A curious photo of Shamrock - Page 2 - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 14 Old 03-19-2008
Thanks Courtney.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 3,954
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 13
After some on-line research I think that Shamrock III was the only one to have a white hull. I zooooooommmed way in on the transom and think that it is pretty likely a II or III. Since II was green in colour, I am lead to believe the photo is of Shamrock III.

hunter Legend 37 Semper Paratus
Formerly - Tartan 34C Yawl
T34C is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 14 Old 03-19-2008
Thanks Courtney.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 3,954
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 13
Story of Shamrock III dismasting here. Details would seem to match what is seen in picture.


hunter Legend 37 Semper Paratus
Formerly - Tartan 34C Yawl
T34C is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 14 Old 03-19-2008
Super Fuzzy Moderator
tdw's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 17,134
Thanks: 22
Thanked 128 Times in 119 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Originally Posted by TrueBlue View Post
My error - Tea.

Lipton Instant Soup came later - long after Sir Thomas's demise. He proably rolled over with his name associated to that invention.
Spinning like a top in fact.

Andrew B (Malö 39 Classic)

“Life is a trick, and you get one chance to learn it.”
― Terry Pratchett.
tdw is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 14 Old 03-19-2008
Owner, Green Bay Packers
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 14
Newer lighter materials may well fail in ways that older materials did not. Likewise, they may well not fail the way older materials did.

For example: Ships today are built of high tensile steel and are thus much stronger overall. Unlike boats, ships flex tremendously in a seaway. It's not at all unusual to see them flex a foot or more over their length. You have to position yourself in the proper position to even observe it. Fortuantely on cruise ships there really is no such viewing position! High tensile steel is phenomenal in this regard and, as a result, thinner plating can be used resulting in a large weight savings. A lighter ship equals more cargo capacity. The trade-off is that the thinner plating is, well, thinner. We punched a hole through the hull on a container ship I was in during docking in Baltimore. A fifty ton shackle on a quay-side fender was adrift and became exposed on the outer portion of the fender. 50,000 tons of ship moving at a 1/4 of a knot sideways did the rest. It was above the waterline in a fuel oil tank and, fortunately, above the level of fuel oil in the tank! A simple matter to inert the tank with CO2 and weld it up.

Likewise those ships are built to maintain speed in heavy weather. The ship's are stronger but the men are the same as always. Some of the ships will develop a sideways whipping motion. You can be standing on the bridge deck, or asleep in your bunk, and suddenly be either thrown five feet sideways or physically thrown out of your bunk! Young men's ship's those.

Advancements in materials and technology always come with trade-offs and are seldom used without stretching the limits of the advancement. I recall Robert Cumberford, an automobile designer, writing in opposition to aerodynamic improvements in auto body design. The ability to build a small, light weight car not dependant on massive amounts of horsepower to achieve very high speeds would result in many people killing themselves in cars that were not built for high speed nor were very crash-worthy. I'm sure you'll not find it too much of a stretch to imagine certain high performance sailboats that exhibit similar survivability issues when taken well offshore and forced to deal with the full fury of an inescapable sea.

“Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it.”
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.
sailaway21 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re-Packing A Stuffing Box - A New Photo DIY Article Maine Sail Gear & Maintenance 8 04-18-2007 02:29 PM
Can't Upload Photo S/VNirvana Announcements and Suggestions Box 1 04-15-2007 11:41 PM
Photo, Photo-Giu!! Cruisingdad General Discussion (sailing related) 8 03-03-2007 12:20 AM
A Cal 20 photo on a trailer? hammerguy@mindspring.com Cal 2 12-13-2006 07:06 PM
Very curious about expenses merc2dogs Living Aboard 12 10-17-2006 01:57 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome