SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: sails well in light air AND heavy weather? Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
10-14-2003 05:26 AM
sails well in light air AND heavy weather?

There is a lot that I agree with in Paul''s post regarding the selection of a boat with good performance at both ends of the wind range and I do think that Paul comments open up a lot more choices, and more signoficantly a lot more reasonably priced choices.

I wanted to touch on the issues that Paul raised regarding L/D and SA/D. Most of the sailing texts that deal with the topic of ideal L/D and SA/D based those numbers on earlier designs. If we compare a very typical old style performance 41 footer we might have seen numbers like a WL length of 31.5 feet, 17000 lbs of displacement, 700 s.f of working sail area. That would have produced a boat with an L/D around 240 and a SA/D around 17. In sailing mode these boats used very large genoas to get help them perform in lighter going which would often take these boats up into the L/D in the mid-20 range.

If we look at boats derived from the IMS type form (or boats like the J''s mentioned above which are closer to stretched 1980''s era MORC type forms)the numbers would shift some. For a newer 41 footer we might have seen numbers like a WL length of 36 feet, 16000 lbs of displacement, 850 s.f of working sail area. That would have produced a boat with an L/D around 150 and a SA/D around 21.5. The more more modern design would typically have more ballast carried lower and so would have an easier time standing to its sailplan. The lower D/L comes predominantly in the lengthening of the waterline and not from excessive lightening of the boat. In most studies of factors involved in safety at sea, all other things being equal, nothing succeeds like waterline length in determining how well a boat handles heavy weather. (The second most critical factor seems to be vertical center of gravity [VCG} as compared to VCB [vertical center of buoyancy.)Longer waterline lengths generally mean less pitching and more comfortable pitching motion. They also mean a lot more speed. (While older style boats do pick up some speed while heeled, it comes at the price of sailing at a greater heel angle and greater drag. Current studies suggest that the incremental gain in speed due to heeling in these older designs loses something to increased heel induced drag and so is nowhere near as large as would be expected with a boat whose vertical waterline equals the heeled waterline of an older boat.

The big advantage to a rig whose standing SA/D of 22 is the ability to use of smaller non-overlapping or minimally overlapping jibs even in light air. That actually means smaller easier to tack headsails which is a great advantage to short handed family type crews. Modern rigs permit the quick depowering without needing to reef as soon and that ability to shift gears on the fly also works well on a short-handed boat and allows a much greater control with a larger standing sail plan. On both the older style (large genoa/small mainsail) and on newer style rigs, somewhere before 20 knots something needs to happen. In the case of the older style rig, it often means a change to a smaller headsail (or living with a poorly shaped partially roller furled genoa) and perhaps a reef. In the case of the more modern rig, this generally means a reef in the mainsail. Properly rigged this is very easy for a single person to do on the fly with a two line reef system lead back to the cockpit. This is especially ideal since most boats develop more weather helm as the windspeeds increase and so reefing the mainsail helps move the CE forward and reduces weather helm. Most Fractionally rigged boats that I have sailed with L/D''s in the 22 range can sail quite well with the small jib into wind ranges up approaching 30 or so knots. This ability to maintain balance without a sail changes really helps with both shorthanding especially at the heavy air end of things and is something given up with a standing sail plan with an L/D down around 17.


10-13-2003 04:47 PM
sails well in light air AND heavy weather?

I t actually seems that sailing well in heavier conditions is the more difficult part of the compromise. I agree with most of Jeff''s criteria, but not necessarily the D/L and SA/D target he''s suggesting.

There may be other ways to broaden the performance to get a more inclusive list of boats.

The low VCG and narrow hull (easily driven) give performance that is both
--stiff and able to carry sail better in snotty conditions;
--and able to slide through the water with minimal horsepower from the sails (and corespondingly better chance in bad conditins of not flogging the crew) .
The easily driven hull will also get you to moderate/low form stability (cause it''s just not that fat).

We found that minimizing the prop drag by installing a feathering prop was far more important than shopping for the lowest wetted surface in keel & rudder.

Getting a hull that is narrow enough, yet still broad enough aft for good reaching is tough. The J-boat cruising line 32, 40 42 are good examples, as is the Nordic 44 and some of the Peterson models. It was too small for our family, but the Olson 34 and Santa Cruz 27 could be other examples of the concept.

We didn''t want a cored hull but did want a cored deck, so our tradeoffs led us to a Newport 41 mk II (it''s a C&C design).

Most of the very pinched IOR sterns are more narrow than the goal Meanwhile the "let''s look good at the dock" boats are too fat. (aka "lets ventilate the rudder and lose all control while underway")

The place I have trouble with part of the other recommendation is the SA/D and D/L. Above 22 you have to be right on top of any reefing requirements, and that''s a handfull if you are using family as crew. 17 seemed right for us.

On the D/L aspect, ours comes in at 240 static and call it 190 when heeled underway. That tradeoff to get the solid hull was ok for us.
10-09-2003 02:53 PM
sails well in light air AND heavy weather?

The answer is complicated but in the short form in order to get good performance in both light air and heavy, you want a boat with a low VCG, an easily driven hull, moderate to low form stability, low wetted surface, comparatively fine entry and enough bearing aft to get good performance power reaching, a D/L below 160 and a SA/D above 22, an easy to depower sail plan and a deck layout that minimizes the chances of down flooding.

10-09-2003 10:57 AM
sails well in light air AND heavy weather?

Can it be done? What criteria are necessary?

Low Disp to LWL ratio I presume is one factor.

I guess a spinaker is like Nitrous. If you have enough, anything will go faster, but it''s not always an elegent solution, and sometimes it just doesnt work (light winds and going to windward?)



-- James

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome