How do you feel about catamarans? - Page 17 - SailNet Community
 123Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #161 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
Senior Member
 
capt vimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 626
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 2
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
...Just as your statement above that you wouldn't cross from the Maldives to Australia in a multi. Basically calling multis only coastal cruisers...
that is my choice and my decision - what about it?
why so defensive?
Quote:
I have stated that I think they are both seaworthy vessels and it's just a matter of choice. I don't believe I've attacked monos and if I have it wasn't much. Kinda burns my ass that I've owned and sailed multis for over 23 years and have always had to put up with a bunch of uneducated mono hullers putting down my choice to sail what I like. So be it as I am happy that I had the chance to seriously research the advantages and disadvantages of multis and I made the choice I did. Live and let live
i never attacked multis either...
as i said - they have their merits.

and to call me uneducated... thank you!
and i never put down your choice, it is just not mine...
are we allowed here to talk about "how we feel about catamarans"?
wait - isn't that the threads title?

and i was not spouting such nonsense as that a mono drops its keel if rolled or sinks within 30 sec after going turtle etc bb...
and now you are telling me that we monohullers are discrediting not your choice, but YOUR BOAT?
ridiculous...
capt vimes is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #162 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
Senior Member
 
capt vimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 626
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 2
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Wait a minute, didn't you just say leave it, because there are obviously differences we cannot agree on now?
i meant the insurance discussion...
capt vimes is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #163 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
smj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by capt vimes View Post
i meant the insurance discussion...
I know then you brought it up again
smj is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #164 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
smj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by capt vimes View Post
that is my choice and my decision - what about it?
why so defensive?

i never attacked multis either...
as i said - they have their merits.

and to call me uneducated... thank you!
and i never put down your choice, it is just not mine...
are we allowed here to talk about "how we feel about catamarans"?
wait - isn't that the threads title?

and i was not spouting such nonsense as that a mono drops its keel if rolled or sinks within 30 sec after going turtle etc bb...
and now you are telling me that we monohullers are discrediting not your choice, but YOUR BOAT?
ridiculous...
Ah......but if you were to educate yourself you would realize that, yes you can sail a multi from Maldives to Australia safely, though you may not want to
smj is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #165 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
Senior Member
 
capt vimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 626
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 2
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Ah......but if you were to educate yourself you would realize that, yes you can sail a multi from Maldives to Australia safely, though you may not want to
now that sounds good...
have you read your post?
capt vimes is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #166 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
smj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by capt vimes View Post
now that sounds good...
have you read your post?
Busted! Maybe I need to be edumacated
capt vimes likes this.
smj is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #167 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hobart
Posts: 106
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
Since monohulls have the same chance of sinking as cats do flipping which would you rather be on? Plenty of people have been rescued of inverted cats, it makes for a great news story. The still floating cat also gives rescuers a visual to start their search, not the same with a sunk mono. Crews of inverted cats have been known to retrieve stores of their boats, not the same with sunk monos. Crews on cats have tied their liferafts of to the inverted boat with a long line, try that on a sinking mono!
If there was such a big risk of a cat flipping and lives being lost why do insurance companies consider cats to be an equal or better risk than a mono. Surely of all people they would know the risks?
If you build a cat and a mono without floatation of the same material then cats have a higher chance of sinking by any assessment, as they have two hulls. A breach in either hull will sink a cat if it's not compartmentalized or lacks positive floatation. There are many cats that have neither and they can, and have sunk commonly enough.

There are some silly comparisons of holed sunken monoís with inverted unholed multihulls that do the rounds. The types of arguments you posted above abound. They ignore all the other scenarios that occur in any SOLAS assessment and neither are they based on any sensible statistics based on well found crusing boats of both varieties.

Any Comparison should consider a matrix of possibilities with the variables being damaged , undamaged , knocked down or rolled and recovered, and knocked down permanently inverted and then holed and floating and holed and sunk.

Cats sink in collisions unless they are subdivided watertight, or have positive floatation. The same goes for a monohull. Itís disingenuous to use arguments that require one craft to be damaged to get a favorable comparison with another craft thatís undamaged albeit inverted (and also a wreck) .

Not only is an inverted cat a wreck itís an inaccessible wreck without risking your life further. Recently south of Kangaroo island South Australia in moderate sea conditions it took fit men 4 hours of repeated diving attempts just to get the EPIRB from the immersed bridge deck. That cat flipped after hitting a semi submerged object which it apparently 'tripped over'.

Inverted cruising cats in rough weather invariably kill most of their occupants because there is nothing proactive possible except finding and activating the EPIRB. Only people inverted in more benign conditions can sit on the upturned hull or dive for supplies or even make the hull in the first instance. Survivors of the wreck are often separated as they swim out shocked and disoriented into heavy seas. Even if they make the upturned hull the chance of remaining on it is slim and even tethers have been snapped and people lost. Others managed to wedge themselves into the escape hatch and watch others washed away one by one as they get exhausted.

