Ericson 29...2 hours... - Page 2 - SailNet Community
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 14 Old 11-23-2012
Senior Member
souljour2000's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 619
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
Re: Ericson 29...2 hours...

10 years is probably a good rule of thumb...I'd say most boat rigging lasts that long generally with average might still inspect everything and determine that it's all okay for another couple years but know what to look for...the smaller the boat and rigging then I would say minus a couple years but I think salt and pollution in environment is biggest factors and age is about as important but not more so than those factors...frequency of use in heavy conditions/saltwater and care and maintenance are also big factors of course...

Last edited by souljour2000; 11-23-2012 at 03:44 PM.
souljour2000 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 14 Old 11-23-2012
Senior Moment Member
SloopJonB's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 13,025
Thanks: 90
Thanked 114 Times in 109 Posts
Rep Power: 6
Re: Ericson 29...2 hours...

Depends where you are as well. In northern climes 10 years is not particularly old but in Florida etc. 10 years is old.

I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
SloopJonB is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 14 Old 11-23-2012
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Durham N.H.
Posts: 525
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 9
Re: Ericson 29...2 hours...

You HAVE to check into great friendly and informative group . . .I have an ericson 27, love it. They have an excellent build quality and reputation, the 27's have an encapsulated keel (no keel bolts to worry about) I think the 29 is the same . . .where are you located? My boat is in Allen harbor . . other side of bay from Newport
mikel1 is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 14 Old 12-04-2012
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 0
Re: Ericson 29...2 hours...

Another Ericson 27 owner here, a 1974 vintage. The 29 you reference is a sweet boat for that price. These boats are tough and well made with big bluewater trips still being made under those maintenance free, encapsulated keels.

In the smaller sizes, the Ericson is much like a top of the line Buick. Not a rocket in standard trim, but plenty of power for the highway, comfortable, spacious for the size, easy to operate and maintain, and a great value. The 29 would be an excellent first boat that will take you as far as the skipper can be prepared to go.

some of the less finer points I've discovered.

* The hull shape isn't optimal for DDW sailing. you will want to become proficient with poling out the genoa and sailing wing and wing, or live with a broad reach.

* Preventers are easy to rig and inexpensive. With the fin keel and spade rudder the boat can be twitchy and crash gybing is a real possibility. preventers are an inexpensive, highly functional upgrade.

* You may find the boat to be tender in moderate breeze, however, it will stiffen as the blow comes on. These boats are in their element in heavier air.

* 70's era masthead sloops have their drawbacks, and being designed for huge genoas is one of them. The main is embarrassingly small. Often one does not need to take a reef, but is more advised to be ready to change out the headsail for changing conditions. For breeze 20kts and up you need a working blade jib. Some people go for an 85% with a high clew, others have opted to run a 98~100% blade and fit a short run of tracks close to the cabin house to get a proper sheeting angle. Otherwise, just run a 135% with a reef or two and live with a close reach.

* likely the boat will be rigged with wire to rope halyards. new all rope halyards will require the mast to come down and new sheaves to be fit at the masthead. this is a great idea, anyway. at the same time you may want to upgrade the in-mast wires, windex, and potentially place your antenna up high. these boats are very simply rigged - new standing rigging should be part of your early plan, not considered optional.

* for heavy air I advise retrofitting the the split backstay with a backstay tensioner to tame the genoa and keep some tension on the forestay. These are relatively inexpensive and commonplace for any split backstay boat.

* the 27 and 29 both have a considerable amount of freeboard that can make for tricky docking in the breeze. out on the water I haven't found the tall sides to be an issue, but rather an asset: a dry cockpit. this is readily apparent to J/24 crew, soaked out of their minds and making fun of your Buick until they see that you're not in foulies and are comfortably sipping cappuccino with only one hand on the tiller.

* performance: a lot of people complain about these boats being slow, but the real issue seems to be mismatched expectations between a a 70's era, IOR influenced boat with masthead sails compared to newer ULDB boats and fractional rigs. Having said that, remember that Buick also made the Grand National. On any old boat, new sails and more modern deck layout is the key upgrade.

good luck with whatever you decide. The 32 mkII would be a great step up from the 27 or 29 for both more space and performance. If you like the layout of the 29 and think you want more speed and a newer boat, I encourage you to consider the 28+ and the 30+ which are fractionally rigged and have deeper keels to boost performance. They are both sweet rides compared to the 70's era modesty of the 27 and 29.

I also encourage you to visit the fine folks at the Ericson owners site as previously suggested. They're a great bunch of folks with a great deal of experience with racing and cruising.


s/v Skol
Berkeley, CA
HDChopper and groggy like this.

Last edited by Skol; 12-04-2012 at 05:25 PM. Reason: grammar
Skol is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How many amp hours can I fit? labatt Gear & Maintenance 42 04-13-2009 09:51 PM
Logging Hours mrwuffles General Discussion (sailing related) 6 02-23-2009 05:00 PM
Understanding Amp Hours maddata Gear & Maintenance 10 06-20-2007 06:53 PM
Westerbeke 4-108: How many hours are too many? LWinters Gear & Maintenance 14 01-28-2007 02:36 PM
Hours on a Diesel Helimech Boat Review and Purchase Forum 2 08-01-2005 06:44 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome