First, I have no real world experience with the Loos gauge but understand from a paper I read that it was used to validate lab testing that was done on a test mast section. Using the Loos gauge they compared that data to an actual boat instead of using strain gauges on the boat. Before using the gauge for this they tested the gauge using a known tension and found it to be accurate enough for this use. So at least in my mind the gauge is suitable for its intended purpose. Instead of the Loos gauge I use the bowstring method and have found it adequate, simple and fast.
With the reliance on this gauge are you missing the more important variable. The actual tension in the wire doesn’t matter much but the mast must stay in column under sail. That is to say the individual wires will each have a different tension at the dock because of wire length, the geometry of the
rig and other factors even as it works together as a system and keeps the mast in column under sail. You need to adjust the
rig at the dock so that the mast is straight and centered in the boat with the proper amount of rake. Then sail the boat to adjust the tension so that the mast stays straight on each tack. I think you will find that the tension in the wires will be very different after tuning under sail then it was in your preliminary tuning dockside using any gauge.
Because the
rig needs this tweaking under sail I think the Loos gauge is unnecessary. You can just center and rake the
rig and pull the wire as you do with the string in a bow to get close enough before doing the final tuning under sail. I think it’s a mistake to equate safety in the
rig to an arbitrary preload in the wires. Instead you need to look at the mast under load and make sure it stays straight or in column. I know a gauge is easy to use and may put your mind at ease but it’s looking at something indirectly and not guaranteeing that the mast will be straight when you most need it to be. A safe
rig is a straight
rig.
All the best,
Robert Gainer