Over reliance on electronics - Page 6 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related)
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree33Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #51  
Old 12-21-2012
MarkofSeaLife's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,980
Thanks: 25
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Rep Power: 4
MarkofSeaLife is on a distinguished road
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt.aaron View Post
I bet you are a better navigator then you let on. y.
I never said i couldnt navigate. I have just finished an intricate overnighter from Ft Lauderdale to Key West, 175 nms , outside the reefs but out of the gulf stream so was within 500 yards (meters) of the reefs for much of the time, including sleeping, arriving refreshed enough to go out on my night of arrival.
It was a passage that no person could do without electronices but completely safe no matter what (even if the combined Russian and USA satellites fell out of the sky) but never needing to take a baring of a light, nor needing to know what its names nor characteristics were.

Yes there were tricks to it and no i wouldnt recommend it to a learning ECN navigator and would never recommend it to a paper chartist.

Navigating can still be exciting without paper charts and a sex-whatever.

And i was stil able to toss in a few internet posts along the way.

As a nav exercise, and a short passage it was pretty damn good, if i say so myself.
But that doesnt mean I get complacent....

After doing a trans atlantic passage about 12 years ago charting only on paper i can tell you Nav can be easier, more exact, SAFER, and more enjoyable on ECN. Plus it gives you more time to ENJOY the passage.

And enjoyment is what cruising is all about on my boat.

__________________
Sea Life
Notes on a Circumnavigation:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #52  
Old 12-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,971
Thanks: 5
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Rep Power: 11
wind_magic has a spectacular aura about wind_magic has a spectacular aura about wind_magic has a spectacular aura about
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by chef2sail View Post
While I aree with the first couple of paragaphs, the Bowditch example is not really a good one. Theier last major change was 1995. hardly modern
I have the 2002 Bicentennial Edition
__________________
What are you pretending not to know ?

Please support my
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #53  
Old 12-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 392
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 7
noelex77 is on a distinguished road
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omatako View Post
Can't say I support that. Getting a fix on a GPS is easy, quick and generaly very reliable so to learn how to effectively do celestial nav in these times is, to me, a waste of time. If you have it and use it as a hobby and maaaaaybe in an emergency that's cool but starting now? No, I don't thinks so
Yes I do agree. I meant running fixes, DR etc. some people call this pilotage and some navigation.
I don't think cellestial is essential.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Omatako View Post
That level of redundancy is extremely rare on any boat - I'd be interested in what the 9 independent battery systems you have look like.
I am not sure it's rare these days, its hard to buy a phone without a GPS. For cruising sailors like myself our yacht is home so old computers etc accumulate. For the record between my wife and myself I have on board.
4 laptops.
2 iPads
2 phones with GPS.
2 handheld marine GPS units
2 fixed marine GPS units
2 older fixed marine GPS that still work.

My boat has 2 independent house banks plus an emergency battery mounted high up. So 3 house banks and a start bank which can be diverted to house bank. I also have a small 12v gel battery I use for testing and repairing equipment.

So that is actually 15 separate battery sources that could power a GPS and or maps. There are 10 GPS units on board.
I keep a couple of the units in a faraday cage.

So more than I thought now I have added it up. Some like the old laptop batteries are probably marginal, but the bottom line is there is lots of redundancy. This multiple level of redundancy is not necessary, but its what I have and it continues to increase as phone, computers and tablets are replaced with modern units.
MarkofSeaLife likes this.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #54  
Old 12-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milton, DE
Posts: 593
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 9
Flybyknight is on a distinguished road
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by capta View Post
And I suppose you were able to get at least 2 LOP's for a fix in 2 hours and have as good a position as when the GPS came back on?

Yes.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #55  
Old 12-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 113 Times in 101 Posts
Rep Power: 4
JonEisberg will become famous soon enough
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkofSeaLife View Post
I never said i couldnt navigate. I have just finished an intricate overnighter from Ft Lauderdale to Key West, 175 nms , outside the reefs but out of the gulf stream so was within 500 yards (meters) of the reefs for much of the time, including sleeping, arriving refreshed enough to go out on my night of arrival.