Note that trimarans are better inverted survival platforms than Cats and events like the 'Rose Noel' are often taken as an indication that all inverted multihulls share the same characteristics. Cats immerse lower in the water and the entire bridge deck is not only usually awash but the inverted cat usually floats stern down.

As for people ignorant about the high rate of fatalities from cat inversion in heavy weather, I find it hard to believe that the detailed coroners reports and first hand accounts from these events are unknown. Escape hatches have not made much difference either. Anybody should be able to find several first hand accounts and coroners reports if they search.

Importantly the deaths were largely preventable had the skippers chosen to stop and lie to a drogue/sea anchor. I think it's important that cat operators should understand this and not try and rationalize away the risk of carrying on in heavy weather. The same is not true of self righting hulls of any description which intrinsically have a much lower level of risk.
capt vimes likes this.
MikeJohns is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #168 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
smj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJohns View Post
If you build a cat and a mono without floatation of the same material then cats have a higher chance of sinking by any assessment, as they have two hulls. A breach in either hull will sink a cat if it's not compartmentalized or lacks positive floatation. There are many cats that have neither and they can, and have sunk commonly enough.

There are some silly comparisons of holed sunken monoís with inverted unholed multihulls that do the rounds. The types of arguments you posted above abound. They ignore all the other scenarios that occur in any SOLAS assessment and neither are they based on any sensible statistics based on well found crusing boats of both varieties.

Any Comparison should consider a matrix of possibilities with the variables being damaged , undamaged , knocked down or rolled and recovered, and knocked down permanently inverted and then holed and floating and holed and sunk.

Cats sink in collisions unless they are subdivided watertight, or have positive floatation. The same goes for a monohull. Itís disingenuous to use arguments that require one craft to be damaged to get a favorable comparison with another craft thatís undamaged albeit inverted (and also a wreck) .

Not only is an inverted cat a wreck itís an inaccessible wreck without risking your life further. Recently south of Kangaroo island South Australia in moderate sea conditions it took fit men 4 hours of repeated diving attempts just to get the EPIRB from the immersed bridge deck. That cat flipped after hitting a semi submerged object which it apparently 'tripped over'.

Inverted cruising cats in rough weather invariably kill most of their occupants because there is nothing proactive possible except finding and activating the EPIRB. Only people inverted in more benign conditions can sit on the upturned hull or dive for supplies or even make the hull in the first instance. Survivors of the wreck are often separated as they swim out shocked and disoriented into heavy seas. Even if they make the upturned hull the chance of remaining on it is slim and even tethers have been snapped and people lost. Others managed to wedge themselves into the escape hatch and watch others washed away one by one as they get exhausted.

Note that trimarans are better inverted survival platforms than Cats and events like the 'Rose Noel' are often taken as an indication that all inverted multihulls share the same characteristics. Cats immerse lower in the water and the entire bridge deck is not only usually awash but the inverted cat usually floats stern down.

As for people ignorant about the high rate of fatalities from cat inversion in heavy weather, I find it hard to believe that the detailed coroners reports and first hand accounts from these events are unknown. Escape hatches have not made much difference either. Anybody should be able to find several first hand accounts and coroners reports if they search.

Importantly the deaths were largely preventable had the skippers chosen to stop and lie to a drogue/sea anchor. I think it's important that cat operators should understand this and not try and rationalize away the risk of carrying on in heavy weather. The same is not true of self righting hulls of any description which intrinsically have a much lower level of risk.
But the fact still remains that multihulls statistically flip as often as monos sink. So which would you rather be on?
smj is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #169 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
Remember you're a womble
 
PaulinVictoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 2,124
Thanks: 11
Thanked 54 Times in 52 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

Quote:
why do i always have the impression that the multihullers try to convince anybody to choose a multi at any time?
i just don't get it...
It's the same as the various iSyndromes. The iPadiban being my particular favourite (thanks BL).

Orange Crush
1974 C&C27 MkII

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PaulinVictoria is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #170 of 308 Old 03-14-2014
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 143
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 2
 
Re: How do you feel about catamarans?

True enough,,,,but

90% of those mono's sink at dock from rotted hoses while close to 100% of the multi flip while sailing.

Hard to drown tied to the dock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by smj View Post
But the fact still remains that multihulls statistically flip as often as monos sink. So which would you rather be on?
MikeJohns likes this.
Shockwave is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most of you know how I feel about waving, right? flyingwelshman General Discussion (sailing related) 32 08-19-2013 10:46 PM
Help I feel out of my depth rwilson37643 Boat Review and Purchase Forum 44 02-12-2012 12:21 PM
Does anyone ever feel this way? Barquito General Discussion (sailing related) 43 10-10-2010 12:32 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome