Block and tackle breaking strength - SailNet Community
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,940
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 10

Block and tackle breaking strength

I'm interested in how reeving a line through blocks affects the whole system's breaking strength.

Suppose I have a line with breaking strength B and I produce a block and tackle with mechanical advantage A (i.e. pull A feet to move the moving part 1 foot).

To simplify things, for now, imagine the blocks and attachment points have infinite breaking strength and zero friction, and that the curve in the rope at all points (including knots and splices) does not decrease the breaking strength of the rope.

I would guess that in this idealized scenario, the breaking strength of the whole system is now A x B, since to achieve a tension of B in the line, I would have to load the moving part with a tension of A x B.

The first thing that doesn't feel right is that, at the points where the line turns around the block, the line has tension in opposite directions of equal magnitude, which should add up. Imagine a 2:1 purchase, rove to disadvantage. The moving part has two bits of line sticking out, straight up. If I put a weight W on the moving part, each bit of line supports W/2, which initially support the above reasoning for the breaking strength being A x B (since the line will break when W = 2 x B).

But the "two bits of line" are really just two ends of the same line being pulled away from another, each with tension W/2, so in between them, surely the tension is now W. At the very least, the block in the moving part is pressing down (across) the line with force W. So this seems to imply that the breaking strength is now just B again.

An important thing that I don't know how to account for here is how strong a line is when a force is applied transversely, rather than longitudinally. I would imagine it depends on how the line is assembled (single braid, double braid, three strand, etc.).

Finally, as an application: I put together a soft shackle last night from 3/6-in dyneema with a breaking strength of 5,400 lbs. The open shackle has the line doubled up, and the closed shackle is doubled up again, so it seems the breaking strength of the whole thing (by the original A x B argument) should be 21,600 lbs, minus whatever loss in strength is created by the knot, and assuming that all parts share the load equally.

Thoughts?

s/v Laelia - 1978 Pearson 365 ketch

Last edited by AdamLein; 01-29-2011 at 12:42 PM.

Old 01-29-2011
Two many boats!

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bowie MD
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8

Just kidding bout the cold but it did make my head hurt.

I love to sail, coming from a Swordboat capt's loin one would think I'd of caught the bug long before now! Oh well, this ones for you Bisque...(My Father may he RIP)

Now If I could only stay away from working on the damn things I could sail more!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Current boat...
-1985 c-30 TR DONE!! after two new engines and too much labor she floats sails and steams....
degreeoff is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,940
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 10

It made my head hurt thinking about it, too, so I decided to share the pain. I think it would be good to know the SWL of my various tackles, though I suspect that in many cases it will be greater than the SWL of the hardware attaching them to the boat :P

s/v Laelia - 1978 Pearson 365 ketch

Old 01-29-2011
Telstar 28

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 43,290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 16

Quite a bit depends on the line and the diameter of the sheaves, as well as the type of line it is and what it is made from. Some lines don't like being bent and if you bend them under a minimum radius, they will be severely damaged.

A lot also depends on how much friction is in the system. A large diameter block with higher friction will probably take more of a load than a small diameter block with very low friction sheaves, given all other things being equal.

Also, there are often other factors to consider. For instance, in a mainsheet setup, you don't only have to worry about the strength of the shackles, becket, sheaves and line, but also the strength and durability of the cam cleat that is used when the mainsheet is cleated off. The system is only as strong as its weakest link.

Sailingdog

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.

sailingdog is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,940
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 10

I don't know how to consider most of the other factors, so I'm looking at an idealized picture for now. As long as my basic understanding (A x B) is correct I suppose next I'd consider the effects of sheave diameter on the problem.

s/v Laelia - 1978 Pearson 365 ketch
Old 01-29-2011
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 170
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 10

In 50 years of sailing I've never had a block and tackle break!
With a 27 ft Catalina I doubt you will either.

I'd suggest you ponder more important stuff - like how come I have to pay \$38 for a bottle of rum in Alberta, but it's \$6.38 in the caribean?

sam :-)
Just because you're paranoid ...doesn't mean they're not after you!
Liquorice is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,940
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 10

Scoff. Mathematicians do not ponder "important stuff".

s/v Laelia - 1978 Pearson 365 ketch
Old 01-29-2011
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,304
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 34 Posts
Rep Power: 9

You do need to keep and eye on the bits and pieces

1970 Cal 29 Sea Fever

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1981 J24 Tangent 2930
Tommays
Northport NY

If a dirty bottom slows you down what do you think it does to your boat
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
tommays is offline
Old 01-29-2011
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: currently lying Papeete / TAHITI
Posts: 385
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 12

Grab a cappuccino.

The Block & Tackle will come with a certificate stating what load it is certified to safely use (SWL). The Breaking Load with be significantly higher. (Man Riding applications have a sfety factor of 8)

This information should also be stamped on the side of the cheek plates.

As long as the line is sized correctly, you will not have to worry about the line breaking under load. If the Breaking Load is exceeded, the Block & Tackle will fail before the line parts. Unless this is a 'shock' load, you will have plenty of warning before that happens.

Over simplifying it, every time the line passes over a set of pulley's, you will half the load. Hope I actually answered your question.
nemier is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,940
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by nemier View Post
Over simplifying it, every time the line passes over a set of pulley's, you will half the load.
Certainly that's not the case, since then mechanical advantage would always be a factor of two.

Anyway I guess it makes sense that blocks would be marked with their SWL or whatever, but I'm wondering what happens when I mix and match things and combine them in clever ways. For example, what do you think about the soft shackle problem? The original line's breaking strength was listed, but I'm trying to understand when, in this case, I double the line up twice.

s/v Laelia - 1978 Pearson 365 ketch

Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.

## Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
OR

## Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

 Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post sailak Gear & Maintenance 5 05-27-2009 11:14 PM bubb2 Seamanship & Navigation 4 07-02-2008 06:11 PM USCGRET1990 General Discussion (sailing related) 14 05-13-2007 08:00 PM goose327 Gear & Maintenance 42 04-13-2007 11:37 AM GC20Squid General Discussion (sailing related) 3 03-23-2006 09:31 PM

 Posting Rules You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OnTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules