Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating? - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related)
 Not a Member? 


Like Tree3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 09-06-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,777
Thanks: 0
Thanked 135 Times in 119 Posts
Rep Power: 4
JonEisberg will become famous soon enough
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supern0va View Post
Is there really no database where you enter a boat model and it spits out a rating? It seems so logical that this info should be available...
Far better to try to educate yourself, and make your own decision...

Start with reading DESIRABLE AND UNDESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFSHORE YACHTS...

Then, perhaps Steve Killing's YACHT DESIGN EXPLAINED...

John Neal's website is a good source online to begin:

Mahina Expedition - Selecting A Boat for Offshore Cruising

The Ballad looks like a good little boat, Albins have a reputation for being pretty stout boats, though she will exhibit some of the less than desirable characteristics of an IOR design... Not necessarily a deal-breaker, however...

Funky looking rudders on the Ballad, though... I'd want to know the specs on the rudder stock, I wouldn't count on obtaining too much support from such a high aspect skeg...

HDChopper likes this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #12  
Old 09-06-2012
VK540's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Blind River Ontario, Canada
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 4
VK540 is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supern0va View Post
Ah, yes that is somethign along the lines of what I had in mind. Thanks.

However this is all data derived from ship dimensions that can be found online.
I suppose a CE rating is not only based on this but also on things like hull thickness, strength of the rigging, the way the chainplates are mounted and all sorts of other build quality related stuff that I don't know the proper English terms for
Is there really no database where you enter a boat model and it spits out a rating? It seems so logical that this info should be available...
If your in the market for a used boat you may want to forget the CE rating anyway. It started in Europe, it hasn't been used for all that long and even though some North American manufactures state their boats meet CE rating they are not certified anyway due to this being a European rating and the cost associated with getting them certified. You are correct that all hardware, portholes, LP gas fittings and so on are part of the rating but one upgrade or repair on a used boat renders this useless (if a less standard part is used) and our electrical and gas regulations are different then European regulations causing more complications. Good luck in your search and if you do find what your looking for ensure to post the link for the rest of us!
__________________
"BLISS II"
1977 38 foot C&C Mark 1
Hull #92
Sailing the North Channel of Lake Huron
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #13  
Old 09-06-2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milton, DE
Posts: 593
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 9
Flybyknight is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Here are some serious boat comparisons.
Look at Capsize ratio, Motion Comfort, Displacement to Water Line Length,
etc. and that should address your concerns.
Dick

Sail Calculator Pro v3.53 - 2500+ boats
jimjazzdad likes this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #14  
Old 09-06-2012
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,599
Thanks: 5
Thanked 96 Times in 72 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flybyknight View Post
Here are some serious boat comparisons.
Look at Capsize ratio, Motion Comfort, Displacement to Water Line Length,
etc. and that should address your concerns.
Dick

Sail Calculator Pro v3.53 - 2500+ boats
Of course, in and of themselves, the Capsize ratio, Motion Comfort, Displacement to Water Line Length tell you next to nothing about the actual likelihood of capsize, motion comfort or seaworthiness of the vessel in question and can be dangerously misleading.

Jeff
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay and part-time purveyor of marine supplies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #15  
Old 09-07-2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Supern0va is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by VK540 View Post
It started in Europe (...)
By now I've taken the effort to set my country of residence to the Netherlands on my sailnet profile

Anyhow, thanks for all your replies. I'll take in to account capsize / comfort ratio as an extra parameter, separate from a CE rating.

Unfortunately the best of the three second hand Ballads that are for sale in the NL has just been sold... Oh, well. I'll be on the lookout
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #16  
Old 09-07-2012
jimjazzdad's Avatar
Bluenoser
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Margaret's Bay
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 7
jimjazzdad is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

I second Dick's recommendation of Sail Calc. Pro - a very useful tool for comparing boat designs. However, it takes no account of the builder's practices. Having owned an Albin Vega and having worked on a friend's Ballad, I can attest that Albin boats are VERY well built. I believe the Ballad was more of a racing design (IOR 1/2 ton?) and may not be as suitable a bluewater boat as some of the others in the Albin line. The Nimbus is a nice cruiser, though perhaps larger and more $$$ than you want.

If you are in Holland, there should be lots of great steel boats for sale, no?

Last edited by jimjazzdad; 09-07-2012 at 06:58 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #17  
Old 09-07-2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Supern0va is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjazzdad View Post
However, it takes no account of the builder's practices.
Yes. And that is exactly the thing I wanted to know these CE ratings for, since those do take into account the builder's practices.

As for the steel boats, I'm sure there are plenty but I'd rather stick with polyester. Mostly based on prejudice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #18  
Old 09-07-2012
jimjazzdad's Avatar
Bluenoser
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Margaret's Bay
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 7
jimjazzdad is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supern0va View Post
Yes. And that is exactly the thing I wanted to know Ihese CE ratings for, since those do take into account the builder's practices.

As for the steel boats, I'm sure there are plenty but I'd rather stick with polyester. Mostly based on prejudice
I think that the structural integrity of a professionally built steel boat will always be greater than that of an equivalent design in polyester (though maintenance may be an issue). YMMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #19  
Old 09-07-2012
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,599
Thanks: 5
Thanked 96 Times in 72 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

Dick (FlyByKnight) asked me to explain my reasoning behind my statement "in and of themselves, the Capsize ratio, Motion Comfort, Displacement to Water Line Length tell you next to nothing about the actual likelihood of capsize, motion comfort or seaworthiness of the vessel in question and can be dangerously misleading." I appologize that this was written by me for an earlier discussion on this topic but it exxplains the basis of my comment.

