PORTA POTTI - A 'no no' or 'okay' for cruising? - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related)
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree14Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-29-2012
Future liveaboard
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wisconsin/Lake Michigan
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SailMonkey is on a distinguished road
PORTA POTTI - A 'no no' or 'okay' for cruising?

So we're about to take the boat for spin. Hopefully a lengthy one. Cruising to the Gulf of Mex. then onto Bahamas, Caribbean, who knows...

We have a 33' Morgan OI, and the normal holding tank, head, etc. has been removed and we have used a porta potti type head. We've had zero issues with emptying at marinas, etc, cruising the Great Lakes.

We're wondering if this will be an issue elsewhere...other countries, other cruising grounds. Legal or otherwise. Anyone know??

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 05-29-2012
Barquito's Avatar
Barquito
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,073
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Rep Power: 8
Barquito is on a distinguished road
Re: PORTA POTTI - A 'no no' or 'okay' for cruising?

I would imagine it could be a bit of a PITA to have to empty more often than a holding tank. Might limit how long you can be away from civilization. Don't know about legal requirements.
__________________
Bristol 27
Cirque
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 05-29-2012
Future liveaboard
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wisconsin/Lake Michigan
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SailMonkey is on a distinguished road
Re: PORTA POTTI - A 'no no' or 'okay' for cruising?

I was thinking it might be good to buy second one, or a just the holding tank, and use it as a backup when the first is full.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 05-29-2012
PorFin's Avatar
Señor Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 8
PorFin is on a distinguished road
Re: PORTA POTTI - A 'no no' or 'okay' for cruising?

Possible? Yeah, no doubt.

Practical? Probably much less so.

I think you're wise to research this before you depart. Take a lot of time to check marinas at which you can dump your PortaPotty, then do a time/distance analysis to make sure you won't be stuck with a full tank with a couple of days to go before you can use your head.

When we came south from Lake Michigan, we didn't avoid marinas but also didn't spend every night in one. There are stretches (sometimes several days worth) when you just can't make the math work, and will have to anchor out. Weather delays should be factored in. Don't assume that every marina will be able to accept your waste. We also had a couple of nights when there were no available berths at marinas we had intended to visit. You should have a back-up plan for offloading your PortaPotty if you are forced to do so from anchor.

If it were me, I'd strongly consider biting the bullet and installing a proper head. YMMV.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 05-29-2012
DrB DrB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 966
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 8
DrB will become famous soon enough
Haven't used a PortaPot in a few years, but

...The other factor to think of is the stink factor. Even if you don't fill it up every day, I would think you would need to empty it on very regular basis else it will a nice bouquet de pungence, especially in a warmer regions. Like I said, haven't used one in awhile, so they (new models) maybe less prone to stink than I remember.

I agree with others, if you are going to go the P-to-P route, at lease get a secondary, collapsible holding tank/bladder for back-up.

DrB
__________________
If you liked my advice/response, give me some rep points. If you didn't......well what do you expect, it was free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 05-29-2012
Future liveaboard
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wisconsin/Lake Michigan
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
SailMonkey is on a distinguished road
Re: Haven't used a PortaPot in a few years, but

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrB View Post
...The other factor to think of is the stink factor. Even if you don't fill it up every day, I would think you would need to empty it on very regular basis else it will a nice bouquet de pungence, especially in a warmer regions. Like I said, haven't used one in awhile, so they (new models) maybe less prone to stink than I remember.
DrB
What seems to be the key to having no 'stink' is to not use it for urine at all. That's what ends up stinking. We've followed that advice and used the enzyme additive that's recommended, and have had no smell issue.

I'm more concerned with any legal problems, customs, etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 05-29-2012
casey1999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HI
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 11
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
Rep Power: 5
casey1999 is on a distinguished road
Re: PORTA POTTI - A 'no no' or 'okay' for cruising?

I have read of some areas where you must have a head with a holding tank to be legal. These are primarily marine reserve areas. The concern would be with no holding tank you may fill up the pota poti and be inclined to dump it in the water (although same could happen with a holding tank).

In hawaii there are areas where it is illegal to anchor unless you have a installed head with a Coast Guard approved holding tank- although this regualtion does not seem to be strickly inforced.

Agree with others, do some research, and the strictly regulated marine reserves and conservation area could be a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 05-29-2012
PorFin's Avatar
Señor Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Rep Power: 8
PorFin is on a distinguished road
Re: Haven't used a PortaPot in a few years, but

Quote:
Originally Posted by SailMonkey View Post
What seems to be the key to having no 'stink' is to not use it for urine at all. That's what ends up stinking. We've followed that advice and used the enzyme additive that's recommended, and have had no smell issue.

I'm more concerned with any legal problems, customs, etc...
Well, you're now facing a problem. Legally, you can piss off the rail -- no worries (other than perhaps offending passing sailors or risking a citation for indecent exposure which could land you on a sex offender's registry.) However, once it goes into any type of container is becomes wastewater, which cannot be legally dumped. Idiotic? You betcha. A frequently violated rule? I'd bet my life on it.
SailMonkey likes this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 05-29-2012
tdw's Avatar
tdw tdw is online now
Super Fuzzy Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 14,932
Thanks: 5
Thanked 80 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 10
tdw is a jewel in the rough tdw is a jewel in the rough tdw is a jewel in the rough
Re: Haven't used a PortaPot in a few years, but

Quote:
Originally Posted by PorFin View Post
Well, you're now facing a problem. Legally, you can piss off the rail -- no worries (other than perhaps offending passing sailors or risking a citation for indecent exposure which could land you on a sex offender's registry.) However, once it goes into any type of container is becomes wastewater, which cannot be legally dumped. Idiotic? You betcha. A frequently violated rule? I'd bet my life on it.

as someone once said to me "how can they outlaw a bucket ?" ...

Much of the effluent rules do not make sense but it is , or was, a problem that had to be dealt with. Personally I see no problem with direct discharge in less crowded anchorages but in a marina I can see the need for regulations.

Casey, you questions legality but wouldn't a Porta Potty qualify as a holding tank ? It certainly does down here cos on one of our previous boats we kept one on board in case our then direct discharge head was ever questioned.
__________________
Andrew B

"Do you think God gets stoned? I think so... Look at the platypus." Robin Williams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 05-29-2012
casey1999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HI
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 11
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
Rep Power: 5
casey1999 is on a distinguished road
Re: Haven't used a PortaPot in a few years, but

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdw View Post
as someone once said to me "how can they outlaw a bucket ?" ...

Much of the effluent rules do not make sense but it is , or was, a problem that had to be dealt with. Personally I see no problem with direct discharge in less crowded anchorages but in a marina I can see the need for regulations.

Casey, you questions legality but wouldn't a Porta Potty qualify as a holding tank ? It certainly does down here cos on one of our previous boats we kept one on board in case our then direct discharge head was ever questioned.
Sorry, we got too many lawyers in the US:

USCG Systems Engineering Division (CG-ENG-3)

Your direct discharge head is illegal in the US and you can get fined heftly. My understanding even if you lock your heads seacock shut it is still illegal in the US (US Coast Guard states a permantently installed head must meet their regs).. If you are a foreign boat passing through I think you'll be ok.

This is from the above Coast Guard link:
"Portable toilets.
Vessels having no installed toilet are not subject to the provisions of Section 312 of the Act. Portable toilets or porta-potties that use no installed water, power, etc., are not considered installed toilets and therefore not subject to the requirements in 33 CFR Part 159. However, regulations still exist to prohibit disposal of raw sewage within U.S. territorial waters, the Great Lakes, and navigable rivers. Use of portable toilets in combination with a direct discharge toilet is not permitted. Vessel owners may elect to remove installed toilets and use instead portable toilets. For vessels having a portable toilet, all non-compliant fixed toilets should be removed unless impractical or unsafe in which case such devices should be rendered permanently inoperable. For inspected vessels using portable systems, use only devices manufactured of a durable material, such as molded plastic, aluminum, etc., to facilitate removal ashore, securely fastened to the vessel using straps, wooden framing, or similar materials, and maintained by the vessel operator following the manufacturers instructions as to waste disposal, chemical additives, etc. "


Actually there are some (but not all) porta poties that are Coast Guard approved type III msd.
http://www.wholesalemarine.com/c/330...e+Toilets.html
SailMonkey likes this.

Last edited by casey1999; 05-29-2012 at 07:20 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chaninging from Porta-Potti to pump out cb32863 Gear & Maintenance 13 06-01-2012 03:58 AM
Porta Bote lancelot9898 Gear & Maintenance 8 03-03-2009 03:42 AM
Block Island, RI & a porta potti kwf05001 Cruising & Liveaboard Forum 11 04-24-2008 03:17 PM
Head or porta-pottie? Jotun Boat Review and Purchase Forum 12 11-29-2006 06:34 PM
porta potties? jbarros Gear & Maintenance 6 01-02-2003 07:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.