It was a passage that no person could do without electronices but completely safe no matter what...
That would be news to any of those navigators aboard SORC raceboats in the St. Pete-Lauderdale Race from 1961 onward, just to name a few...
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #56  
Old 12-21-2012
travlineasy's Avatar
Morgan 33 O.I. Perryville
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,235
Thanks: 3
Thanked 52 Times in 43 Posts
Rep Power: 4
travlineasy will become famous soon enough
Re: Over reliance on electronics

A couple days ago, I decided to head offshore and try to find some dolphin just outside the reef, east of Sombrero Key Light. When conditions are right, the Sargasso weed stacks up in large patches this time of year, and when you find a good size patch of Sargasso weed you will usually find lots of Mahi-Mahi lurking beneath it.

The trip wasn't far from Boot Key Harbor, just 9 miles. The first leg involved passing through Sister's Creek, which is fairly deep until you get to the mouth of the creek, where the bottom quickly comes up to 5 feet. That means I have about a foot of clearance if I'm in the right slot through the channel, which is very narrow. That depth is displayed on my GPS/Plotter and an alarm goes off when I enter the 5-foot zone.

Once outside the creek in Hawk Channel I have two options - proceed down Hawk Channel, or head out through the reef. Heading down Hawk Channel would add a couple miles to the distance, so I opted to go through the reef. Now, I'm one of those individuals that loves to sail through the reef. I love watching the beautiful underwater world unfold beneath the boat, I enjoy seeing big grouper and barracuda fleeing as I approach, and the schools of reef dwellers can be fascinating.

The depths on the GPS plotter, and the locations of the very shallow shoal areas were extremely accurate. When the chart-plotter revealed a 21-foot deep passage through the reef to the Atlantic's azure blue waters, the depth plotter's depth finder and bottom contour information was dead on. It also revealed a 4-foot deep patch of coral that was about 50-feet south of where I passed through the reef, and that's exactly where it was.

I guess my point here is that yes, this information is on the paper chart as well, however, the only visual reference point was Sombrero Light, which was about a mile away. The GPS/Plotter provided pinpoint accuracy, thus allowing safe passage through the reef. The passage area is about 150 feet wide, no one else was on the boat to sling a weight to test the depth, the waves were about 4-feet, thus the captain was glued to the helm in order to maintain course control. In this, and many other instances I've encountered in more than 6-decades on the water, that GPS/Plotter is far superior to paper charts. And, with the 20-MPH winds, that 3X4-foot chart would have blown overboard as soon as it was opened.

I guess from my perspective, particularly as a single-handed sailor, the advancements in electronic navigation are essential tools - not just fancy gadgets or toys. Over the years I've found them extremely accurate and reliable. In my case, I've only had a single GPS failure, which occurred shortly after a near miss lightning strike in Chesapeake Bay, and a Loran-C problem, which was interference during a thunder storm. In both instances, I had no problem finding my way home.

Almost forgot - I didn't find the dolphin, probably because the wind had broken up the organized patches of Sargasso weeds.

Cheers,

Gary
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #57  
Old 12-21-2012
PCP's Avatar
PCP PCP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal, West Coast
Posts: 16,160
Thanks: 21
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 10
PCP will become famous soon enough
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by travlineasy View Post
...
The depths on the GPS plotter, and the locations of the very shallow shoal areas were extremely accurate. When the chart-plotter revealed a 21-foot deep passage through the reef to the Atlantic's azure blue waters, the depth plotter's depth finder and bottom contour information was dead on. It also revealed a 4-foot deep patch of coral that was about 50-feet south of where I passed through the reef, and that's exactly where it was.

...
Most of the time is accurate but you have to know that sometimes isn't and if you have a over confidence on that accuracy you can get in real trouble. It had happened to me several times, not to be in trouble, but the accuracy being very poor, not to say misleading.

That has nothing to do with the GPS accuracy but with the charts that served as support for the information on the map in your plotter. The earth is not flat and the chart makers used different projection systems to make them flat. A good plotter has on the menu a choice of about 20 different projection systems used to make maps, to permit an adjustment between GPS position and the position marked on the map.

Many just don't know about this, other used cheap plotters that only have the most common reference system and even the ones that have god marine plotters will find that sometimes the system used for making the map is not available on the plotter. Those at least will know that in that region they will get inevitable errors, some with hundreds meters differences. And I am not talking just about exotic places, that happens for instance in Croatia that is one of the most common sailing destinations.

Believe me, many don't know about this. The guys on the Croatian charter company did not know nothing about it or that the plotter they had in the boats had the wrong setting or even that their plotter had a menu with different settings for different map systems.

Regards

Paulo
chef2sail likes this.

Last edited by PCP; 12-21-2012 at 03:19 PM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #58  
Old 12-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 392
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 7
noelex77 is on a distinguished road
Re: Over reliance on electronics

It's rare to see anything other than WGS84 these days. Even with the right datum, however, the maps are still often wrong.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #59  
Old 12-21-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 113 Times in 101 Posts
Rep Power: 4
JonEisberg will become famous soon enough
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by travlineasy View Post
The depths on the GPS plotter, and the locations of the very shallow shoal areas were extremely accurate. When the chart-plotter revealed a 21-foot deep passage through the reef to the Atlantic's azure blue waters, the depth plotter's depth finder and bottom contour information was dead on. It also revealed a 4-foot deep patch of coral that was about 50-feet south of where I passed through the reef, and that's exactly where it was.

I guess my point here is that yes, this information is on the paper chart as well, however, the only visual reference point was Sombrero Light, which was about a mile away. The GPS/Plotter provided pinpoint accuracy, thus allowing safe passage through the reef. The passage area is about 150 feet wide, no one else was on the boat to sling a weight to test the depth, the waves were about 4-feet, thus the captain was glued to the helm in order to maintain course control. In this, and many other instances I've encountered in more than 6-decades on the water, that GPS/Plotter is far superior to paper charts. And, with the 20-MPH winds, that 3X4-foot chart would have blown overboard as soon as it was opened.
Would you consider doing that same passage, for the first time, at night?

That would be an example of what I would consider to be "over-reliance"...
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #60  
Old 12-21-2012
travlineasy's Avatar
Morgan 33 O.I. Perryville
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,235
Thanks: 3
Thanked 52 Times in 43 Posts
Rep Power: 4
travlineasy will become famous soon enough
Re: Over reliance on electronics

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonEisberg View Post
Would you consider doing that same passage, for the first time, at night?

That would be an example of what I would consider to be "over-reliance"...
After going through the first time, during full daylight, yes, I would make the same passage at night, but keep in mind I would follow my daytime trail that is recorded on the GPS/Plotter. I may be old and somewhat crazy, but after more than a half-century on the water I didn't suddenly become stupid. Now, it it was an emergency, at night, I would make the passage through the reef solely on my GPS/Plotter. Granted, it would be somewhat risky, but not nearly as risky of doing the same passage at night relying solely on paper charts. In that instance, the odds are squarely in favor of the electronics. Essentially, the same chart is on my GPS/Plotter, but with the GPS I know exactly where I am on that chart at all times.

Cheers,

Gary
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mounting nav desk electronics janders Gear & Maintenance 16 03-05-2009 11:30 AM
Electronics show warns fear* of change could hobble industry (The Manila Times) NewsReader News Feeds 0 01-09-2007 10:15 AM
Electronics Box overhead atennaro@optonline.net Gear & Maintenance 0 02-24-2006 10:09 AM
Marine Electronics For Dummies Bluesmoods General Discussion (sailing related) 4 04-09-2003 03:19 PM
Marine Electronics For Dummies Bluesmoods Gear & Maintenance 1 04-07-2003 11:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.