SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2? Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-17-2013 11:44 AM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

Originally Posted by kulokoo View Post
A couple plastic classics...

Which would you rather race, take to sea in a swell, surf downwind, sail the Pacific in?

Ericson 35-2 (1969)
LWL: 26'
Beam: 10'
Displacement: 11,600
Draft: 4'11"
Ballast (B/D): 5,000 (43%)
Sail Area (SA/D): 534 (17)

Cal 36 (1966)
LWL: 27'
Beam: 10'3"
Displacement: 11,200
Draft: 5'8"
Ballast (B/D): 4,500 (40%)
Sail Area (SA/D): 600 (19)
Like I mentioned both are fine boats and very similar. Despite a small amount of sail area extra the phrf ratings by the USA sanctioning body ratings are exactly the same at 153.
03-17-2013 11:26 AM
Lake Superior Sailor
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

Cal has less weight & more sail! Longer keel & water line will help not hurt,,lets line them up!...Dale
03-17-2013 02:02 AM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

Where is the Ericson faster - upwind or downwind?

The Ericson looks like it might be quicker upwind, or point closer, but I was wondering if the Cal 36 has an advantage surfing downwind swell. I know it's not a Cal 40, but it kind of looks like one.
03-16-2013 04:04 PM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

my ericson 35 mII has left cals and catalinas in the dust behind the a well designed fast boat ....comfortable and very fast.
03-16-2013 12:00 PM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

Very similar boats as was said. Take the one in the best overall condition. I think the Erickson build quality to be a lttle better.

If all was the same condition...I would do the Erickson
03-16-2013 11:21 AM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

The one in better shape. Plain and simple, it is condition, condition, condition. Both quality production boats, but older, so it really depends on what one is in better shape. I don't think initial quality really plays much of a roll in a 40 year old boat, if it has made it this far, I think it should be good to go. They are both cruiser/racers. The Cal looks to be more cruiser oriented based purely on the hull shape (longer fin). If the boat is in good shape I don't think you could go wrong going either direction. Not sure when the Cal was last produced but the Ericson was made till 1981 so it had a pretty long production run, that says a lot for the design.
03-16-2013 10:46 AM
Lake Superior Sailor
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

I think the Cal is faster!..Dale
03-16-2013 08:38 AM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

if you want to sail really fast, use ericson.
03-16-2013 08:15 AM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

They have nearly identical PHRF ratings - avg. 153. I like both. Probably just a matter of your taste in boats.
03-16-2013 07:59 AM
Re: Cal 36 or Ericson 35-2?

Ericson! I just think it has better initial build quality . . .
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome