hazards of GPS chart plotters - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 20 Old 02-28-2010 Thread Starter
overdue at Sans Souci
 
Diva27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midland Ontario
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
hazards of GPS chart plotters

The Cruising Yacht Club of Australia has just released its inquiry into the deaths of two sailors (including owner-skipper Andrew Short) in a catastrophic grounding during the Flinders Islet race last October. The inquiry is a crucial exposure of the hazards of relying on GPS chart plotters for safe navigation. I've posted at greater length on my cruising blog (SWEETWATER CRUISING Great Lakes wilderness cruising Recreational boating on Georgian Bay • North Channel • Lake Huron • Michigan UP • Lake Superior • and more) about the inquiry, with a link to the report, but the main takeaway points are that this maxi managed to run smack into Flinders Islet in the night despite having two GPS chart plotters. The owner-skipper was navigating almost exclusively by plotter, and as the inquiry outlined, GPS is prone to position degradation linked to the particular configuration of the satellite constellation. A the time of the grounding, there was an estimated degradation of at least 100 meters. The inquiry is critical of the growing trend of sailors relying exclusively on chart plotters, which can have other problems related to internal software. An eye-opener of an inquiry.

"Diva"
C&C 27 Mk 1
Midland Bay Sailing Club

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


It is better to be vaguely correct than specifically wrong.
Diva27 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
Telstar 28
 
sailingdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 14
         
I'd point out that you really shouldn't rely solely on any one navigation tool, especially in bad weather or at night. This is particularly true if you've previously noticed a serious error in navigation information being provided by a particular instrument or instruments as was the case of the maxi-yacht in your article in question.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

StillDON'T READ THAT POST AGAIN.
sailingdog is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
ASA and PSIA Instructor
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,565
Thanks: 7
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
Rep Power: 16
 
The big problem with the chart plotters is you can get a coruse/distance to a mark without seeing the territory that course will take you across, typically you are only looking at the destination mark.

You should never navigate by GPS, use the GPS only as a refernce to support/confirm your paper chart plotting.

Certified...in several regards...
sailingfool is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
Senior Member
 
sarafinadh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
curious,

this was at night, and in weather.. what other system could they have used...? that would have been less vulnerable to error...

sounds like there should have been a light house type marker...

sara

ain't what ya do, it's the way that ya do it...
sarafinadh is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
MC1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lake Ontario
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I've given a lot of thought to the problem of out-of-date and/or inaccurate charts used in chartplotters, but had not thought much about position degradation since, perhaps we're spoiled here in the US with WAAS capability. What is the status with respect to WAAS-like capabilities in that part of the world?

A quote from the Garmin web site:

"You've heard the term WAAS, seen it on packaging and ads for Garmin products, and maybe even know it stands for Wide Area Augmentation System. Okay, so what the heck is it? Basically, it's a system of satellites and ground stations that provide GPS signal corrections, giving you even better position accuracy. How much better? Try an average of up to five times better. A WAAS-capable receiver can give you a position accuracy of better than three meters 95 percent of the time. And you don't have to purchase additional receiving equipment or pay service fees to utilize WAAS."
MC1 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 20 Old 02-28-2010 Thread Starter
overdue at Sans Souci
 
Diva27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midland Ontario
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarafinadh View Post
curious,

this was at night, and in weather.. what other system could they have used...? that would have been less vulnerable to error...

sounds like there should have been a light house type marker...
One thing the inquiry criticized about the deceased owner-skipper was that the evidence indicated he was navigating entirely by chart plotter, and had no one on alert at the bow or on the rail to keep a lookout. He seems to have thought he was overstanding the island when he altered course and ran right into it. It was only when a crewmember detected surf that they went to panic stations. Whether or not a lighthouse would have helped, I don't know.
I've also heard from a sailor I know in Texas who told me there was a guy a couple years ago who went aground on Nekker Island by plotting waypoints and then letting his autohelm take over.
Wish I could answer the other query about WAAS in Australia. The main point, as others have pointed out, is not to blindly rely only on a GPS plotter and to do your navigating old school: have paper charts on hand, get out the binos, and keep a lookout. Even with WAAS, a GPS unit can have internal system errors. I'm disappointed the manufacturer in question declined to cooperate with the inquiry. They probably felt the standard disclaimer when you start up the plotter was enough.

"Diva"
C&C 27 Mk 1
Midland Bay Sailing Club

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


It is better to be vaguely correct than specifically wrong.
Diva27 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 536
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I have seen problems with these on my boat. I will plot in a rough course because were I actually sail will depend on whats there when I get there. Yet I've noticed other crew members (better sailors than me) follow the charted course coming way too close to stuff. At the same time they never tried to follow the course when it is drawn overland, LOL.

Ours often loses signal the GPS signal so it is easy for us to not fall into the trap of thinking it is right, though we do use the charts to determine markers and other information. I'd be pissed if the charts were wrong but then regular charts often are so you have to keep that in mind.

Have faith that the oceans are going to rise and flood the world, that plague and pestilence brought on by Climate Change is going to punish us for not believing. Please do as they say it is our only hope. :P
Architeuthis is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gloucester, MA
Posts: 586
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
I have run into several areas where the chart was accurate to itself but the coordinates were wrong. Two summers ago, we anchored in New Brunswick in dense fog using lookouts, radar, and depth sounder and the gps said that we were inland by over 1/4NM when we were actually a few hundred feet offshore in 30 feet of water.

My experience has been that charts produced recently are pretty good on the chartplotter but the older ones are sometimes shifted.
klem is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
Reward for lost Kraken!
 
hellosailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,481
Thanks: 5
Thanked 132 Times in 129 Posts
Rep Power: 11
   
" A the time of the grounding, there was an estimated degradation of at least 100 meters."
And what kind of GPS didn't throw up a red flag about the inaccuracy? A 2d/vs/3d indicator, or an EPE reading, something that should alert the user that there's a gross inaccuracy expectable?
I know I'd seen 1000 mile errors (literally) with LORAN-C, but I've never known a GPS to be that far off without some ability to let the user know about it. Or user error, like using DDMMSS versus DDdddddd formats.

MC1-
WAAS relies on a ground refernce station in a fixed known position, which reads the GPS signal, compares the position, and sends back the actual error information, IF your GPS can receive that information, and IF there's a WAAS ground station locally, your GPS then learns "Oh, there are atmospheric problems today, add a hundred feet north-northwest to whatever the satellites are telling you." WAAS augmentation is nowhere near universal.
hellosailor is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 20 Old 02-28-2010
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 8
 
"A WAAS-capable receiver can give you a position accuracy of better than three meters 95 percent of the time."

that means one time out of twenty it is worse than that. They dont say how much worse.
sck5 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All About Charts Jim Sexton Learning to Sail Articles 0 11-28-2004 07:00 PM
All About Charts Jim Sexton Seamanship Articles 0 11-28-2004 07:00 PM
GPS Gets More Accuracy Jim Sexton Seamanship Articles 0 05-21-2000 08:00 PM
GPS Gets More Accuracy Jim Sexton Gear and Maintenance Articles 0 05-21-2000 08:00 PM
GPS Gets More Accuracy Jim Sexton Cruising Articles 0 05-21-2000 08:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome