Gun question - Page 11 - SailNet Community
 31Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #101 of 130 Old 02-28-2012 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
beej67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackdale View Post
From the fantail of the USS Bainbridge, not a Pearson 32.
And what were they shooting at?

beej67, Checkered Past, 1980 32' Pearson 323, Panama City FL
beej67 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #102 of 130 Old 02-28-2012
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 5
 
I also remember 30yrs ago you could tell your position in the Newport to Bermuda race by how many sets of plastisc Knife, forks,spoons & plates you came by after dinner time. I'm sure that dosen't happen any more.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
May you weather all storms
dorymate1 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #103 of 130 Old 02-28-2012
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Truckee, CA
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: 2
Thanked 116 Times in 114 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Last shot on the lead issue. My Dad & I used to cast our own 3 lb lead salmon sinkers, many, many hundreds of them, and who knows how many thousands of lead bullets in our garage. I don't know for sure how much lead smoke we breathed in but it was a lot.
Not sure what effect it has had on me but I will soon be 78, am upright and still know my name. No question lead is bad stuff, I guess it all depends on how much it gets into one's system. Doubtfull that some lead sinkers or bullets in the oceanwill make much difference?

Paul T
dabnis is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #104 of 130 Old 02-28-2012
Senior Member
 
weinie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 581
Thanks: 4
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
beej,

no matter what evidence and actual science you use to support your arguments, there are just some people you can never convince.
weinie is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #105 of 130 Old 02-29-2012
Senior Member
 
Geoff54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 725
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnewaska View Post
Lost lead fishing weights must keep you up at night.
Lost lead fishing weights don’t keep me up at night but the Fish and Wildlife Service, at several states and four countries have some kind of prohibition or limit on lead sinkers. At least two other states have “get the lead out” campaigns to encourage the use of alternatives. Yeah, I think that’s an issue too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnewaska View Post
Arguments always end in a stalemate here, no exceptions.
You are absolutely right but if it makes one person think about the implications…. When I was a teenager I used to wash my motorcycle parts and tip the greasy water down the storm drain. Until someone pointed it out, I never even considered where it ended up.

After these few post I'm done - I can only bang my head against a wall for so long.
Geoff54 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #106 of 130 Old 02-29-2012
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Truckee, CA
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: 2
Thanked 116 Times in 114 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff54 View Post
Lost lead fishing weights don’t keep me up at night but the Fish and Wildlife Service, at several states and four countries have some kind of prohibition or limit on lead sinkers. At least two other states have “get the lead out” campaigns to encourage the use of alternatives. Yeah, I think that’s an issue too.



You are absolutely right but if it makes one person think about the implications…. When I was a teenager I used to wash my motorcycle parts and tip the greasy water down the storm drain. Until someone pointed it out, I never even considered where it ended up.

After these few post I'm done - I can only bang my head against a wall for so long.
A search on lead sinkers showed a few states banning lead sinkers smaller that about 1/4 ounce. I guess their concern was that a small sinker might be ingested by birds, similar to lead shot.

Paul T
dabnis is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #107 of 130 Old 02-29-2012
Senior Member
 
Geoff54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 725
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
Link please, lets have a look at them.
As I believe you are just trying to be a ***** about this, I’m not going to waste my time to look it up. If I remember correctly, one was from Exeter, another was in Nature recently and there is at least one other. If you are really interested, which I doubt, you can do an academic search (You do know how to do that I assume). I’d start with PubMed or PubChem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
But one hundred thousandth of that, which is me shooting off my boat, will not.
Me, me, me. Got it! There no cumulative effect. Millions of pounds of lead don't matter.
Geoff54 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #108 of 130 Old 02-29-2012
the pointy end is the bow
 
erps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: La Conner, Washington
Posts: 6,264
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 11
   
Quote:
Lost lead fishing weights don’t keep me up at night but the Fish and Wildlife Service, at several states and four countries have some kind of prohibition or limit on lead sinkers. At least two other states have “get the lead out” campaigns to encourage the use of alternatives. Yeah, I think that’s an issue too.
to prevent waterfowl from eating it.

Ray
S.V. Nikko
1983 Fraser 41
La Conner, WA


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Boating for over 25 years, some of them successfully.
erps is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #109 of 130 Old 02-29-2012
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Truckee, CA
Posts: 8,867
Thanks: 2
Thanked 116 Times in 114 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
I've been fortunate enough to acquire a couple new firearms for Christmas, and don't have a great place to shoot them. I'd like to sail out into the gulf past the 12 mile limit and shoot beer bottles off a float. What sort of pesky rules and regulations might I run afoul of while doing so?
Looks like we may have drifted a bit from the original question. Aside from some possible local regulations, if you don't go out very far, the only thing I can think of is if you are shooting during waterfowl season the steel shot and shotguns only requirement may come into play. That is probably a huge stretch but if you are not too far out an overly eager law enforcement officer may want to see how far he can stretch the envelope.

Paul T
dabnis is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #110 of 130 Old 02-29-2012
Senior Member
 
Geoff54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 725
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
I'm really sort on time so let's hit the highlights.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
The truth is that lead poisoning is bad, but people quite often live to a ripe old age with a little lead exposure.
Yes people live with lead in them – doesn’t mean it’s not harmful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
The truth is that most lead exposure humans have nowadays isn't due to source lead, it's due to lead solder in pipes or lead pipes themselves between the source and the drinker.
Sorry but you are dead wrong there. Most lead exposure is from direct contact and subsequent ingestion – the biggest problem is still kids and lead dust, primarily from old paint but also from other sources.

...........
Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
But there's a major disconnect here. That's drinking water. I'm talking about clean water standards in the environment - big difference. I don't even need to have your argument about 'zero concentration is okay,' because I'm not trying to drink the ocean.

The truth about lead in surface waters, is that the Clean Water Act does a pretty damn good job of cleaning lead up where they've identified a problem, established a TMDL, and met that TMDL. If you can find an instance of acute lead poisoning that was from exposure to water in a creek that met or beat it's EPA established TMDL, you point me to it. Until then, we must presume that the TMDL program is working, when it comes to limiting environmental concentrations of lead. Where people have gotten sick from environmental exposure to lead in surface waters, has uniformly been where the creek didn't meet the TMDL.

Lead TMDLs vary by location and by water body use, but they're typically around 1 microgram per liter. So unless you have a better number you want to use as a baseline, we will use this. "Zero" is not a better number.

Lets skip the keel, and talk about my bullet, 300 feet deep, off the gulf coast of Florida. Lets do math about that bullet.

It's 2.6 grams.

That's 2,600,000 micrograms.

If I were to somehow completely dissolve that bullet into water, I would need 2,600,000 liters of water in which to dissolve it to meet a typical concentration limit for a "clean" surface stream.

That's 91,819 cubic feet of water. Sounds like a lot of water, right? In fact, that's a rectangular column of water 17.5 feet by 17.5 feet, 300 feet tall. If I were somehow to dissolve my bullet on impact, and distribute that liquid bullet to the bottom of the ocean where I shot it, I would have to move 17.5 feet down the coast before I shot another bullet, to meet clean surface water standards. Doesn't seem that hard.

But of course the bullet dissolving on impact would be the "worst case" scenario, which clearly isn't happening Instead, the bullet itself will dissolve from the pH of the ocean, over the course of perhaps decades or centuries. So lets figure out how slow we need the bullet to dissolve for the safety of the environment.

Well .. the rotational current of the Gulf is about 1.5 miles per hour. In truth this current is much slower at the bottom due to boundary layer mechanics that I'm skipping because it just muddles the issue. Instead we'll say that the "plume" from this bullet is approximately one square foot wide by the time boundary conditions no longer affect it's velocity. Now lets pretend it's totally laminar, no molecular diffusion or turbulent effects, and the plume stays exactly 1 foot square, off to infinity.

1.5 mph = 2.2 ft/sec

at 1 foot square, that's a volume of 2.2 cf passing over the bullet per second.

at that rate of advection of the plume, we'd meet clean water standards if the bullet dissolved in half a day.

How long do you really think it's going to take the bullet to dissolve? I would figure maybe 50 years? In 50 years, 3.5 billion cubic feet of water have passed over this bullet, and the lead concentration of the plume due to the bullet is three thousanths of a percent of the allowable limit.
Nice smoke screen. Any idiot can do a little superficial math based on dubious assumptions


Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
Now, lead is clearly a problem if the animals in the food chain actually eat the lead pellets. This is a problem for birds, who are silly creatures who eat rocks to help their digestion, and who eat things pellet sized. Are there food-chain fish who eat rocks the size of .22 bullets?
Bullets fragment and lead leaches and does get into the food chain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
.. the idea that the bullet will dissolve into water and harm the environment is just plain dumb. It's the sort of thing that brings all of environmentalism down, because smart people can tell it's dumb, and when environmentalists make dumb statements then they taint the whole movement. And I'm an environmentalist. Stop tainting my movement.
So why did you come up with this dumb idea – if you read my posts, I didn’t. You label yourself an environmentalist, which I doubt and which is just a label you apply to yourself anyway. I wouldn’t want to risk stepping in your movement, there’s already enough pollution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beej67 View Post
So! Why don't I go to a gun range? Unfortunately, the economy sucks, and while Wall Street got a bailout, Civil Engineers got a steaming pile of crap shoved down our throats, so I've got a little bit of free time to argue with people over the internet. And shoot guns. Off boats.
So you are an out of work engineer. Sorry to hear that. Absolutely nothing wrong with that of course, a lot of people are hurting right now. The problem is that you represented yourself as “ president of his own engineering consulting company”, presumably to pump yourself up and sound important. Not sure if it was to give credence to your argument or ….? Maybe you did a bit of self-employed work and incorporated for tax or liability reasons, which could technically make you president of a corporation. But claiming that you are the president of his own engineering consulting company is a bit disingenuous, don’t you think?

Bottom line:
Lead is bad for you.
While one bullet might be insignificant by itself, the vast quantity of lead from bullets is not.
Once in the environment, it stays there. (While there are ways to bind lead to other substances so that it isn’t retained in a body, that doesn’t happen in nature).
Lead can fragment and leech its way into the food chain.
Once in the food chain it tends to rise to the top.
The effects of lead ingestion aren’t always obvious.
Did I mention that lead is bad?

BTW, we never even touched on lead in primer

I'm done - feel free to have the last word. As I said, people tend to do what ever they want and then come up with ways to justify it.
Geoff54 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple question, but still a question:keel repair eckcn17 Gear & Maintenance 9 03-16-2011 11:01 AM
The $64,000.00 question Maverick1958 Cruising & Liveaboard Forum 12 02-01-2010 11:47 AM
c&c 30 mki a,b,c,etc.. question Csobanc Boat Review and Purchase Forum 1 01-28-2010 08:11 PM
Keel/ballast Question?? Plus Extra Credit Question ;) stephenronning General Discussion (sailing related) 2 03-20-2009 07:25 AM
question spazomatic General Discussion (sailing related) 9 09-06-2007 10:33 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome