SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-30-2002 09:48 AM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

Yeah and just last week Mr Limpet help me avoid a rock.
My tri-ducer is located forward of the keel and my unit has an offset for the depth. I still find the botom type usefull at anchor time.
01-29-2002 01:53 PM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

To JWMOORE, what sort of fishfinder are you describing? Also, does it have a keel offset?
01-28-2002 07:37 PM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

My depth sounder is broken also. They always seem to be. But my fishfinder works great. The sensor is epoxied to the inside of the hull, not on the transom, and works great. Sound waves can''t tell the difference between a half inch of water and a half inch of fiberglass. The previous owner installed it just behind the keel, but it could have been mounted in front.... there was plenty of cable.
01-28-2002 02:24 PM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

Ahoy Denr, Avast there ye bildge rat , the Capt''n is calling ye on deck for ye promotion the rank of second mate. Ye fired a right fine salvo and hit the mark true!! Be warned the rest of the crew mighten hold ye a grudge but pay em no mind. Let that new pistol in yer belt do yer talking if the knaves get out of line. Mind ye check yer flint often and keep yer powder dry lest ye take a pin to yer head for the misfire. Aye tis a glass of rum ye deserve and I be swilling you a toast meself. Big Red 56 the Pirate of Pine Island.
01-28-2002 11:01 AM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

Do you use your fish finder to locate talking fish to ask them what the depth is at the front of your boat? Depth sounders are normally located in the forward third of the hull, that is to say, before the keel tells you that the water is too skinny. If your stuck on the bottom it really doesn''t matter what type of bottom you''re stuck in! Having a fish finder mounted on the stern of the boat seems dumb unless you sail backwards most of the time.
01-28-2002 08:50 AM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

I like my fish finder. One instrument for less than the price of 2 sailing instruments (depth and Speed)! Another advantage you can see the bottom type.
01-28-2002 05:54 AM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

Check out the transducers that come with each unit. Many Fishfinders use transom mount version versus the thru hull transducers used most often in sailboats. A transom mount transducer is not a viable option on a sailboat for many reason one of which is that it comes out of the water when heeling.

My boat came with a fishfinder that had an optional thru hull transducer available. When I enquired on the price of obtaining the thru hull transducer I noticed that for very few dollars more I could buy a whole new depthsounder (not fishfinder).



01-27-2002 08:11 AM
Cost of depth sounders vs fishfinders

I know there has been a lot written on depth sounders vs fishfinders for use on sailboats, but I
wonder if anyone has any idea why Hummingbird can produce a fishfinder that has a depth
sounder built in as part of it and that can show the configuration of the bottom (as well as any fish
present) for under $100 (their cheapest model) but if you look for depth sounders, most of which
only show a number the cost is $250 and up. I understand that construction may be cheaper, and
that the fishfinder in question does not have a keel offset as most depth sounders do, but that''s
still a big difference in price. Does anyone have enough experience with both to comment? I''d
appreciate it because I''m in the market for a depth sounder of some sort for my CD26. Thanks,

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome