why some sailors and designers prefer the fractional rig.
tspooner is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 23 Old 12-08-2013
Senior Member
davidpm's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison
Posts: 4,554
Thanks: 373
Thanked 78 Times in 68 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

There are real engineers here that can give you more details but their are advantages to both.
The mast head rig is stronger. As you tighten the back stay you are directly tensioning the forestay.

Historically to beat rules the mast height was kept low and the foresail was made as big as possible, overlapping the mast as the overlap did not count according to the rules at the time.

Once the rules changed it was found that the boat would be faster and easier to handle with a taller mast, larger main and smaller foresail.

Rigging as fractional the back stay could now be used to bend the mast depending on wind conditions which controlled sail shape and made the boat even faster.

In this design the boat speed was improved by making the main sail larger and more controllable and the jib smaller.

Sometime runners had to be added to support the mast in certain conditions but it was considered worth the trouble for the speed.

So in short the fractional rig introduces some issues but can make the boat faster.

The lesson from the Icarus story is not about human failing.
It is a lesson about the limitations of wax as an adhesive.
If you have an engineering problem solve it.

Last edited by davidpm; 12-08-2013 at 10:28 AM.
davidpm is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
The Following User Says Thank You to davidpm For This Useful Post:
tspooner (12-09-2013)
post #3 of 23 Old 12-08-2013
Moody 46
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on board
Posts: 121
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 11
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

Davidpm is right. Main reason is performance. Fractional allows one to significantly rake the spar giving the main much improved windward power while not affecting foresail shape. Disadvantage is one needs to pay more attention to rig whilst underway especially if runners are used as is the usual case on performance rigs. Other downside (race boats don't care) is fractional rig is not really amenable to cutter set up. Having the option to use an inner-stay and small foresail in heavy wx makes heaving to and crawling to weather easier.
christian.hess likes this.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
orthomartin is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 23 Old 12-08-2013
no longer reading SailNet
Alex W's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,309
Thanks: 2
Thanked 141 Times in 134 Posts
Rep Power: 5
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

I would prefer a fractional rig even on a cruising boat. It is a lot nicer to carry one non-overlapping headsail (or maybe two) and use reefing on the main to reduce sail area in a blow. Even on my post-IOR masthead boat (where the main is an effective sail) I carry 2 or 3 headsails for different wind conditions. Slab reefing on a main is a lot more effective than rolling up a roller furled jib, and not much more work.

The performance advantages would be nice too.

A downside of fractional rig is that the mast is taller for a same sail area. For instance there is a Hunter 28 on my dock that always surprises me with it's very tall mast (about 5-6' taller than the one on my Pearson 28-2). When I first saw it I thought "wow, a Hunter with a big SA/D?". However when I looked up the specs it has about the same sail area as my boat (less when I fly my genoa), just demands the taller mast to put that sail area in to the main.

I'm no longer participating on SailNet.
Alex W is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 23 Old 12-08-2013
Just another Moderator
Faster's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 19,136
Thanks: 153
Thanked 545 Times in 519 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

As mentioned, a Frac rig is more dynamic and 'tunable' for the conditions.. well designed it means smaller headsails and spinnakers, making things easier to handle and loads lighter, while putting a fair bit of horsepower in the larger mainsail that is easily managed with main trim controls.

Our boat fits the bill, though as a 3/4 frac we lack some power in light air. Most Fracs tend to run around 7/8, a good compromise.
christian.hess likes this.


1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 23 Old 12-08-2013
Senior Member
christian.hess's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 4,589
Thanks: 189
Thanked 190 Times in 185 Posts
Rep Power: 4
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

I loved my frac rig folkboat...massive rake for when you need it, better weather performance and nice downwind ease too...kind of like dinghy sailing
christian.hess is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 23 Old 12-08-2013
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 1,327
Thanks: 16
Thanked 77 Times in 75 Posts
Rep Power: 8
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

One additional advantage is fractional rigs work well with code zero furlers.
capecodda is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 23 Old 12-09-2013
Senior Member
paulk's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CT/ Long Island Sound
Posts: 2,845
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 18
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

I also read (Markaj?) that the vortices created by the wind blowing over the sails in a fractional rig are better (bigger? more pronounced?? faster-turning???.... better) than those created in a similar-sized masthead rig. The shape of the leading edge of the sails is apparently more optimal for upwind work, apparently. We love ours. We've sailed past every masthead-rigged J/35 we've come up against, and we're supposed to rate some 8 sec/mile slower in our J/36
christian.hess likes this.
paulk is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 23 Old 12-09-2013
Senior Member
capt vimes's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 626
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 4
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

Originally Posted by orthomartin View Post
... Other downside (race boats don't care) is fractional rig is not really amenable to cutter set up. ...
i do not see that...
and i know of a lot of boats having a fractional cutter rig:
Nos voiliers

just to name a few...
it is btw my favorite rig configuration only beaten by cat shooner/ketches with free standing, rotating masts - although i never came to sail one of those...
capt vimes is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 23 Old 12-09-2013
Jeff_H's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 7,506
Thanks: 12
Thanked 248 Times in 198 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Re: masthead versus fractional rig?

