I know there are "loop holes" provided you are friendly with the right people
and have a friendly marina manager
and don't, by pure coincidence, get on the wrong side of a local busybody
and...
I understand the reasons the laws were drafted, just as I do the reasons behind anti-terrorism laws post-9/11, anti-bikie laws, etc. However, just as with these other laws, they go too far when they can be used against you whilst NOT doing what they are designed to prevent. We don't live in a world where only the "good guys" exercise power, but one where power is exercised for maintaining vested interests, personal vendettas, and even just for the thrill of exercising power over someone else.
For example, it is possible for someone with a grudge to ensure you cannot live-aboard even if you are doing all the right things the laws were supposedly designed to prevent. There is a hard limit of three weeks every six months. You exceed that and, no matter how good a citizen on & off the water you are, someone can ensure that you cannot live on your boat. That rubs me the wrong way.
For the record, I am not one of those that think the
"water police are out to get me". I have a brother-in-law who is a member of the regular "land police" (for want of a better term) and I know that, in general, police do their job to the best of their ability and without holding grudges. They do, however, have to check on breaches of the law when informed of them - even when they know said information comes from someone who might hold a grudge or unreasonable view about the perpetrator.
Sorry, thought I should clarify my viewpoint before I get labelled as a someone with something against the "water / customs police", because it is not them I have an issue with, just overly broad legislation