Stability information - Page 2 - SailNet Community
 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 15 Old 10-07-2012 Thread Starter
Life is a wild ride!
 
Dean101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 409
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Stability information

Quote:
Originally Posted by SloopJonB View Post
There's a design book called "Seaworthiness - The Forgotten Factor" by Marchaj that came out in the wake of the IOR stability games. I haven't read it but I've seen it highly recommended by authoritative voices. Perhaps it has what you're looking for.
Thanks! I'll check that out. In the meantime, I'm hoping the Google fairy will turn something up!
Dean101 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 15 Old 10-07-2012
grumpy old man
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,128
Thanks: 1
Thanked 96 Times in 92 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Stability information

Right. The simple capsize ratio is a bit too simplistic to give you any meaningful data. It's good for a quick look and if you did get a number under 2.00 then it might be worthwhile to investigate the stability issue further.

I'm not sure I understand this. If you are using a method that tells you the AVS for an Alberg 35 is above 150 degrees I'd throw that method out. I could be wrong but it seems too high to me. JonB is correct, that could be called the "garboard radius" although it's not a radius in most cases and it changes at each station. In a case where there are hollow garboards and you need to determine a "hull depth" it's going to be tricky. The way I would do it on paper is to draw a straight line tangent to and from the section to the centerline ignoring the garboards, i.e. pretending the keel is not there. But any simplistic approach to determining stability is going to be suspect.

If you contacted US Sailing I am certain they would have accurate stability data for the Alberg.

But why bother? The Alberg will have a high AVS. My guess would be around 138.17 degrees. That's a good number and there is nothing about that design the indicates it would have stability issues. Just look at it. Also keep in mind that critical to any stability study is the VCG. Without an accurate VCG the rest of the equasion is not going to give you an accurate number. If you have found a method that ignores an accurate VCG input then I would call it very suspect.

I'll bet you a dollar that when Carl Alberg designed the 35 he did not do a stability study. I'm sure he drew a shape that he knew was right and in line with other healthy designs of the day. It turns out that he was right and the 35 is a very good boat.

Stability is complicated to most sailors. I think a little understanding of how the elements work can be dangerous. I also think that way too much emphasis is placed on hard stability numbers. AVS numbers only tell a small, static part of the dynamics involved in a capsize. The rest is pretty hard to calculate. If you own a "normal" boat and not some radical design freak or extreme racing boat then your biggest assett in rough conditions will be your own ability to manage the boat in a seamanlike manner. I can't find the formula for that.

Look at Rod Johnstone's exhaustive study on actual, documented capsizes. His results were very interesting. In plotting numbers for the various cases he found that the boats with the best numbers were more prone to capsize. What does that say? Nothing to me. Too many variables to draw any conclusions as far as I am concerned.

I have this image of a couple on their boat in a storm. They get knocked down to 130 degrees. The husband turns to the terrified wife and says, "No worries dear. This boat is good till 132 degrees." I have been in the middle of the Pacific in a taiphoon. I have seen waves that would capsize any boat regardless of the numbers. In all the studies one thing becomes evident, the bigger the boat, the more resistant it is to being capsized.

Hope that helps.
dacap06 likes this.

Please visit my blog. It's fun to read.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Bob's Blog ....

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Please also visit my new web site
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
bobperry is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 15 Old 10-07-2012
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MS Gulf Coast
Posts: 711
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Re: Stability information

A couple links to info from Ted Brewer that may help:
Good Old Boat - Is your boat stable? article
and
Ted Brewer Yacht Design
seabreeze_97 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 15 Old 10-07-2012
Barquito
 
Barquito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: Stability information

I'm not ready to be looking for world circling boats. However, if I where shopping, I would just generally look for boats that are seaworthy. After that, there would be other factors that would effect my final choice such as the interior layout, sailing characteristics, equipment included in the sale... I just think I would use a broader brush in evaluating boats.

Bristol 27
Cirque
Barquito is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #15 of 15 Old 10-08-2012 Thread Starter
Life is a wild ride!
 
Dean101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 409
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Stability information

Barquito, one of your statements struck the root from which my curiosity springs. "If I where shopping, I would just generally look for boats that are seaworthy." But as a fairly inexperienced sailor, how do I know what is seaworthy? I don't think it would be smart on my part if I take the word of every seller. Sure, some might be telling the truth but how will I know if they are?

I get the feeling that seaworthiness is not a well-defined term. I read a lot of books and cruise through these forums looking for sound advice. The "offshore rules of thumb" (my term) stating that offshore boats should have capsize ratio's under 2.0, AVS of at least 140 degrees, ratings for offshore use, designed for offshore use, choose a seaworthy boat... well, those things sound reasonable. The only one of these things I can consistantly find on about every boat I've looked at is the capsize ratio, which doesn't seem to carry much weight. Finding AVS information and what any given older boat is designed or rated for is like looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack, and without some offshore experience on different boat designs how am I, the newbie, suppose to know what seaworthy is?

That's the view from my perspective. I don't have the money to buy, try, and then sell several boats till I figure it out. I'm trying to get a grip on what really makes a boat safe for offshore use so that when I get ready to buy, I'll know what to look for. I already know that the boat I buy will be from the used market, likely a few decades old. I know what I want to do with it. I'm simply trying to find a source for stability information on various older boats to help myself make an educated compromise when it comes time to buy.

@ Bob - I was using an online calculator. When I input the numbers, all of which were the same except the hull draft, I got greatly different numbers which taught me that even a small error in my input will return untrustworthy results. Me actually trying to calculate AVS by formula, even with totally accurate data, is laughable in the extreme! But seriously, your response comes from much knowledge and experience in your field. I respect that, but I do not have anything even close to your knowledge of how any given design will behave offshore. AVS information, if I can find a reliable and consistant source, for older boats will be one more thing I can put on a pro/con list for different boats I'm interested in. That, in turn, will paint a more accurate picture of each boat rather than focusing on just the "pretty" things.

I was a little long-winded there but I hope it helps to explain why I was asking about AVS.
Dean101 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stability simplified E32Strider Sailboat Design and Construction 3 07-17-2009 08:56 PM
Caliber 28 Stability GRKnebel Boat Review and Purchase Forum 4 03-14-2004 09:34 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome