
08-31-2010
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 469
Rep Power: 3
|
|
|
I'll second what kd3pc said. Please don't give them any ideas. We don't need nor want any government entity trying to determine safety. It inevitably ends up strangling innovative designs (because they can't be proven safe unless used on a wide scale, which is a catch-22) and thus rewarding entrenched companies.
The biggest factor in whether or not a boat is built using safe techniques is the reputation of the company and the liability the company assumes for unsafe boats. A builder of quality boats is not going to want their reputation to be destroyed by a poorly built boat, so they will try very hard to continue building quality boats. They also don't want to have a massive recall or a lawsuit because of a failure in the boats. The market is self regulating in this respect. Think about this analogy: when you go to a restaurant, is your food safe to eat because the FDA dictates standards, or because it's bad business for the restaurant to make their customers sick?
The ABYC publishes safety standards for yachts that many manufacturers follow. Most marine surveyors will also compare a boat against these standards. They are completely voluntary standards, however, and thus you will find few boats that are fully compliant -- everybody finds some aspect of the standard unnecessarily burdensome or outdated due to a new design that didn't exist when the standard was written.
Also, there are a few very basic safety standards published by the USCG, such as requiring a bilge blower in gasoline powered boats and a few other such things. These are quite minimal.
Last edited by rmeador; 08-31-2010 at 03:05 PM.
|