"This topic comes up a lot. Its seems that as soon as someone posts a question about the seaworthiness of some particular boat, that a well meaning responder sends them to Carl's Sail Calculator to look at the Capsize Screen Formula and the Motion Comfort Index. But as I have explained many times in the past, (and I am about to explain yet again) these surrogate formulas tell almost nothing about how the reality of a boat's likelihood of capsize or its motion comfort. In fact they provide so little indication of a boat's behavior that to rely on them borders on the dangerous.

"To explain, both of these formulas were developed at a time when boats were a lot more similar to each other than they are today. These formulas have limited utility in comparing boats other than those which are very similar in weight and buoyancy distribution to each other. Neither formula contains almost any of the real factors that control motion comfort, the likelihood of capsize, or seaworthiness. Neither formula contains such factors as the vertical center of gravity or buoyancy, neither contains weight or buoyancy distribution (of the hull both below and above the waterline), the extent to which the beam of the boat is carried fore and aft, and neither contains any data on dampening, all of which really are the major factors that control motion comfort or the likelihood of capsize.

"I typically give this example to explain just how useless and dangerously misleading these formulas can be. If we had two boats that were virtually identical except that one had a 500 pound weight at the top of the mast. (Yes, I know that no one would install a 500 lb weight at the top of the mast.) The boat with the weight up its mast would appear to be less prone to capsize under the capsize screen formula, and would appear to be more comfortable under the Motion Comfort ratio. Nothing would be further than the truth.

And while this example would clearly appear to be so extreme as to be worthy of dismissal, in reality, if you had two boats, one with a very heavy interior, shoal draft, its beam carried towards the ends of the boat near the deck line, a heavy deck and cabin, perhaps with traditional teak decks and bulwarks, a very heavy rig, heavy deck hardware, a hard bottomed dingy stored on its cabin top, and the resultant comparatively small ballast ratio made up of low density ballast. And if we compare that to a boat that is lighter overall, but it has a deep draft keel, with a higher ballast ratio, the bulk of the ballast carried in a bulb, its maximum beam carried to a single point in the deck so that there was less deck area near the maximum beam, a lighter weight hull, deck and interior as well as a lighter, but taller rig, it would be easy to see that the second boat would potentially have less of a likelihood of being capsized, and it is likely that the second boat would roll and pitch through a smaller angle, and would probably have better dampening and so roll and pitch at a similar rate to the heavier boat, in other words offer a better motion comfort....And yet, under the Capsize Screen Formula and the Motion Comfort Index it would appear that the first boat would be less prone to capsize and have a better motion when obviously this would not be the case.

There are some better indicators of a vessel’s likelihood of capsize. The EU developed their own stability index called STIX, a series of formulas which considered a wide range of factors and provides a reasonable sense of how a boat might perform in extreme conditions. Unfortunately meaningful results require a lot more information than most folks have access to for any specific design. The Offshore Committee of US Sailing developed the following simplified formula for estimating the Angle of Vanishing Stability (Sometimes referred to as the ‘AVS’, ‘limit of positive stability’, ‘LPS’, or ‘Latent Stability Angle’ ):
Screening Stability Value ( SSV ) = ( Beam 2 ) / ( BR * HD * DV 1/3 )
Where;
BR: Ballast Ratio ( Keel Weight / Total Weight )
HD: Hull Draft
DV: The Displacement Volume in cubic meters. DV is entered as pounds of displacement on the webpage and converted to cubic meters by the formula:
Displacement Volume in Cubic Meters = ( Weight in Pounds / 64 )*0.0283168
The Beam and Hull Draft in this formula are in meters. These values are entered in feet on the webpage and are converted to meters before SSV calculation.
Angle of Vanishing Stability approximately equals 110 + ( 400 / (SSV-10) )

There is a convenient calculator at http://www.sailingusa.info/formula.htm

It should be noted that the AVS is only one indicator in evaluating the likelihood of capsize, meaning it only predicts the point at which the vessel wants to turn turtle. It does not predict the amount of force that would be required to heel the vessel to that limit, nor does it predict how the shape of the boat might encourage wave action to roll the boat closer to the angle at which it no longer wants to return.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay and part-time purveyor of marine supplies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #20  
Old 09-07-2012
boatpoker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,054
Thanks: 8
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Rep Power: 7
boatpoker is on a distinguished road
Re: Seaworthiness - Lloyd register rating?

No one can determine if a vessel is "seaworthy" other than for a specific voyage at a specific point in time .......................

NAVIGATION ACT 1912 - SECT 207
Definition of seaworthy
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a ship is to be treated as seaworthy under this Act if, and only if:

(a) it is in a fit state as to the condition of hull and equipment, boilers and machinery, the stowage of ballast or cargo, the number and qualifications of crew including officers, and in every other respect, to:

(i) encounter the ordinary perils of the voyage then entered upon; and

(ii) not pose a threat to the environment; and

(b) it is not overloaded.


the ship is, for the purposes of this Act, to be treated as meeting the condition in subparagraph (1)(a)(i) in relation to that voyage so far as that condition relates to the condition of the ship and its equipment unless the condition of the ship or of its equipment does not correspond substantially with the particulars of that certificate or of any of those certificates.
__________________
Dirt People Scare me

Last edited by boatpoker; 09-07-2012 at 12:41 PM. Reason: deletion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seaworthiness tlarndt Chrysler 11 06-07-2013 03:32 PM
ISAF Sailing World Cup : Delta Lloyd Regatta 2012 NewsReader News Feeds 0 03-17-2012 11:50 PM
Henri Lloyd Backs Top Sailing Events in 2011 NewsReader News Feeds 0 07-13-2011 11:10 PM
Age and Seaworthiness? BubbleheadMd Seamanship & Navigation 27 01-06-2010 07:24 AM
The Sand Hole, Lloyd Neck, Long Island AngusScott Cruising & Liveaboard Forum 10 12-16-2008 08:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.