I apologize I wrote this for another purpose and is a bit long, but it discussed the pro's and cons of masthead vs fractionally rigged sloops, as well as the cutter rig.

Sloops and Cutters are the most common rigs being produced today. In current usage these terms are applied quite loosely as compared to their more traditional definitions. Traditionally the sloop rig was a rig with a single mast located forward of 50% of the length of the sailplan. In this traditional definition a sloop could have multiple jibs.

Cutters had a rig with a single mast located 50% of the length of the sailplan or further aft, multiple headsails and in older definitions, a reefing bowsprit (a bowsprit that could be withdrawn in heavy going). Somewhere in the 1950's or 1960's there was a shift in these definitions such that a sloop only flew one headsail and a cutter had multiple headsails and mast position became irrelevant. For the sake of this discussion I assume we are discussing the modern definition of a sloop and a cutter.

Historically, when sail handling hardware was primitive and sails were far more stretchy than they are today, the smaller headsails and mainsail of a traditional cutter were easier to handle and with less sail stretch, allowed earlier cutters to be more weatherly (sail closer to the wind) than the sloops of the day. With the invention of lower stretch sailcloth and geared winches, cutters quickly lost their earlier advantage.

Today sloops are generally closer winded and easier to handle. Their smaller jibs and larger mainsail sailplan are easier to power up and down. Without a jibstay to drag the Genoa across, sloops are generally easier to tack. With less hardware sloops are less expensive to build.

Sloops come in a couple varieties, masthead and fractional. In a masthead rig the forestay and jib originates at the masthead. In a fractional rig, the forestay originates some fraction of the mast height down from the masthead. Historically, sloops were traditionally fractionally rigged. Since the earliest wind tunnel tests (1920’s) it has been understood that fractional rigs with minimally overlapping headsails tend to generate the most drive per square foot of sail area. This efficiency advantage has to do with a variety of factors such as sail interation and minimized tip vortexes.

But fractional rigs make sense for a variety of more practical reasons. Their smaller jibs are easier to tack and in a building breeze, they are easier to depower and then reef down to a snug masthead rig. Because virtually all boats develop some weather helm with heel angle, reefing the mainsail, while leaving the jib, makes sense in terms of balancing the helm. But also because the jib represents a smaller portion of the overall sail area, one jib can often function across an extremely wide range of windspeeds. Fractional rigs generally place a lower stress on their hulls and often get by with lighter rigging and hardware for an equal structural safety margin.

Today, modern fractional rigs are often proportioned so that they do not need headsails that overlap the shrouds making them even easier to sail. One of the major advantages of a fractional rig is the ability, especially when combined with a flexible mast, to use the backstay to control mast bend and sail shape. Increasing backstay tension does a lot of things on a fractional rig: it tensions the forestay which in turn flattens the jib, and opnes the head of the jib. Increasing backstay tension induces controlled mast bend, which flattens the mainsail and opens the leech of the mainsail. This allows quick depowering as the wind increases and so allows a fractional rig to sail in a wider wind speed range without reefing, or making a headsail change than a masthead rig, although arguably requiring a bit more sail trimming skills.

To a great extent, the smaller jib on a fractional rig eliminates the need for a jibstaysail, with its added hardware, complexity, and the assocated diffuculty tacking a genoa around the jibstay, as might be found on a cutter or a sloop which had a jibstay when intended for offshore use.

In the past fractional rigs used to require running backstays. But today better spar materials and design approaches have pretty much eliminated the need for running backstays. That said, fractional rigs intended for offshore use, will often have running backstays that are only rigged in heavy weather once the mainsail has been reefed. The geometry of these running backstays typically allows the boat to be tacked without tacking the running backstays and larger fractionally rigged race boats will often have checkstays.

