Preventing or reducing anchor swinging - Page 2 - SailNet Community
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 61 Old 08-28-2007
Here .. Pull this
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,031
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
If you anchor off the stern it will tame the riding a fair bit...
Sailormann is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 61 Old 08-30-2007 Thread Starter
I'm the FNG still...
 
Lancer28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
ok how about this - could I anchor off the stern, with a storm jib up front? which side is the storm stay sails trimmed to? Backed or "ready to go" like as if I were using it to provide propulsion?

Another thing I want to try is the bridle, anchored from the bow combined with a stay sail in the back, again same question, how should I trim it? (I do have a trysail I could use)
Lancer28 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 61 Old 08-30-2007
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 17,979
Thanks: 124
Thanked 431 Times in 409 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Those riding sails help substantially in reducing the over active swinging at anchor of some boat designs. They are designed to be dead flat, no camber and no drive - basically a weathercock. - not sure a storm jib would do the job.

The don't eliminate the swing, but they do reduce it and more importantly keep the surging at each end of the swing way down. Friends who winter in the Caribbean had a real problem with swinging, and the end of rode surge did in fact occasionally trip their substantial anchor in squalls.

We had a riding sail we never used and gave it to them. They report a reduced, but more importantly, a gentler swinging action and now use it every time they are on the hook.

Possible problems I can see with anchoring astern or on the quarter is you will tend to funnel the breeze into the boat - good on hot days but may be uncomfortable at times - and increased windage from a dodger.
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 61 Old 08-30-2007
Seņor Member
 
TrueBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Narragansett Bay
Posts: 4,858
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 14
     
In addition to the aerodynamic problem faster pointed out, most boats are not designed to deploy or retrieve an anchor effectively from the stern.

Your stern lacks an anchor pulpit and roller, there's no windlass and most likely improper cleat size/backers and chocks to carry the increased loads which created the swinging problem in the first place.

True Blue . . .
sold the Nauticat
TrueBlue is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #15 of 61 Old 08-30-2007 Thread Starter
I'm the FNG still...
 
Lancer28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
ok so how about anchoring from the front with a line attached to the anchor rode on a block and I can attach to the aft of the boat and pull it in to "lean" the rode to one direction?

Will this help? See drawing.
Attached Thumbnails
drawing.JPG  
Lancer28 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #16 of 61 Old 08-30-2007 Thread Starter
I'm the FNG still...
 
Lancer28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
I just thought about this a little more, I would have to use a knot on the rode to keep the lines at angles, otherwise I think the aft line would creep back to the bow.
Lancer28 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #17 of 61 Old 08-30-2007
Seņor Member
 
TrueBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Narragansett Bay
Posts: 4,858
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 14
     
Seems like a reasonable solution lancer. But, I wouldn't get as elaborate as using a block permanently connected to your rode. Seems like just another mechanical link which could fail.

A better design would be to simply use a chain hook, clipped to the anchor chain and attached to a 3-strand nylon rope. The bitter end of the rope would then be cleated, as shown in your drawing.

True Blue . . .
sold the Nauticat
TrueBlue is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #18 of 61 Old 08-30-2007
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 17,979
Thanks: 124
Thanked 431 Times in 409 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
TB, I don't think he'll have chain to attach to at that point... it would be rope rode-to-rope.

Not sure I'd want to tie a knot along the rode for that. Better to prefab a bridle for the purpose and attach the rode to the mid point somehow.
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #19 of 61 Old 08-30-2007
Seņor Member
 
TrueBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Narragansett Bay
Posts: 4,858
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 14
     
I know his 10 feet of chain wouldn't work - he would need to increase it anyway. I first recommended that he add more chain and use a double bridle with a central chainhook.

We never swing at anchor, even while watching some boats around us acting like carnival rides. This could be due to our all-chain rode and double bridle . . . could also be we displace 9 tons. Either way, weight, bottom shape and rode triangulation all factor in preventing swing.

True Blue . . .
sold the Nauticat
TrueBlue is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #20 of 61 Old 08-30-2007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
Lancer, you're describing an anchor bridle which is commonly used to point a boat into swells instead of wind. You got the right idea. Let out more scope than usual (about 25% more). Tie your bridle line on with a rolling hitch and lead back outside to a winch. Now adjust the rode and/or line to get the point you want. Don't worry about the rolling hitch - it will stay tight and still be easy to untie. Cheers.
stevemac00 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reducing keel/adding fin? abacosol Gear & Maintenance 9 07-01-2007 09:32 PM
The Delicate Art of Preventing Seasickness Liza Copeland Seamanship Articles 0 03-25-2003 07:00 PM
The Delicate Art of Preventing Seasickness Liza Copeland Cruising Articles 0 03-25-2003 07:00 PM
The Delicate Art of Preventing Seasickness Liza Copeland Her Sailnet Articles 0 03-25-2003 07:00 PM
Reducing Propwalk Mark Matthews Seamanship Articles 0 03-28-2002 07:00 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome