Hard vs Soft - SailNet Community
 3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 31 Old 11-19-2012 Thread Starter
Grumpy Cat
 
PAULCR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kemah, TX
Posts: 72
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Hard vs Soft

I know everyone has one but I would still like to hear opinions on inflatable vs. hard dinghies. We are trying to decide and would like to hear pro/cons from folks that know.
Thanks in advance for any input.
PAULCR1 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Senior Member
 
jackdale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 9,041
Thanks: 27
Thanked 59 Times in 56 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: Hard vs Soft

Hard dinghies
Pros
easier to row
less expensive
do not deflate

Cons
harder to stow
can bang against hull

Inflatables (RIB)
Pros
can be easier to stow
do not bang against hull

Cons
harder to row
difficult to repair
souljour2000 likes this.

__________________
ISPA Yachtmaster Offshore Instructor Evaluator
Sail Canada Advanced Cruising Instructor
IYT Yachtmaster Coastal Instructor
ASA 201, 203, 204, 205, 206, 214
As I sail, I praise God, and care not. (Luke Foxe)
jackdale is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 109
Thanked 316 Times in 302 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Hard vs Soft

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackdale View Post
Hard dinghies
Pros
easier to row
less expensive
do not deflate

Cons
harder to stow
can bang against hull

Inflatables (RIB)
Pros
can be easier to stow
do not bang against hull

Cons
harder to row
difficult to repair
Nice summary.. and I agree.. have had both, liked the row-ability of a hard dinghy, and their oyster/rock/barnacle proof nature. Didn't like the hassle of fending them off alongside overnight, though eventually found that pipe insulation along the gunwales worked well...

Have sliced an inflatable open on an oyster shell.. not fun and rather inconvenient, but carrying capacity and quiet wins out IMO, esp if you're doing a lot of ferrying ashore. Small motor is pretty much a necessity, though.

We use a small roll up inflatible with 3 hp engine when we have guests, otherwise mainly use a couple of plastic kayaks.

Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 31 Old 11-19-2012 Thread Starter
Grumpy Cat
 
PAULCR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kemah, TX
Posts: 72
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Re: Hard vs Soft

Thanks for the replies. Food for thought that I will munch on for a while.
PAULCR1 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
tdw
Super Fuzzy Moderator
 
tdw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 16,622
Thanks: 15
Thanked 107 Times in 100 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Hard vs Soft

I'm not absolutely convinced about inflatables being easier to stow. A decent sized one is big, bulky and surprisingly heavy. While they'll stow in a cockpit locker getting the bloody thing in and out is a damnable nuisance, to such an extent that we now leave ours permanently stowed on deck presumably meaning that one of these days it is bound to get nicked. A smallish (say 8') non inflatable stows quite easily on deck and to some extent is less of a nuisance than an inflatable. Smaller than 8' and solid dinghys lose their rowing qualities.

Smaller boats than say 40' will have problems stowing the hard dink up front but then they also tend to have less capacious cockpit lockers. Its no good thinking about stowing a hard dink aft of the main mast cos you then lose your vang.

Andrew B

“Life is a trick, and you get one chance to learn it.”
― Terry Pratchett, Nation

Malo 39 Classic

Last edited by tdw; 11-19-2012 at 05:34 PM.
tdw is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Senior Member
 
chucklesR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pasadena Md - Magothy side
Posts: 5,979
Thanks: 10
Thanked 31 Times in 31 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Hard vs Soft

Porta-botes bridge the gap, stowable, lighter, rowable and resistant to damage.

on the other hand they are ugly.

All boats are compromises
Here7ico likes this.

Lessons learned are opportunities earned.
chucklesR is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Barquito
 
Barquito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Barquito is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 16,552
Thanks: 109
Thanked 316 Times in 302 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Hard vs Soft

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucklesR View Post
Porta-botes bridge the gap, stowable, lighter, rowable and resistant to damage.

on the other hand they are ugly.

All boats are compromises
A recent story, this past summer.. One of our club members had bought a portabote over the winter, and was very happy with it.. rowed alright, stable, stowable etc etc. On the July long weekend they were departing for a little jaunt to a nearby beach in company with a few other dinghies. One of the RIBs accelerated past the portabote a bit too close, I suppose, and before anyone knew it the portabote was upside down, two people and a dog in the water. No warning, not a big wave really, just a bad catch..

However the swimmer still owns it, so I guess he's still OK with it. SNer erps has been using the portabote for quite some time and seems satisfied too..

Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Senior Member
 
bristol299bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oriental NC
Posts: 242
Thanks: 41
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Hard vs Soft

It's all about compromises and what works for you. For me I wanted a good rowing dinghy that was lightweight. I bought a used nesting dinghy so i can tow it or store it (nested) on deck behind the mast. It rows beautifully, and I'm happy not to have to deal with an outboard and carrying gasoline on board.

The downside is that it's a pram style and its flattish bow can be noisy (slapping) at anchor.
bristol299bob is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 31 Old 11-19-2012
Senior Member
 
chef2sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 7,096
Thanks: 30
Thanked 58 Times in 54 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Send a message via AIM to chef2sail
Re: Hard vs Soft

Quote:
I'm not absolutely convinced about inflatables being easier to stow. A decent sized one is big, bulky and surprisingly heavy. While they'll stow in a cockpit locker getting the bloody thing in and out is a damnable nuisance, to such an extent that we now leave ours permanently stowed on deck presumably meaning that one of these days it is bound to get nicked-TDW
We stow ours on the foredeck when not on davits. It has a full Sunbreela cover the Admiral made with elastic hem while in the davits or on the deck fully inflated. We also have a smaller one for when it is stored deflated. Takes a minute to cover All this so it doesnt get nicked or catch the UV Rays

Dave


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
___________________________
S/V Haleakala (Hawaiian for" House of the Sun")
C&C 35 MKIII Hull # 76
Parkville, Maryland
(photos by Joe McCary)
Charter member of the Chesapeake Lion posse

Our blog-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


“Sailing is just the bottom line, like adding up the score in bridge. My real interest is in the tremendous game of life.”- Dennis Conner
chef2sail is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Soft versus hard shackles Zanshin Gear & Maintenance 12 06-05-2011 03:27 AM
hard dodger vs. soft ktuthill General Discussion (sailing related) 15 10-01-2009 12:31 PM
hard dodger vs soft dodger bluetommy77 Boat Review and Purchase Forum 6 10-07-2007 06:29 PM
hard dodger vs soft heidi-peter Gear & Maintenance 4 02-05-2003 08:02 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome