
06-15-2008
|
 |
Last Grumpy Old Sailor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,593
Rep Power: 6
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btrayfors
The overwhelming number of false alerts that were traced were do to poor bracket design. The designs (across all U.S. manufacturers) of these brackets do not meet the established standards.
IMHO, the manufacturers should be held accountable, and required to design and produce a better bracket which meets the standards. They charge an arm and a leg for these relatively simple devices; they need to clean up their act.
|
Agree 100%. Couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the prices on these things.
It is an unfortunate reality, in today's world, that manufacturers will more likely produce things as cheaply as they can get away with, rather than as economically as they can and still do it right. The only way, it seems, to correct such problems is to fine and sue them into doing the right thing  .
Quote:
Originally Posted by btrayfors
Also, an educational campaign by the USCG, Auxiliaries, NOAA, BoatUS, and other large organizations on the storage, use, checking of EPIRBs would likely help avoid much user error. For example, few sailors putting EPIRBs in their ditch bags know that they must be kept dry, else they will activate inadvertently.
|
As with the manufacturers: Fine the transgressors for false alarms. Maybe they'll learn to RTFM.
I'm reminded to the annual "rescue the ice fishermen" exercises that go on around here. I think they fine those idiots, now. Which is as it should be, IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by btrayfors
EPIRBs save a lot of lives. We've got to be careful not to throw out the baby with the bath.
|
Doesn't sound like anybody's suggesting the system be abandoned, but that it be fixed.
Jim
__________________
s/v Abracadabra
1976 Pearson P30
Last edited by SEMIJim; 06-15-2008 at 10:34 AM.
Reason: Eliminated OT aside
|