Masthead rigs came into popularity in the 1950's primarily in response to racing rating rules that under-penalized overlapping jibs (genoas) and spinnakers and so promoted bigger headsails. Masthead sloops tend to be simpler rigs to build and adjust. They tend to be more dependent on large headsails and so are harder to tack and also require a larger headsail inventory if performance is important. Mast bend is harder to control and so bigger masthead rigs will often have a babystay that can be tensioned to prevent pumping and induce mast bend in the same way as a fractional rig does. But dragging a Genoa over the babystay makes tacking a bit more difficult and slower. While roller furling allows a wider wind range for any given Genoa, there is a real limit (typically cited 10% to 15%) to how much a Genoa can be roller furled and still maintain a safely flat shape. As a result, masthead rigged boats generally require more sails in their sail inventories and more frequent sail changes to address the same wind range as a fractional rig.

Masthead sloops which are intended for offshore use are often fitted with a jibstay which allows them to fly smaller sails in heavier weather. Depending on the specific rig design, these often require running backstays as well, with a geometry which needs to be tacked in heavy air. The smaller headsails on fractionally rigged sloops generally eliminate the need for this intermediate jibstay. That said, as fractional rigs have been used on larger boats and with larger fractions (i.e. 15/16th) it has become more common to see jibstays added on frac's intended for offshore use.

Masthead rigs generally carried larger spinnakers, which in the past gave them an advantage on deep reaches and when heading dead downwind. But modern fractional rigs, often carry masthead spinnakers eliminating this former advantage.

Cutters, which had pretty much dropped out of popularity during a period from right after the end of WWII until the early 1970's, came back into popularity with a vengeance in the early 1970's as an offshore cruising rig. In theory, the presence of multiple jibs allows the forestaysail to be dropped or completely furled, and the resultant combined reefed mainsail, and the full staysail, results in a very compact heavy weather rig (similar to the proportions of a fractional rigged sloop with a reef in the mainsail). As a result, traditionalists often cite the cutter rig as the ideal offshore rig.

While that is the theory, it rarely works out that the staysail is properly proportioned, (either too small for normal sailing needs and for the lower end of the high wind range (say 20-30 knots) or too large for higher windspeeds) and also is either made of a sail cloth that makes sense as a heavy weather sail but which is too heavy for day to day sailing in more moderate conditions or out of a sail cloth too light for heavy going. When the jibstaysails are proportioned small enough to be used as heavy weather sails, cutter rigs will often develop a lot of weather helm when being sailed in winds that are too slow to use a double reefed mainsail. Like fractional rigs, cutter rigs intended for offshore use, will often have running backstays that are only rigged in heavy weather once the mainsail has been reefed. Unlike the fractional rig, when the running backstays are deployed, the geometry of these running backstays typically requires that the running backstays be tacked whenever the boat is tacked.

Cutters generally make a less successful rig for coastal sailing. Typically, because of their offshore intent, cutters tend to have snug rigs that depend on larger Genoas for light air performance. Tacking these large Genoas through the narrow slot between the jibstay and forestay is a much harder operation than tacking a sloop. As a result many of today's cutters have a removable jibstay that can be rigged in heavier winds. This somewhat reduces the advantage of a cutter rig (i.e. having a permanently rigged and ready to fly small, heavy weather jib).

Cutters these days generally do not point as close to the wind as similar sized sloops. Because of the need to keep the slots of both headsails open enough to permit good airflow, the headsails on a cutter cannot be sheeted as tightly as the jib on a sloop without choking off the airflow in the slots. Since cutters are generally associated with the less efficient underbodies that are typical of offshore boats this is less of a problem that it might sound. Cutters also give away some performance on deep broad reaches and when heading downwind because the Genoa is sailing in the bad air downwind of the staysail, and they generally can only fly smaller spinnakers as well.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay

Last edited by Jeff_H; 12-09-2013 at 02:40 PM.
Jeff_H is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jeff_H For This Useful Post:
34crealock (12-09-2013), jweschman (10-19-2016), tspooner (12-09-2013)

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Masthead versus Fractional Cruisingdad Racing 29 11-12-2010 07:58 PM
Fractional Rig vs. Mast Head Rig c130king Sailboat Design and Construction 66 03-09-2008 11:38 AM
Fractional vs. Masthead Rig max-on Boat Review and Purchase Forum 7 06-14-2004 01:37 PM
masthead to fractional rig msl General Discussion (sailing related) 1 09-07-2003 07:41 PM
masthead v. fractional rig aasault Boat Review and Purchase Forum 1 10-05-2001 03:31 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome