EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related)
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Minnewaska
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-13-2012
SOUNDBOUNDER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island Sound
Posts: 747
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
SOUNDBOUNDER is on a distinguished road
EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved Marrone Bio Innovations' dry formulation of Zequanox, a biological product for controlling invasive mussels within enclosed systems and infrastructures, the company said.

“Zequanox is the first biopesticide available for controlling invasive zebra and quagga mussels, which are crippling industrial and commercial operations by restricting water flow in heat exchangers, condensers, fire suppression systems, and service and cooling water systems, as well as by damaging other infrastructure and equipment,” Marrone Bio Innovations said in a statement.


EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 03-13-2012
kd3pc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Callao, VA
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 8
kd3pc is on a distinguished road
Re: EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

perhaps a good thing, depending on how and when it is used...but more likely given the expertise of the EPA, it will be more like Corexit and other "dispersants" and enzymes....they have approved over the years...only to find out that the cure is worse than the disease..

time will tell
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 03-13-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Narragansett Bay
Posts: 8,960
Thanks: 10
Thanked 135 Times in 121 Posts
Rep Power: 6
Minnewaska will become famous soon enough Minnewaska will become famous soon enough
Re: EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

I wonder how it's administered? Do they dump a billion gallons in the Hudson River in Albany, or must all the muscles report somewhere to be inoculated?
skygazer likes this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Jeanneau 54DS

In the harsh marine environment, something is always in need of repair. Margaritas fix everything.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 03-13-2012
blt2ski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,694
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 10
blt2ski will become famous soon enough
Re: EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

Please note, it says "ENCLOSED SYSTEMS" meaning, some freigters that have water in a holding tank as ballast so it sits low enough, can put this chemical in those tank to kill any mussels etc in the tank so they can then discharge the tanks closer to shore, in the GL's etc such that they will not spread invasive creatures in those area's.

I do not see where it says they cab broadcast the chemical/pesticide if you will somewhere in a river/lake etc to kill the intended target. BUT, it could have an x day/week/month residual, which in the end, could cause issues as DDT, Dursban/Diazanon etc have thru the years.

Marty
__________________
She drives me boat,
I drives me dinghy!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 03-13-2012
Faster's Avatar
Just another Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 14,694
Thanks: 68
Thanked 196 Times in 188 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about
Re: EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

We have a power plant that uses sea water for it's turbine condensers.. they have had horrible problems with zebra mussels - they love the warm environs of the condenser tubes. To date they heavily chlorinate the intake water to kill the mussels, and then must pH neutralize the water with SO2 prior to discharging.. both nasty chemicals to handle, and bad items to spill or lose to the environment uncontrolled....

If this product is affordable AND effective it may be a good alternative all around.
__________________
Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 03-13-2012
travlineasy's Avatar
Morgan 33 O.I. Perryville
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,303
Thanks: 3
Thanked 59 Times in 49 Posts
Rep Power: 4
travlineasy will become famous soon enough
Re: EPA approves product for controlling invasive mussels

Faster,

Are you sure the problem is with zebra mussels, and not some other type of mussel? Zebra mussels, such as those now found in the Great Lakes, cannot tolerate the ocean salinity level, thus, those that have washed down the Susquehanna River to Chesapeake Bay have never survived. However, there are some other forms of mussels that are similar in nature that tolerate higher salinity.

The bigger problem with any of this is the remedy is often far worse, environmentally, than the problem. For example, in the Chesapeake's upper reaches the power plant at Carroll Island once had a huge problem with entrainment of aquatic vegetation, sea worms, crabs and finfish, creatures sucked into their heat exchanger. The area in front of the plant, mainly the channel leading to the intakes, was treated with copper sulfate during the mid 1960s to kill off the grass, which also eliminated the habitat for the worms, crabs, finfish, etc... It worked. Every blade of grass from that area quickly died. Additionally, the massive volume of water pumped through the power plant circulated into the nearby waters of the Seneca River, Gunpowder River, Dundee Creek, Saltpeter Creek, and other smaller bay tributaries. The grasses died there as well. It took nearly 40 years for the grass to make a minor comeback in these areas, and some areas near the power plant have never experienced a resurgence. And, the more fragile, native species of aquatic vegetation, wild celery and eel grass, have never returned.

The smarter thing in this instance would have been to locate the power plant inland a few miles, a location where some of the water flowing down the Gunpowder River could have easily been diverted through the power plant's heat exchangers. At the time, the plant was a coal-fired facility that had the coal transported by rail to the facility. Later, when the plant converted to oil, it was transported to the facility by barge. The oil could have been transported from the Baltimore terminal by pipeline just as easily and at far lower cost.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I've never really understood the mentality of locating a power-plant along the shores of a bay or ocean, especially in an area where there are dozens of fast flowing rivers nearby that could do a far more efficient job.

Cheers,

Gary
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MA High Court Approves Wind Farm Deal SOUNDBOUNDER General Discussion (sailing related) 0 01-03-2012 09:09 AM
Hiring / Controlling a Contractor TAK Gear & Maintenance 15 10-03-2009 02:58 PM
Controlling the Spinnaker Dan Dickison Racing Articles 0 11-09-2000 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.