SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Need maritime legal advice... Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
02-05-2007 03:21 PM
hellosailor Oscar-
"as I need him to sign my sea service form" Well, that sure complicates things. I mistook your post for a simple contractor's complaint, i.e. mechanics lien. Confess now, did you eat all the strawberries & ice cream?

Which "we" is where? I'm not suggesting the US system can be fixed in ten minutes on the back of an envelope, but even the judicial associations agree that it is so ripe with abuse that something long needs to be done. On the small scale, even the NYTimes recently had an article about NYS trying to change the basic levels, because so many local judges are simply local clowns who literally ignore the law. Among other problems. But then again, the NYTimes *and* the entire NYC/NYS judicial system also long ignored the point that judgeships could (and doubtlessly still can) be bought, even in NYC, by party members with the price of a new car.
Great way to run the courts. (Not.)
02-05-2007 03:14 PM
oscarzulu Thanks for the replies, I've thought about all these responses... unfortunately the loss of the boat would be the end of my lien as I understand. Plus there's that whole karma thing too.
I have been in contact with the secretary who had said that she and the owner want to settle this up, but that was about a month ago.
I believe my biggest ally here would be his daughter who seems quite genuine.

I've been hesitant to escalate the calls as I need him to sign my sea service form so that I can get my captain's license. After 4 years of skippering his boat not getting his signature would mean my needing to 90 more days out on the water... Which would probably mean an additional 3-4 months before I could get licensed. (See Need maritime legal advice pt. II)

I'm just hoping the guy is dragging his feet and thinking of the interest he's incurring on the money he owes me, I know that that has been his business tactic throughout his life.
Again thanks for the responses, I'd appreciate help on the next topic as that'll dictate my actions concerning this post.
02-05-2007 03:10 PM
pigslo Hellosailor. I beleive you just realed off a half a dozen fixes that unimplementable what I would consider as having a result worse than what you are trying to fix. We left U.K. and created a slightly different legal system beause of what we considered wrong with theirs.
02-05-2007 01:14 PM
hellosailor SD-
"If the legal system required the losing party to pay all the court costs for both sides, I'm told that's the norm in Britain and the complaint there is that the risk of losing prevents poorer people with valid claims from risking court.

In many US courts the judge is not required to be a lawyer or legal scholar even in the loosest definition of the term. Sad thing, because they usually could find grounds for a vengeful whooping if they only bothered.

I think we also need to "motivate" the shyster lawyers, by telling them that if their client loses, they'll have to pay half the claim or forfeit their law licenses unless they've been "batting at least .800". Everyone is going to lose from time to time, but the ones who really KNOW up front they haven't got a leg to stand on--need to be motivated away.
02-05-2007 12:57 PM
Originally Posted by hellosailor
I agree with you. And, also know there are many scoundrels who will claim they have been slandered simply because they know a high dollar counterclaim against you has to go to court anyway, and will scare away many people. Cheap bullies and terrorists, nothing more, but still to beware of.
Unfortunately true... I think that the legal system in this country could do with some serious reform. If the legal system required the losing party to pay all the court costs for both sides, far fewer frivilous lawsuits would occur. If the legal system could award punitive damages and fine the attorneys on the losing side directly, rather than just their clients, in cases deemed frivilous or without merit, then you would see them all but disappear.
02-05-2007 12:51 PM
hellosailor SD-
I agree with you. And, also know there are many scoundrels who will claim they have been slandered simply because they know a high dollar counterclaim against you has to go to court anyway, and will scare away many people. Cheap bullies and terrorists, nothing more, but still to beware of.
02-05-2007 12:18 PM
sailingdog Hellosailor-

If the gentleman in question does actually owe the funds...saying that he does is not slander, but the truth...and truth is generally a pretty good defense against a charge of slander. Stating that you are trying to collect a debt that he owes is not slander... if he actually owes it..
02-05-2007 11:56 AM
hellosailor Sailormann-
"Have you tried calling his office and " Careful there, witnesses can mean countercharges like slander and a sticky mess.

As we gentlemen say in the sport of yacht racing, "Leave no survivors and you'll spend less time in the protest room." (Who me, say that?!)

Besides, it would be more fun to burn his house down and then stop by to ask if his boat was his only remaining asset. (While lighting up your cheap cigar with a big Zippo, and flicking embers around.) Hey, accidents happen.

(Remember, arson is considered outrageous and just shouldn't be done by unlicensed personnel.)
02-05-2007 12:54 AM
Sailormann You could try some of the tactics that collection agencies use, and because you are not a collector yourself, and hence not bound by laws governing their codes of conduct - you can certainly go a little farther than they can. I would start by embarassing him. Have you tried calling his office and explaining to his secretary and his collegues that you are trying to collect a debt that he refuses to pay ??? You can take this a step further, by obtaining the names of his colleagues and sending them ver polite little notes aasking them if they would be so kind as to remind him that he owes you money. Ditto his boat club in the Caymans... Have you tried running a credit report on him and then contacting the company that holds his ortgage to find out if he is paying them, because he doesn't seem too inclined to pay you ???
02-04-2007 03:08 PM
Tartan34C It doesnít matter where the boat is registered but if you have a valid lien naming the boat you can arrest the boat in the United States. If you want to chase the boat outside of the United States and the work was done in RI you need to start an action in the country where the boat is. A lien is not portable.

On the other hand if you get a judgment naming the owner and he has propriety in another state or country you can prefect that lien and seize assets that are in his name and it doesnít matter where the assets are. The court will order the seizure and sale of the assets.

I think you will need an attorney unless you have a lot of patience and donít mind doing a lot of research to get the paperwork right. Itís not straight forward and he can bond out of it if you arrest the boat. One action is in Federal court and the other might be in State court with a significant different in cost depending on how you do it.
Good luck and all the best,
Robert Gainer

I am not an attorney and donít play one on TV. I owned a marine business for 35 years and have been involved in salvage, commercial repair work and litigation involving both. You need an attorney and depending on how you want to proceed you may need a Admiralty Attorney or simply a civil attorney.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome