SailNet Community - Reply to Topic

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Boat Review and Purchase Forum > boat check - to Jeff H and others
 Not a Member? 


Thread: boat check - to Jeff H and others Reply to Thread
Title:
  

By choosing to post the reply below you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below


Topic Review (Newest First)
12-05-2006 02:55 AM
sailaway21 No worries mate.
12-04-2006 09:29 PM
BADG A good thread none the less.
I don't like spam but am glad I got to read this thread.
12-04-2006 07:21 PM
sailingdog SailinJay-

Hubert is a spammer...so it has nothing to do with the thread.
12-04-2006 05:49 PM
SailinJay Despite the fact that the thread is over three years old, what does this post have to do with the original thread?
12-04-2006 02:06 PM
hubertwiesmann
money related articles!

Hi,
what you think about http://hyip-list.com ?
It was a hyip LIST befor some months. And now..... only info site.
08-28-2003 05:52 PM
Jeff_H
boat check - to Jeff H and others

You might try the Laser 28 website. There are usually a half dozen or more for sale at any time. I owned one for 13 or so years and really loved the boat.

Jeff
08-28-2003 11:45 AM
msl
boat check - to Jeff H and others

Thank you Jeff. I understand the "kissing my sister" idea... and I was unaware of the existence of a Laser 28. They certainly look more like what we are shopping for. The "admiral" would be more comfortable with its layout than a J-30''s. The Pearson 30 was considered already.

Do you know of any Laser 28''s "out there"?

Thanks again,
Mark L.
08-28-2003 09:12 AM
Jeff_H
boat check - to Jeff H and others

The J-30 is a tough boat to classify. In its day the J-30 was revolutionary. From the viewpoint of the late 1970''s, they provided excellent performance, on the par with racing 40 footers of the day. They could be raced one design or cruised by a couple. The fractional rig and bendy rig made them a good single-hander as viewed from a 1970''s context. They were reasonably well constructed and low maintenance boats.

But they are a 25 year old design and a lot has happened in those 25 years. For one thing J-30''s were incredibly beamy and lightly balasted. As a result they counted on a lot of crew on the rail in a breeze. They are actually comparatively heavy which means that they are a little less forgiving than they might have been. I have always found them sommewhat of a blunt instrument compared to boats like the J-27 and J-22 that followed them. Thier cockpits are quite cramped and as originally delivered their hardware was not the most user friendly. Compared to slightly later boats, (Laser 28s for example) sailing them was sort of the sailing equivalent of kissing your sister. There are construction issues with these boats that are reasonably well understood.

Still and all, they are basically good boats. They can make a good family cruiser or single-hander. They offer reasonably good performance and accomodations as compared to slightly earlier designs like a Pearson 30 and are certainly easier boats to short-hand.

Respectfully,
Jeff
08-28-2003 05:28 AM
msl
boat check - to Jeff H and others

Where would the J-30 fit into this point of view ... as a decent single handed cruiser?
I looked at one this week. Lots to like, I thought.
Mark L.
08-28-2003 04:38 AM
Silmaril
boat check - to Jeff H and others

I have been following this thread with great interest. I had spent many years searching for the "perfect" boat...FOR ME. What I may find ideal, others may find, well, odd. I follow what Jeff H is saying, and my final choice would be somewhat in line with what he has been saying here. I have a 37'' boat that displaces roughly 11,000# with about 5,500# in her keel. This boat is very easily driven, and works well in almost all conditions.

When it comes to loading up 2,000# worth of gear, two things will affect that the most. First, hull form. A boat with greater wetted surface, (you know, the part below the waterline) will be able to better support the additional weight. My light weight boat may be able to better support the addtional weight than the heavier boat due to my wider beam and greater surface I have to support the addtional weight. So the increase in weight may have less of an impact on the hull being "pressed into" the water. You would see less of a change in my waterline, so to speak.

The second is where the additional weight is placed. I may be a little off the mark, but if all that weight is stowed high up and away from the CG of the vessel, it will make the boat less stable. Keeping the weight close to the boats CG will have less of an effect on the boats stability.

I have sailed "traditional" designs in rough weather, and while they have slower motions through the water, I have usually found them to be wet rides. Plowing through waves and heavy chop as opposed to riding over them. Many more "Greenies" rolling aft than on a lighter design.

But there is no perfect design, for if there were, we would all be sailing the same thing!

I like lighter weight, easily driven designs. You can still have a robust vessel that just doesn''t weigh alot. The other day, I was out in 25-30kts with a 3-5''chop. Just my main, and I was cruising quite comfortably at 7kts. I watched as heavier, "Cruising" designs were struggling to keep up with reefed mains and luffing jibs. My passengers and I were having a wonderful time, t-shirts and bathing suits, enjoying the blustery day, while the "Cruisers" were hunkered down in full foulies, getting soaked. Hey, to each there own!
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.