SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Flying an undeclared oversized jib as a spinnaker Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
06-17-2004 04:49 AM
Flying an undeclared oversized jib as a spinnaker


Actually, that is a valid way to fly a headsail when going downwind. Its much more efficient than poling out the clew as when going wing & wing because the luff of the sail remains the leading edge and is out of the turbulent air from the main. When the clew is poled out (wing & wing), the leech is the leading edge and this is just plain backwards.
Poling out the tack is an efficient and stable manner in which to go downwind in heavy air if the spinnaker is too much but main alone is not enough or too rolly. It would be faster than no spinnaker at all and maybe easier to manage than a small spinnaker.
The ''modern'' spinnaker actually evolved from this practice.
Try it sometime, you''ll be amazed.

As to the legality of it in a race....I guess it would depend on whether the committee based their definition of sail type on dimensions or implementation. I would tend to think it would still be classed as a 170 Genoa and penalized as such because there''s nothing to prevent it from being used as one, despite claimed intentions to the contrary.

06-16-2004 02:43 AM
Flying an undeclared oversized jib as a spinnaker

This was a question posed by one of our club members who had read about it in a book. He states it used to be a practice sometimes used when the winds were too high for the normal spinnaker.

I think that today anyone wanting to run a spinnaker in a high wind would have a sail built for that purpose so this 170 business would not be done. I was just looking for some answers to a rather interesting question.

Our local PHRF association handicapper has stated that it would be viewed as a headsail since at the midpoint its girth is less than half of that normally assigned to a spinnker so that by definition it is a jib. He further went on to say that if on board in our association it would be considered inventory and the boat would be penalized 6 secs per mile for an oversized jib.

06-15-2004 06:09 PM
Flying an undeclared oversized jib as a spinnaker

Here''s the rule for spinnaker size, you can figure out whether a 170% would fit the measurements:
"a spinnaker width equal to 1.8 times J, a spinnaker height equal to .95 times the square root of I squared plus J squared"

If somehow this fits within the rules, it leaves open the question of why in hell would you do this as the perfomance would probably be horrendous, if the sail even fills...??
06-15-2004 12:44 PM
Flying an undeclared oversized jib as a spinnaker

There are different definitions for headsails and spinnakers. Generally, the mid-girth (the distance between the half-leach to the half-luff) needs to be less than half the foot or LP dimension, ensuring straight or concave leading and trailing edges. A spinnaker needs to have its mid girth at least 75% of the foot dimension, ensuring that at least one of the vertical edges will be very convex, or roached. The sail''s attachment (or not) to the stay is usually not relevant.
06-15-2004 07:06 AM
Flying an undeclared oversized jib as a spinnaker

I have been asked if a boat that has declared a 150 as largest genoa with a standard spinnaker can use an undeclared sail (170 genoa) not as a genoa but flown as a spinnaker.

the words were "flying my 170 but like a spinnaker, with the Tack poled out to windward on the spinnaker pole and of course not hanked on".

Does a boat that does this with a sail that has the hanks on the sail but not attached have to declare this as an oversized headsail? Even if not ever intending to use as a genoa in a race?
Is this legal to fly as a spinnaker given the construction of the luff ona typical 170 genoa?

Are there other considerations?



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome