EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel! - Page 2 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related)
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 01-31-2013
TropicCat's Avatar
Senior Pirate
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Posts: 2,429
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 7
TropicCat is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

that study (the study) measures wear in ppm on a ball bearing which is moved on a track about a million times for each additive. The bearing is then put in an electron microscope and wear measured. There is a huge difference between brands of additives and the best ones if used in a marine diesel would reduce wear on injectors and injectorpumps / fuelpumps by quite a bit over raw low sulfur fuel. Interesting that regular old 2-Cycle TC-W3 Engine Oil, used as an additive did pretty darn good in this test!!
__________________
Tropic Cat

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by TropicCat; 01-31-2013 at 10:20 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #12  
Old 01-31-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 665
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 6
lancelot9898 is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

That test is from 6 years ago and the results did not show many additives that are popular today. I've been using startron diesel additive(star brite) and was hoping that it was somehow included. Others not included were Hammonds, Gold Eagle, ValvTect..

It was interesting that the Marvel Mystery Oil had a negative effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #13  
Old 01-31-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 2
Thanked 38 Times in 38 Posts
Rep Power: 4
MarkSF is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MedSailor View Post


I was talking with a marine diesel mechanic and he told me that they've now taken almost all the surfur out of marine diesel. I knew that the on-road stuff was low sulfur now but I thought us (off-road) boaters were still polluting. Apparently not!

He told me that since diesel fuel is the primary lubricant for the high pressure fuel pump and parts of the injectors that those are the parts wearing out rapidly now. He said that Seattle Injector has had to hire more staff to deal with the increased demand of suddenly worn out $3000 injector pumps.

His recommendation was to add a lubricant additive to the fuel. He likes the biobor brand but says many other brands work.

Read more here:
Locomotive, marine and non-road diesel fuel standards begin at later dates. - Clean Diesel Fuel Alliance

MedSailor
The ASTM 975 lubricity specification for #2 diesel fuel has been in place since 2006, and the ultra-low sulphur fuels must meet it. So there has been NO change in the lubricity spec that fuels must meet. If ULSD can lubricate the 25,000 PSI fuel pump in my 2013 TDI, I'm sure it can lubricate the 30-year old technology fuel pump in my Universal.

The failures I think have been of seals that were in a poor state anyway, and ULSD sends them over the edge.

Just because some guy at the marina says it's true, doesn't make it true.
__________________
1984 Bristol 31.1
Alameda, California, USA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #14  
Old 01-31-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 17
Thanked 70 Times in 67 Posts
Rep Power: 8
miatapaul is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkSF View Post
The ASTM 975 lubricity specification for #2 diesel fuel has been in place since 2006, and the ultra-low sulphur fuels must meet it. So there has been NO change in the lubricity spec that fuels must meet. If ULSD can lubricate the 25,000 PSI fuel pump in my 2013 TDI, I'm sure it can lubricate the 30-year old technology fuel pump in my Universal.

The failures I think have been of seals that were in a poor state anyway, and ULSD sends them over the edge.

Just because some guy at the marina says it's true, doesn't make it true.
I agree, it is likely the age of the seals, and the ULSD pushes them over the edge, but if you can avoid the failure a few years or more, then it is cheap insurance given how little fuel the average sailboat uses. I was surprised at Stanadyne's results were so low, I wonder how there current formula would be if there has been any change. I know that is one of the top additives for the modern VW crowd. I hope to pick up a new TDI whenever the new Golf 7 comes to the US, or I may get a Jetta Sport-wagon or Golf 6. I was not impressed with the new Passat or Jetta.

I also wonder about availability of the top rated additives from that study. Keep in mind the marine environment has other things to be concerned about other than just lubrication. (High levels of H2O and other contaminates) You are also likely better off finding the best source of fuel before even worrying about additives. I know a lot of Marine supplies are suspect to begin with. With my previous diesels I have religiously used truck stops to make sure I got high quality fresh fuel, but you cant do that with a sailboat unless you use jerry cans.

Last edited by miatapaul; 01-31-2013 at 12:48 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #15  
Old 01-31-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 2
Thanked 38 Times in 38 Posts
Rep Power: 4
MarkSF is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

When I fill the Passat up (which is about every 3 weeks... the result of 50mpg on the highway) I just fill the 5 gallon jerry for the boat. That about covers my sailing use. This way I get fresh diesel.

I had the Jetta 6 (2010) and now the 2013 Passat TDI. They are very similar to drive, the main difference being a much softer ride in the Passat, more room, and more soundproofing.
__________________
1984 Bristol 31.1
Alameda, California, USA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #16  
Old 01-31-2013
Alex W's Avatar
no longer reading SailNet
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 2
Thanked 139 Times in 133 Posts
Rep Power: 2
Alex W is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

It's off topic, but every new version of the TDI drives worse than the last. We've owned 1998 Jetta, 2000 Golf, 2002 Jetta Wagon, 2006 Jetta and I've driven many others (up to the 2010 Sportwagen TDI). The 2000 Golf was the best handling of the bunch. My wife's 2006 Jetta is comfortable, but I think it handles pretty poorly.

5 gallons of diesel on a sailboat per month seems like a lot, you must get to enjoy a lot of time on the boat. I mostly use the engine to get in and out of my marina (~10 minutes at a time) and it can take me 6 months to go through 5 gallons of fuel. It's long enough that I don't remember if Shilshole still sells 20% biodiesel or not (which has great lubricity, but don't use it in VW TDIs newer than 2006).
__________________
I'm no longer participating on SailNet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #17  
Old 01-31-2013
TropicCat's Avatar
Senior Pirate
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Posts: 2,429
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 7
TropicCat is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkSF View Post
....If ULSD can lubricate the 25,000 PSI fuel pump in my 2013 TDI, I'm sure it can lubricate the 30-year old technology fuel pump in my Universal.
Not quite the same thing though, is it? Your 2013 engine was designed for Ultra low sulfur fuel, and our older diesels were not. This is the entire point.

Read the test. If guys who drive a diesel 1,000,000 miles swear this is the bible, are you better qualified to disagree with them?

And please refrain from shooting the messenger.
__________________
Tropic Cat

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by TropicCat; 01-31-2013 at 03:04 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #18  
Old 01-31-2013
casey1999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HI
Posts: 2,905
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
Rep Power: 5
casey1999 is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

I was just reading my Yanmar engine manual. One thing it said was sulfur in diesel fuel can mix with any water in the fuel (and all fuel probably has some water mixed in, even if you have a fuel water separator) and create sulfuric acid which will attack your fuel pump and injection valves. So it seems no sulfur in the fuel is a good think, as long as additives are there to get the lubricity up.

I do add a lubricant and algacide to the fuel, just in case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #19  
Old 01-31-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 2
Thanked 38 Times in 38 Posts
Rep Power: 4
MarkSF is on a distinguished road
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicCat View Post
Not quite the same thing though, is it? Your 2013 engine was designed for Ultra low sulfur fuel, and our older diesels were not. This is the entire point.

Read the test. If guys who drive a diesel 1,000,000 miles swear this is the bible, are you better qualified to disagree with them?

And please refrain from shooting the messenger.
Right above there's a post from a guy who runs a trucking company, and hasn't seen any change in fuel pump failures.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that low lubricity is bad, or that ULSD has lower lubricity than old high sulphur fuel. The question is, is ULSD that meets the ASTM spec SUFFICIENTLY lubricitous? And if so, how often does it not meet spec, and why?

The question in that test you quote, is how come the baseline fuel failed the wear spec it should have met? Was it contaminated or poorly made?

An interesting fact is that, since VW introduced the latest TDI engine in 2009, and had some problems with fuel pump failures, VW have taken to testing the fuel in every car that suffers a failure, and makes a warranty claim - and are finding gasoline contamination in the diesel, every single time.

So it seems possible that fuel pump failures are at least sometimes, and probably most of the time, due to contamination of diesel with gasoline (or marvel mystery oil!)

So the best action you can take is to make sure you get fuel from a reputable supplier.
__________________
1984 Bristol 31.1
Alameda, California, USA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #20  
Old 01-31-2013
chucklesR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pasadena Md - Magothy side
Posts: 5,978
Thanks: 10
Thanked 31 Times in 31 Posts
Rep Power: 10
chucklesR is a jewel in the rough chucklesR is a jewel in the rough chucklesR is a jewel in the rough
Re: EEK! They've taken the sulfur out of Marine Diesel!

TropicCat, the study is a 2007 study but does not mention ASTM 975 - are we sure the added lubrication of that standard was part of the test?

I mean to say, is this really an issue or has the industry self corrected?

And does anyone know if the fuel at the pump is no. 2 d s15 (15 ppm of sulfur)
or is it no. 2 d2500 (500 ppm of sulfur).
both are within the standard.

I don't even know if the no. 2 I have delivered a 'heating oil' is s15, s500 or s5000.

If you page down to the chart here http://ia700803.us.archive.org/24/it....d975.2007.pdf
it has the HFRR rating for ALL of the no. 1 thru no.2 S5000 (the old nasty version) as exactly the SAME, i.e. HFRR 520.
Let's be real clear, old fuel with a sulfur content of 5000 ppm has the same lubricity as ULSD at 520, per the standard.

The stuff the guy used in the study for his baseline was 636 - meaning it didn't meet the standard
That tells me there is no problem, maybe just hype?
__________________
Lessons learned are opportunities earned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sulfur Odor from Battery Bank djangodog Gear & Maintenance 10 08-31-2012 08:23 PM
wtb marine diesel xsboats Gear & Maintenance 1 09-06-2009 11:16 PM
FYI- Introduction of LSD (low sulfur diesel) to Marinas NewsReader Mass Bay Sailors 0 07-18-2007 10:15 PM
Auto Diesel vs Marine Diesel / Addatives NewsReader Mass Bay Sailors 0 07-11-2007 06:15 PM
Ultra low sulphur diesel and the older marine diesel Valiente Gear & Maintenance 2 10-20-2006 12:10 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.